bigmick wrote:I personally think we should give the manager every opportunity to turn things around. I think this for two reasons.
1. He deserves it.
Based on............? It's hard to disagree with lakes' 12 points, three more than Rafa has picked up in the last eight games.
bigmick wrote: 2. Unless it is categorically proven that he isn't going to do the business, no new manager will be given a fair crack of the whip. So keen are people to be proven correct, that any success he had would only be "Rafa's success really" and if he didn't start too well, they'd be all over him. No, lets give the manager every opportunity to make peoples minds up once and for all.
You could argue it either way, you can't "categorically prove" a manager isn't going to do the business any more than you can "categorically prove" he will. At what stage do you kick out a disruptive or truant child from school? Not first instance, but with plenty of evidence not much is going to change you consider terminal action. He's in his sixth season and has more obvious weaknesses than I care for.
Do the same people who defended Houllier to the death regret Rafa coming in? Point being the same arguments to keep Rafa would have applied when Houllier was in charge, when Evans was in charge etc. Did they get the fergie "seven years"? Did Souness? The argument "is there anybody better?" is lame, the goal is to win the league and the current incumbent isn't doing it. Either TRY someone else or accept being second, third or fourth best (at best)
I'm working on spending of the big clubs, and one or two little clubs like villa and the bitters to confirm or expose their fans' claims they spend zilch, over the time Rafa has been at Anfield. I need to do some more work on it as some fees are easier to establish than others. It should be by season so common myths about X spending more than Y should be exposed. spudz seem to be the biggest wasters, not a good points return yet big spenders. I think the only team to outspend us is Chelsea, although I haven't added Citeh in yet. Man Utd spend more per player on average, but less overall with less chopping and changing you would expect when a side has changed manager. I did think about including "net spend", but it means jac ksh it so quickly dismissed it.