Liverpool FC Forum

[stmichael]

turns out ayre is not currently trying to tie up the coutinho deal. sky are infact filming another series of "an idiot abroad"

[C-R]

turns out ayre is not currently trying to tie up the coutinho deal. sky are infact filming another series of "an idiot abroad"

lol Excellent

[Thommo's perm]

morons on twitter now kicking off with an old picture of rodgers wearing a s*n t-shirt for a charity event he was involved with in 2011, before he had any association with our club whatsoever.

some people will use anything to bash the man with.

Has he explained or apologised for wearing it?

[Kenny Kan]

turns out ayre is not currently trying to tie up the coutinho deal. sky are infact filming another series of "an idiot abroad"

[SouthCoastShankly]

morons on twitter now kicking off with an old picture of rodgers wearing a s*n t-shirt for a charity event he was involved with in 2011, before he had any association with our club whatsoever.

some people will use anything to bash the man with.

Has he explained or apologised for wearing it?

Does he need to?

Are you offended?

[laza]

Maybe he should also be sorry for ballboy being a Hazard trap and im guessing he can take credit for Swansea getting to final as it was his teams and not Laudrups   

[Kenny Kan]

Hazerd didn't even kick the little squirt, he shouldn't have been interfering with play and lying belly down on the ball anyway.

[Basil]

The ballboy shouldn't have been trying to hold on to the ball but I think you'll find that Hazzard did kick kick him and it wasn't even Chelsea's ball at the time, perhaps Hazzard and his team mates should have put more effort in when the ball was in play.

[Thommo's perm]

morons on twitter now kicking off with an old picture of rodgers wearing a s*n t-shirt for a charity event he was involved with in 2011, before he had any association with our club whatsoever.

some people will use anything to bash the man with.

Has he explained or apologised for wearing it?

Does he need to?

Are you offended?

I am not offended, but I do think it warrants an explanation out of courtesy

[red till i die!!]

if this happened before he became our manager then its none of our business what he did for that rag. i would think he is educated enough now to disassociate himself totally from them when he took this job.
it would be career suicide for him if he was to parade himself in that thing now and he couldnt be that stupid.

[devaney]

The ballboy shouldn't have been trying to hold on to the ball but I think you'll find that Hazzard did kick kick him and it wasn't even Chelsea's ball at the time, perhaps Hazzard and his team mates should have put more effort in when the ball was in play.

It was actually quite funny and guess what after the match Hazard and and the ball boy got together and apologised to each other and shook hands. Common sense prevailed. If he had been a ball boy for Man United I wonder what would have happened Ferguson no doubt would be charging in to the referees changing room screaming that the ball boy had been kicked ten times and should be banned for life !!!

[kazza]

What would the press have said if it was Suarez that kicked that ballboy 

[kazza]

On the kick however the player let his fustration get the better of him. He did kick the boy and not the ball from under him as claimed. The ballboy was a little snotty sh1t but players should never get involved like that. He should serve a long ban I think as it was way out of line. The boy did deserve a kick though but players should show more self control and when they don't they should be punished whether he appologised or not.

[Kenny Kan]

On the kick however the player let his fustration get the better of him. He did kick the boy and not the ball from under him as claimed. The ballboy was a little snotty sh1t but players should never get involved like that. He should serve a long ban I think as it was way out of line. The boy did deserve a kick though but players should show more self control and when they don't they should be punished whether he appologised or not.

Hazard wasn't out of line, the kid was.

Had the kid done his job instead of whaling on the ball like a time wasting id.iot, Hazard wouldn't have needed to try and get the ball back.

[Boocity]

On the kick however the player let his fustration get the better of him. He did kick the boy and not the ball from under him as claimed. The ballboy was a little snotty sh1t but players should never get involved like that. He should serve a long ban I think as it was way out of line. The boy did deserve a kick though but players should show more self control and when they don't they should be punished whether he appologised or not.

Hazard wasn't out of line, the kid was.

Had the kid done his job instead of whaling on the ball like a time wasting id.iot, Hazard wouldn't have needed to try and get the ball back.

have to agree with you, the ball boy should be banned, the FA should instruct all clubs that behaviour like this from ball boys, stewards etc is not acceptable. If Hazzard get a lengthy ban and no sanction for Swansea or the ball boy then you will get more of the little feckers doing things like that