Adam hamill - Time to move up

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Owzat » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:14 pm

"the two clubs reportedly agreed a ’significant’ six-figure fee."

I doubt it's THAT significant, not perhaps as significant as having a homegrown player we could name in our squad. Maybe better to have one or two kids in the squad, if not playing, rather than spending millions on English players who will gradually fade from the starting XI picture and move on
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby we all dream... » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:31 pm

Maybe he was not good enough to play for us now, maybe our coaching staff think he was never going to be good enough to play for us and if that is the case then fair enough move him on, that's what is best for the lad himself if nothing else. It still doesn't take away the fact that I'm disapointed that we keep getting these young lads to a good level and then end up shipping them out as they cannot make the step up. I hate to see young foreign lads coming in above the likes of Hammil and Spearing and in my clearly untrained opinion do just as adequate of a job that these young home grown lads could do...

Rafa and his team know better than I do so I will take the stance that what they are doing and have been for a long time is for the best of the club but it doesn't take away my disapointment that none of our home grown talent is getting up to the standard of fringe players like the likes of ElZhar, Degan, Ngog and Insua. (Insua is slightly different as he actually looks very good)
User avatar
we all dream...
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:56 pm

Postby Nando26 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:13 am

heimdall wrote:
Nando26 wrote:How is Hammill better them El Zhar? hes a morroccon international & i seem to remebr early on in the season him always replacing Kuyt (before he hit form) & changing the pace of games in our favour & people were calling for him to start games

I dont understand why people slag the cademy because hardly anyone gets through to the first team.
The Academy isnt a lab where we make world class players its thier to try & homne the skills of youngsters who may have a chance of making it. If the local lads arent good enough its not the academys fault. How the people find that so hard to understand??

If Hammill was good enough he would of been signed up by a hull city or a stoke but he isnt yet you think hes good enough to play for us!

Look you cant have it both ways if you want us to be the best we need the best players if the likes of Hammill Hobbs Anderson Threfall were in the team now wed be fighting for relegation & would you be happy then??

Jesus come on think about it for a second

Sorry but I completely disagree with you, the academy SHOULD be a lab for producing top class players, like how the original Ajax academy was. If it isn't that then what the feck is the point of it?? Of course not all players are going to make it but we have had zero players since Carragher and Gerrard and that is just wrong. Spearing given a good run of games might be every bit as good as Lucas, how will we know unless he gets a chance.

The point of it is so the youngsters that might have a chnace to make it for us have somewhere to train....i thought that was a givin

what do u want them to rent out an astro turf every thursday night?

Yes Ajax are a brilliant example but 1) we are a far better team 2) They priortize it hence why were a better team 3) They have less coompetion then we have to attract these youngsters

Every other top club has them & itll always be the same West Ham had afew top class come threw at the same time as did we united leeds city etc. no club constantly developes top-world class homegrown talent
User avatar
Nando26
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:41 pm
Location: Runcorn

Postby heimdall » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:41 am

Nando26 wrote:
heimdall wrote:
Nando26 wrote:How is Hammill better them El Zhar? hes a morroccon international & i seem to remebr early on in the season him always replacing Kuyt (before he hit form) & changing the pace of games in our favour & people were calling for him to start games

I dont understand why people slag the cademy because hardly anyone gets through to the first team.
The Academy isnt a lab where we make world class players its thier to try & homne the skills of youngsters who may have a chance of making it. If the local lads arent good enough its not the academys fault. How the people find that so hard to understand??

If Hammill was good enough he would of been signed up by a hull city or a stoke but he isnt yet you think hes good enough to play for us!

Look you cant have it both ways if you want us to be the best we need the best players if the likes of Hammill Hobbs Anderson Threfall were in the team now wed be fighting for relegation & would you be happy then??

Jesus come on think about it for a second

Sorry but I completely disagree with you, the academy SHOULD be a lab for producing top class players, like how the original Ajax academy was. If it isn't that then what the feck is the point of it?? Of course not all players are going to make it but we have had zero players since Carragher and Gerrard and that is just wrong. Spearing given a good run of games might be every bit as good as Lucas, how will we know unless he gets a chance.

The point of it is so the youngsters that might have a chnace to make it for us have somewhere to train....i thought that was a givin

what do u want them to rent out an astro turf every thursday night?

Yes Ajax are a brilliant example but 1) we are a far better team 2) They priortize it hence why were a better team 3) They have less coompetion then we have to attract these youngsters

Every other top club has them & itll always be the same West Ham had afew top class come threw at the same time as did we united leeds city etc. no club constantly developes top-world class homegrown talent

Ajax are :censored: now but they weren't 15-25 years back when they seemed to have a conveyor belt of great players coming out of their academy. The fact is our academy is producing sh1t players and there is no excuse for that, surely if you can get hold of kids at 8-9 then you should be able to hone a handful of them into top class players, or reject them early, before they reach 18. I just can't see why this is so hard. Maybe the problem is that we have too many kids at the academy instead of focussing the attention on the kids who really do have the abilities. I think it is fair to say that Arsenal and Manure are far better at producing players from their academies, whereas we are simply not good enough. If Rafa has no faith in the academy then we might as well shut it down as it must be a drain of money at the moment, that money could be diverted towards buying players from other clubs who have functioning academies.
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby GYBS » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:18 am

Do arsenal and man utd produce young players or do they spend a lot of money buying young players and developing them - wilkshire is the only arsenal player who has fully come through the ranks to look like he might make it - the rest have been bought or poached from foriegn clubs using loopholes - same with mancs who have gibson and wellbeck who look ok but the rest have been bought as well .

Rafa is changing the way the academy and maybe we will start to see results and some of the guys we have bought or brought throu will have a chance - there is already a decent amount of players there who look like they might have a future - nemeth,pacheco,kelly , then there is ecclestone,ince and a few mores .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:46 pm

RedBlood wrote:
redmikey wrote:
GYBS wrote:Shame he has gone as he looked very talented on either foot - certainly looked more talented and better than El Zhar . Hopefully there is some sort of buy back option .

here here . i feel exactly the same . el zar/ hamill
                                                 lucas/spearing

these lads need a chance, what if we had brought in viera when stevie was comin through, clubs don't give youth a start any more

why does spearing deserve a chance ahead of lucas?? really it baffles me how blinded some right wing people are

if spearing played as well as lucas did against athletico and scored you lot would be wan.king over him

Right wing? What the fuck are you talking about??

Since when does footballing opinion fall into the category of politics?

For the most of us, Lucas' performances have been at best average, at worse a liability. Against lesser opposition and cup games we would like to see a young lad with potential given an opportunity to cement his place in the senior squad.

Nothing wrong with that in my opinion.
Last edited by SouthCoastShankly on Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex

Postby Ace Ventura » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:09 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
RedBlood wrote:
redmikey wrote:
GYBS wrote:Shame he has gone as he looked very talented on either foot - certainly looked more talented and better than El Zhar . Hopefully there is some sort of buy back option .

here here . i feel exactly the same . el zar/ hamill
                                                 lucas/spearing

these lads need a chance, what if we had brought in viera when stevie was comin through, clubs don't give youth a start any more

why does spearing deserve a chance ahead of lucas?? really it baffles me how blinded some right wing people are

if spearing played as well as lucas did against athletico and scored you lot would be wan.king over him

Right wing? What the fuck are you talking about??

Since when does footballing opinion fall into the category of politics?

For the most of us, Lucas' performances have been at best average, at worse a liability. Against lesser opposition and cup games we would like to see a young lad with potential given an opportunity to cement his place in the senior squad.

Nothing wrong with that in my opinion.

Some people like to play that card all the time mate.

If we want a local player to succeed we have an ulterior motive  :no

The fact of the matter is, Lucas has had two seasons and hasnt been good enough, granted he has looked better in pre-season. But there were times last season that Spearing should have been given a go.
Thats not just me saying it as he is local either.
Image





ALLLRIGHTY THEN !!
User avatar
Ace Ventura
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3952
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 1:29 pm
Location: Birkenhead

Postby GYBS » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:17 pm

going by this pre season and the games i saw for reserves spearing wouldnt of offered us anything more than what lucas did and wouldnt of had the same impact that lucas did in certain games , been backed up with this pre season with lucas outperforming spearing in most if not all of the games so far , weather thats experience or ability is another discussion for me its a mix off both . Spearing hopefully will get some run outs in cc but see plessis and lucas ahead of him in pecking order at the moment
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:01 pm

GYBS wrote:going by this pre season and the games i saw for reserves spearing wouldnt of offered us anything more than what lucas did and wouldnt of had the same impact that lucas did in certain games , been backed up with this pre season with lucas outperforming spearing in most if not all of the games so far , weather thats experience or ability is another discussion for me its a mix off both . Spearing hopefully will get some run outs in cc but see plessis and lucas ahead of him in pecking order at the moment

I think your off your rocker, but hey everyone is entitled to an opinion.

Considering Spearing is 2 years junior to Lucas and most only see a marginal difference between the two speaks volumes for me. I firmly believe if Spearing was given 2 seasons in the first team, he would be miles ahead of Lucas.
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex

Postby GYBS » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:19 pm

SouthCoastShankly wrote:
GYBS wrote:going by this pre season and the games i saw for reserves spearing wouldnt of offered us anything more than what lucas did and wouldnt of had the same impact that lucas did in certain games , been backed up with this pre season with lucas outperforming spearing in most if not all of the games so far , weather thats experience or ability is another discussion for me its a mix off both . Spearing hopefully will get some run outs in cc but see plessis and lucas ahead of him in pecking order at the moment

I think your off your rocker, but hey everyone is entitled to an opinion.

Considering Spearing is 2 years junior to Lucas and most only see a marginal difference between the two speaks volumes for me. I firmly believe if Spearing was given 2 seasons in the first team, he would be miles ahead of Lucas.

guess we will have to agree to disagree at the moment and see what happens - i see spearing as a little Robbie Savage at the moment - lots of fights and harrasement but not much else from him .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby Kopite25 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:26 pm

I honestly think Lucas will prove alot of doubters wrong this season but that's another topic

As for Spearing i'm sorry but Jay doesn't look like a top 4 player to me in any aspect of his game and how anyone could want him playing CM with his stature is beyond me. He'd be bullied all over by top class players end off.

my 2 pence worth anyway
Shankly on boardroom meetings - 'At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques.'

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/9349/kkwt.jpg
Kopite25
 
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: UK

Postby Nando26 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:55 am

heimdall wrote:
Nando26 wrote:
heimdall wrote:
Nando26 wrote:How is Hammill better them El Zhar? hes a morroccon international & i seem to remebr early on in the season him always replacing Kuyt (before he hit form) & changing the pace of games in our favour & people were calling for him to start games

I dont understand why people slag the cademy because hardly anyone gets through to the first team.
The Academy isnt a lab where we make world class players its thier to try & homne the skills of youngsters who may have a chance of making it. If the local lads arent good enough its not the academys fault. How the people find that so hard to understand??

If Hammill was good enough he would of been signed up by a hull city or a stoke but he isnt yet you think hes good enough to play for us!

Look you cant have it both ways if you want us to be the best we need the best players if the likes of Hammill Hobbs Anderson Threfall were in the team now wed be fighting for relegation & would you be happy then??

Jesus come on think about it for a second

Sorry but I completely disagree with you, the academy SHOULD be a lab for producing top class players, like how the original Ajax academy was. If it isn't that then what the feck is the point of it?? Of course not all players are going to make it but we have had zero players since Carragher and Gerrard and that is just wrong. Spearing given a good run of games might be every bit as good as Lucas, how will we know unless he gets a chance.

The point of it is so the youngsters that might have a chnace to make it for us have somewhere to train....i thought that was a givin

what do u want them to rent out an astro turf every thursday night?

Yes Ajax are a brilliant example but 1) we are a far better team 2) They priortize it hence why were a better team 3) They have less coompetion then we have to attract these youngsters

Every other top club has them & itll always be the same West Ham had afew top class come threw at the same time as did we united leeds city etc. no club constantly developes top-world class homegrown talent

Ajax are :censored: now but they weren't 15-25 years back when they seemed to have a conveyor belt of great players coming out of their academy. The fact is our academy is producing sh1t players and there is no excuse for that, surely if you can get hold of kids at 8-9 then you should be able to hone a handful of them into top class players, or reject them early, before they reach 18. I just can't see why this is so hard. Maybe the problem is that we have too many kids at the academy instead of focussing the attention on the kids who really do have the abilities. I think it is fair to say that Arsenal and Manure are far better at producing players from their academies, whereas we are simply not good enough. If Rafa has no faith in the academy then we might as well shut it down as it must be a drain of money at the moment, that money could be diverted towards buying players from other clubs who have functioning academies.

exactly proves what ive said & they werent class for  a 10 years period

When kluivert, seedorf, davids all came through together it was a one off like every team has again like ive stated

Ajax are like Arsenal go out & focus on the best youngsters thats why thier known for producing quality ones

but look how its worked out for then yes they have amzing talent but they all have egos & theirs no leaders on the pitch

& united are the same

Rafas improved it no end & players like insua kelly pacheco bruna nemeth will prove that in time
User avatar
Nando26
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:41 pm
Location: Runcorn

Postby Nando26 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:57 am

when i say united are the same i mean they are now at a point were the youingsters they can bring in are of the top draw & cost 10+ mill

not the whole no leaders omn the pitch think
User avatar
Nando26
 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:41 pm
Location: Runcorn

Previous

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 74 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e