Stevie is a great player, world class even. One of the best Liverpool have produced it quite some time. However, he had a really bad premiership season with us, and even though he is in the annals of Liverpool FC history with THAT win in Istanbul, it looks like LFC are being held to ransom to offer him a huge salary. Albeit, he deserves to be on a huge payroll, LFC just can't afford it, with the likes of Kewell not playing and still getting paid, it might not me worth the hassle of keeping Stevie around for the sake of it.
Inspirational, yes, for the most part. But when he has a clanger, my god, we all do. If Real Madrid make a bid for him, we might get quite a few of their players for the swap. Raul, JuanFran are the main two i would be searching for. It might look like we need to sell him to fund our summer signings. What do you think?
Opta analyse the G-factor
by Duncan Alexander
With fresh rumours that Liverpool may be forced to sell Steven Gerrard in order to raise the funds manager Rafa Benitez needs to rebuild the squad, there is a sense of disappointment amongst many Reds fans, keen to see their captain remain at the club.
But if Gerrard is sacrificed then it may not be the blow that some fear. Liverpool's Premiership record without the England midfielder last season was actually superior to the matches in which he played.
The Merseysiders recorded a win percentage of just 40 per cent when Gerrard played, a figure that rose to 63 per cent when he was missing. The number of goals Liverpool scored per game was also higher when Gerrard was not playing.
It was a similar (though less pronounced) trend in 2003-04, when Liverpool again had a superior win percentage when their midfield dynamo was not in the team.
That is not to say that Gerrard would not be missed at Anfield, just that his departure need not be a crushing setback for Rafa Benitez's European champions.