LFC1990 » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:09 pm wrote:Suarez was willing to stick by us when we needed him No CL football to offer him.
How about we stick by him
lakes10 » Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:22 pm wrote:LFC1990 » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:09 pm wrote:Suarez was willing to stick by us when we needed him No CL football to offer him.
How about we stick by him
er no. if it was any club they would take a strong stand of this, we should do the same. a few ways we can go, we can add our own ban of 5 to ten games to what the fa give him, gut his wage for 10 weeks. send him on an anger course.
Santa » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:21 pm wrote:Now expect lakes10 to work double shift with his brand of pessimism and non-stop anti-Suarez chant all over...it's getting boring so why not give it a rest and see how the club will deal with this first, will you?
stmichael » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:28 pm wrote:back to the football.
thought first half was as bad as we've been this season.
all in all a draw was probably about right.
woof woof ! » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:15 pm wrote:stmichael » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:28 pm wrote:back to the football.
thought first half was as bad as we've been this season.
all in all a draw was probably about right.
Not sure if I go along with your comment about the first half St Mike , apart from the Chelsea goal I thought we were pretty much even stevens although admittedly as the half wore on Chelsea did start to get more into their stride.
I thought Henderson had a poor game especially in the first half, his performance (or lack of) let us down. I was surprised to see Rodgers take Coutinho off and keep Henderson on for the 2nd half. Although not my favourite I would have preferred to see Hendo replaced by Shelvey .
Penguins » Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:00 pm wrote:Well, I wouldn't mind him sold. He is a disgrace and what he has done is indefensible.
Return to Liverpool FC - Games
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 45 guests