Reg » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:59 am wrote:What if they do decide to refurbish Anfield and build extensions (how tacky....) and true to form teh Yanks sell naming rights to pay for it.
Have folks considered the impact of renaming Anfield. Rename a new stadium ok, but rename Anfield. Now that would be vulgar.
Reg » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:59 am wrote:What if they do decide to refurbish Anfield and build extensions (how tacky....) and true to form teh Yanks sell naming rights to pay for it.
Have folks considered the impact of renaming Anfield. Rename a new stadium ok, but rename Anfield. Now that would be vulgar.
D___C » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:41 am wrote:Build extensions.... "how tacky"?
What "tacky" like Old Trafford?
I will have some "tacky" please.
Reg » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:11 am wrote:D___C » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:41 am wrote:Build extensions.... "how tacky"?
What "tacky" like Old Trafford?
I will have some "tacky" please.
The Anfield site is too small, the roads don't allow proper expansion, the local infrastructure don't allow it and all you're doing is cobbling together a temporary solution that'll need addressing again in 15 years when the surveyors announce after 75 years there are major structural issues with the Kop foundations etc... I don't understand why the club is afraid of committing to a new stadium, the LFC 'brand' we hear about is rocksolid and will maintain a firm consumer cashcow in for the next 100 years. The only downside is successive incompetent owners and managers who have failed to build a properly structured financial base for expansion. We cling on to Anfield when we should be in the best stadium in the country.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.