Liverpool FC Forum

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:17 pm

Still waiting to find out from Kewell what sort of expectations he will have on a new manager next summer .

Will he be demanding the sack if he doesn't get 4th spot as well ?

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:21 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there? :laugh:

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

:laugh:

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:23 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

They aren't in the top 4 .

If they end up in the top four instead of us Chelsea and Arsenal then I will come back on here and state how right you were .

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:23 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:Still waiting to find out from Kewell what sort of expectations he will have on a new manager next summer .

Will he be demanding the sack if he doesn't get 4th spot as well ?

"hello, is that Newcastle football club?

Yes, i'm calling to say that you've not spent 500 million and therefore are not allowed to get into the top 4"

:laugh:

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:24 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:Still waiting to find out from Kewell what sort of expectations he will have on a new manager next summer .

Will he be demanding the sack if he doesn't get 4th spot as well ?

"hello, is that Newcastle football club?

Yes, i'm calling to say that you've not spent 500 million and therefore are not allowed to get into the top 4"

What wrong ? Can you not answer the question ?

How long will you give a new manager - will you demand he gets sacked if he doesn't get 4th. ?

by **Thommo's perm** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:24 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

Newcastle are there on merit
The same way they wont be there come the end of the season because they wont deserve to be

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:25 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

They aren't in the top 4 .

If they end up in the top four instead of us Chelsea and Arsenal then I will come back on here and state how right you were .

but that goes against your MUST SPEND 500 million logic to get into the top 4....how much must you spend to get into the top 5? 400 million? top 6? 300 million?

I hope someone tells Stoke and Norwich :laugh:

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Thommo's perm wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

Newcastle are there on merit
The same way they wont be there come the end of the season because they wont deserve to be

no one knows who'll be in the top 4...but benny's loony logic that you can't get into the top 4 unless you spend 500 million is utter b0ll0cks and she knows it.

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:27 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

They aren't in the top 4 .

If they end up in the top four instead of us Chelsea and Arsenal then I will come back on here and state how right you were .

but that goes against your MUST SPEND 500 million logic to get into the top 4....how much must you spend to get into the top 5? 400 million? top 6? 300 million?

I hope someone tells Stoke and Norwich

Your doing a very good of avoiding the points, I will applaud you on that fact.

You also seem very capable of missing the point and twisting things to the point you are embaressing yourself .

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:30 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

They aren't in the top 4 .

If they end up in the top four instead of us Chelsea and Arsenal then I will come back on here and state how right you were .

but that goes against your MUST SPEND 500 million logic to get into the top 4....how much must you spend to get into the top 5? 400 million? top 6? 300 million?

I hope someone tells Stoke and Norwich

Your doing a very good of avoiding the points, I will applaud you on that fact.

You also seem very capable of missing the point and twisting things to the point you are embaressing yourself .

if you say so lady...

Your crazy logic that you need to spend 100s of million for sucess is b0ll0cks. Otherwise Newcastle, Norwich and Stoke wouldn't be anywhere near the top 10.

It's down to good mangement and a sensible transfer policy...

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:32 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I never said you needed to spend 500 mil to get into the top 4 - those sort of funds is what you need If you want to instantly get into the top 4 - if you don't have that then you spend a bit whilst building and taking time ( like Spurs ) .

so what are Newcastle doing up there?

they haven't spent 50 million over the last 3 years...let alone 500

They aren't in the top 4 .

If they end up in the top four instead of us Chelsea and Arsenal then I will come back on here and state how right you were .

but that goes against your MUST SPEND 500 million logic to get into the top 4....how much must you spend to get into the top 5? 400 million? top 6? 300 million?

I hope someone tells Stoke and Norwich

Your doing a very good of avoiding the points, I will applaud you on that fact.

You also seem very capable of missing the point and twisting things to the point you are embaressing yourself .

if you say so lady...

Your crazy logic that you need to spend 100s of million for sucess is b0ll0cks. Otherwise Newcastle, Norwich and Stoke wouldn't be anywhere near the top 10.

It's down to good mangement and a sensible transfer policy...

What success have those clubs had ?

How much money have the top clubs spent over the years to try and get success ?

Chelsea spent how many millions to enable them to win the title ?

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:45 pm

benny, your logic is flawed and you know it. You DONT need to spend 500 million to get 4th...otherwise you'd need to spend 400 million for 5th...300 million for 6, and so on.

Again, please tell me why Newcastle are doing well when they've not spent anywhere near the money you suggest is necessary?

by **RedAnt** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:46 pm

7_Kewell wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Who cares what Citeh did. They have unlimited funds. We dont have the funds to gamble 60 million, it cripples us, as shown.

the wearing tshirts was a bad move, everyone accepts that, hindsight is 20/20, at the time it was awesome, but it was the wonrg move to make

in regards to the T-shirt thing...we should have done NOTHING...SAID NOTHING...played it all out behind closed doors. Instead we made complete tw@ts of ourselves and portrayed our club in the worst possible light.

and why benny bangs on about City, i've no idea. We're NOT CITY...and if you waste 100 million on sh!te it hurts us badly because we've not got the funds to speed that money again. That's why we're struggling this season and that's why we are persisting with the likes of Carroll, Henderon and Downing.

I think a lot of the teeshirt wearing situation was about supporting Suarez so if/when the likes of City and Chelski come knocking, we can say "Hey, remember that time...?"

There's also a belief in football that if we can unite our team against the world, it will instill a team ethic. In the whole Suarez-Evra situation, it was certainly backs to the wall stuff. It was nice to see such unity. If we were getting the results, we could say that tactic had worked.

by **7_Kewell** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:49 pm

RedAnt wrote:
7_Kewell wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Who cares what Citeh did. They have unlimited funds. We dont have the funds to gamble 60 million, it cripples us, as shown.

the wearing tshirts was a bad move, everyone accepts that, hindsight is 20/20, at the time it was awesome, but it was the wonrg move to make

in regards to the T-shirt thing...we should have done NOTHING...SAID NOTHING...played it all out behind closed doors. Instead we made complete tw@ts of ourselves and portrayed our club in the worst possible light.

and why benny bangs on about City, i've no idea. We're NOT CITY...and if you waste 100 million on sh!te it hurts us badly because we've not got the funds to speed that money again. That's why we're struggling this season and that's why we are persisting with the likes of Carroll, Henderon and Downing.

I think a lot of the teeshirt wearing situation was about supporting Suarez so if/when the likes of City and Chelski come knocking, we can say "Hey, remember that time...?"

There's also a belief in football that if we can unite our team against the world, it will instill a team ethic. In the whole Suarez-Evra situation, it was certainly backs to the wall stuff. It was nice to see such unity. If we were getting the results, we could say that tactic had worked.

i hear what you're saying and the 'seige' mentallity does work. But we could have done that behind closed doors...there was no need to invite the criticism we recieved after all wearing t-shirts with Suarez face on

by **Benny The Noon** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:55 pm

7_Kewell wrote:benny, your logic is flawed and you know it. You DONT need to spend 500 million to get 4th...otherwise you'd need to spend 400 million for 5th...300 million for 6, and so on.

Again, please tell me why Newcastle are doing well when they've not spent anywhere near the money you suggest is necessary?

You really haven't read anything I have posted properly have you .

I will say it again

To break into the top 4 you need to to do two things

1. Be like City and spend a lot of money buying the best players in a short period of time - they have just done that and gone from 7th to 3rd in two years

Or

2. You spend a bit of money building a team step by step taking a lot longer ( 4 or maybe 5 years ) just like Spurs have done .

That is the situation clubs are faced with currently .

Newcastle are doing well because they got some good players who all found form - if they do get 4th then they will buck a massive trend .

Does anyone seriously believe they will get into the top 4 ??

Now hopefully you will read that and finally understand the point being made to you .
Which is

Just because we spent 100 million in 12 months doesn't automatically mean we should be in the top 4 ! 100 million is peanuts compared to what teams have spent to get into the top 4 ( in a short period of time ) .

Now I have addressed you point can you please finally address a very crucial point of your opinion .

You state that ( demand ) that Kenny should go if he doesn't get 4th .

So if that is the case " what happens if the new manager also doesn't get 4th " - another sacking going by your previous demands ?

Liverpool FC Forum

Tactics, philosophy, formation, etc...

Who is online