Liverpool FC Forum

by **adamnbarrett** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:38 pm

alessandromagno wrote:I think LFCland gives a good--free-- service actually. I'm no longer an e-season ticket holder, so I was glad to get the Kuyt interview there. Of course, this is far better as a discussion board--but I can't see any reason for the level of invective in the above post!

It's just the fact he has advertised his freakin site in about 4 threads and quite frankly it kills decent discussion in the threads.

by **alessandromagno** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:53 pm

Well he's just advertising a free service for LFC fans.

by **desperado0831** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:55 pm

Bellamy 9

Nobody beats him although he've been given many offsides. If he scores that means 10 for him.

by **Bad Bob** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:05 pm

I find it funny that a few people want Bellamy to calm down. Don't hold your breath lads--that's typical Bellamy...all fire in the belly! We don't want him calmed down because a calm Bellamy is not in the game. Now, I'm not saying I want to see him booked for dissent or anything but I love the determination in his eyes when he feels he's been cheated out of a legitimate scoring opportunity. Of course, West Ham started to grow in possession more as the game went on but had we held onto the ball a little better late on and had they continued to play their high line, I guarantee you Bellamy would have timed one perfectly and been on the scoresheet. And he probably would have taunted the linesman about it too!

by **adamnbarrett** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:08 pm

alessandromagno wrote:Well he's just advertising a free service for LFC fans.

but isn't it right that no advertising is allowed on this site?

by **alessandromagno** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:24 pm

Well if he starts charging that's different..but I think we should be open minded as long as he's providing (a very welcome) free service.

by **adamnbarrett** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:29 pm

alessandromagno wrote:Well if he starts charging that's different..but I think we should be open minded as long as he's providing (a very welcome) free service.

fair enough but I don't really think he should be advertising it on another forum. He could use soccerlinks.

by **Alanay** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:36 pm

I was quite excited with the way we played today (not the early 20 mins tho), full of pace, energetic and fast attacking game. The lads worked very hard, even I hardly notice the flaw, especially with Alonso who lost ball quite easier than usual, Aurellio who need to improve his defensive part pf the game. Someone probably need to remind him that he's actually playing as a defender.

by **davo_LFC** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:59 pm

Graeme Noble wrote:I think the Bellamy/Kuyt partneship will be our best strikeforce.

Although Robbie Fowler has done a lot for us in the past, he is our poorest striker.

by **Crouchamania** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:40 pm

Reina-6

Finnan-7

Hyypia-7

Agger-8 (mom)

Aurelio-6

Pennant-7

Gerrard-8

Alonso-5

Luis Garcia-6

Bellamy-7

Crouchy-8

Kuyt-8

Gonzalez-6

Zenden-N/A (not on long enough)

by **GOAT** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:44 pm

Graeme Noble wrote:I think the Bellamy/Kuyt partneship will be our best strikeforce.

Although Robbie Fowler has done a lot for us in the past, he is our poorest striker.

We havent got a poorest striker, they all have their qualities, we have fantastic options up front this season

by **onizukaeikichi** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:02 pm

fowler the poorest?

all of our striker we have now are quality
gonzales and aurelio have to buck up IMO they misspassed a lot today

by **MaccaLFC** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:04 pm

Mark was only on for like, 15 mins was it? Hard to get into the game coming on as sub, especially the pace it was being played at.
Not that kuyt struggled, mind.

Some of these ratings are laughable, you can't give Crouchey an 8 just because he scored the goal, and Aurelio a 5 who was much better for the duration. :angry:

by **adamnbarrett** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:05 pm

MaccaLFC wrote:Mark was only on for like, 15 mins was it? Hard to get into the game coming on as sub, especially the pace it was being played at.
Not that kuyt struggled, mind.

Some of these ratings are laughable, you can't give Crouchey an 8 just because he scored the goal, and Aurelio a 5 who was much better for the duration.

100% agree. I thought crouch was shite up until he scored the goal. Then he was taken off 5 minutes into the second half. Aurelio deserves at least a 7.

by **adamnbarrett** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:10 pm

Kopboyau wrote:Reina - 6 - looked good but their goal was embarassing
Finnan - 7 - teamed well with Pennant
Hyppia - 8 - (MOM) Solid in defence
Agger - 8 - Awesome Goal, Solid in Defence
Aurelio - 6 - Good hard Tackler, lacked a bit of Discipline
Pennant - 7 - Looked good when he got in behind defence
Alonso - 4 - Very Quiet. Passing lacked quality.
Gerrard - 7 - Not a bad performance, below his best though
Garcia - 6 - Set up Crouch. Wasted a lot of the ball.
Crouch - 8 - Looked solid on his feet. Well taken GOAL.
Bellamy - 6 - Unlucky. Should CALM down

SUBS

Kuyt - 7 - Involved in everything. Should Have Scored
Gonzalez - 6 - Still needs to get up to speed
Zenden - 5 - Not on long enough really.

Reina I agree with.
finnan i agree with.
Sammi and agger I agree with.
Aurelio deserves a 7.
Pennant I agree with.
Alonso deserves a 6 - he only made 2 bad passes.
Gerrard I agree with.
Garcia deserves a 5, he gave the ball away and wasn't in the game at all until he set up crouch.
Crouch is a 6, he was awful until he scored, then only played for another 5 minutes.
Bellamy deserves an 8. He ran his socks off today and his goal should have stood.

Liverpool FC Forum

Player ratings v west ham - What do you think

Who is online