Should they stay or should they go now?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Stu.Murph » Wed May 02, 2007 10:39 pm

dawson99 wrote:Nothing wrong with blind optimism and faith...it has its place, as do people like you stu.
striking the happy medium is the hard part. Yeah maybe Rafa this season has not had what he wanted. not gonna do ifs and buts about kewells injuries or anything.

i do believe that next season dirk will get a fewmore. i do believe that masherano has added a lot to our squad and that agger will improve with time. I think Pennant is starting to show why we brought him, as has arbeloa and Aurelio.

I also think that players have severely underperformed this season: zenden, gonzales, alonso at times.

The blind faith ones of s will hope it will gel together. the ones with the knowledge may want a whole new team (wwell 5 or 6 to make that champion team) what we need is the medium. 2 or 3 players to add, but to keep the team gellnig together as they are.

We need four first team regulars.

Two strikers, a left winger and a centre half. Simple as that. No more, no less.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby monkey 20 » Wed May 02, 2007 10:41 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:You'll see there isn't a great deal of difference with the exception that Houllier actually signed more than 3 players who improved the team in that time.


Tonight says it all Stu, no need for lengthy debate..............

Yes last night said it all...

You're totally correct. How could I ever doubt Rafa could bring home the league after last night?

Typical rose tinted specs brigade knee jerk reaction.

:laugh:

I responded to the comment (your last response):

'Compare Benitez and Houllier's first three seasons'

'You'll see there isn't agreat deal of difference'.

Last night proved my point, that there IS a significant difference, Rafa has achieved two champions league finals in three years - Houllier never came remotely close.

Benitez has achieved European football every season - Houllier was unable to do that.

Our league performances bar last season have been relatively similar to what they were under Houllier, if a little better (exemplified by last season).

Therefore the significant and most impressive improvement are our performances in Europe which in reply to your comment is why Rafa has shown empirical and significant improvement in comparison to the first three seasons under Houllier.

You seem to have a problem in comprehending my argument.

I just think pathetic arguements like "you don't know more than Benitez"

"you can't possibly say a player is a good or bad player because you aren't as qualified as Benitez".

Buts, ifs and maybe's a little bit boring and tedious.

Sitting on the fence isn't something I do. I learnt the game, I've played the game and I know the game inside out which is exactly the reason I can judge a players ability and potential, which is exactly the reason I understand tactics, ability, potential, youth players and such and such.

I also laugh at people who have the cheek and audacity to not call me a "true fan" because I do not blindly follow the current manager and I can see that his signings aren't of the required quality to win us the league (hence the reason we're 3rd and not first).

I've never for a second doubted Benitez as a coach or tactical expert. I sometimes believes he picks the wrong ones but thats understandable. What I question is his ability to successfully win a premiership title and build a team good enough to do so and remain a consistent threat over a period of time.

Last season we looked to have the potential. This season we look flat and ordinary.[/quote]
If you look at my argument as a whole, which you have not comprehensively responded to then I think you will see my points very cleary and in direct response to the points you have made. In your last post directed at me you have not addressed the points I made, for example........ I have addressed the point you made about the similarity of the first three seasons under Houllier to that of Benitez, I have shown the distinct difference between them and it is plain and clear in my argument.

Your perception of my argument is out of context, I was talking about Benitez in the context of his successes, his prior experiences and the evidence that supports his credentials e.g. two European cups in three years, an FA cup, a record premiership points total.

Please tell me exactly where I have questioned your personal credentials in judging the game. I have merely stated the credentials of Benitez, this is something you have misconstrued in your post.

Benitez is a top, top manager and we are not privy all the information he has at his disposal for example, what goes on behind the scenes, the reasons for his decisions or for example detailed scout reports that form part of the basis on why he signs a player. 

It is not about being 'boring and tedious', its about being realistic and contextual in assessing his performance as manager.

I do not blindly follow Benitez, I put his progress at the club in context, you do not, and that's the fundamental crux of the argument.

I have made my points very clear in my previous posts, you have never directly replied to them in context, or in a balanced way.

I have never stated that the signings Benitez has made are good enough to win us the league - that is an assumption you have made. What I have said is that he has made some quality signings, some poor signings, and some who would be too premature to judge. I have also put these signings in the context of a) the budget b) signings made by previous managers c) signings made by fellow managers.

You are entitled to your opinion as to whether Benitez is capable of building a side capable of winning the premiership - I have merely put this in context (yet again), for example it took Ferguson (at a time when the league was weaker than it is now) 5 years to build a team capable of winning titles on a consistent basis, at that time he had the largest budget in the league aswell. I am saying that I would rather wait another season or two for him to build his side and develop the way he sees fit. It would be crazy (in my opinion) to change the manager, of which there are none, who could replace Benitez under the circumstances and do a better job. It would throw us back another decade.[/quote]
stu you are being pathetic...lfc 2007 may be sitting on the fence slightly but he states the truth and great facts which are right!

:buttrock
monkey 20
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Botswana

Postby monkey 20 » Wed May 02, 2007 10:46 pm

but then again, so have you in your response...apologies. i think both view pull certain weight though...
monkey 20
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Botswana

Postby metalhead » Wed May 02, 2007 10:48 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:
dawson99 wrote:Nothing wrong with blind optimism and faith...it has its place, as do people like you stu.
striking the happy medium is the hard part. Yeah maybe Rafa this season has not had what he wanted. not gonna do ifs and buts about kewells injuries or anything.

i do believe that next season dirk will get a fewmore. i do believe that masherano has added a lot to our squad and that agger will improve with time. I think Pennant is starting to show why we brought him, as has arbeloa and Aurelio.

I also think that players have severely underperformed this season: zenden, gonzales, alonso at times.

The blind faith ones of s will hope it will gel together. the ones with the knowledge may want a whole new team (wwell 5 or 6 to make that champion team) what we need is the medium. 2 or 3 players to add, but to keep the team gellnig together as they are.

We need four first team regulars.

Two strikers, a left winger and a centre half. Simple as that. No more, no less.

Yep... but just 1 striker, a quality left winger is needed and an excellent center half.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Stu.Murph » Wed May 02, 2007 10:52 pm

monkey 20 wrote:but then again, so have you in your response...apologies. i think both view pull certain weight though...

:laugh:

Back track of the century!

:buttrock
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby monkey 20 » Wed May 02, 2007 11:01 pm

yeh, i hadn't seen your response to that stu...
i must say i agreed, it just seems now that liverpool are seen more of a force than under houllier. maybe im under an illusion, but i reckon teams are much more intimidated by the liverpool today. that said, we can light it up in europe one day and be drab in the premiership another, that needs to be corrected! one thing that lfc2007 said was that it did take ferguson five years to bring a major trophy back to the scum with the biggest budget in the league. benitez is now competing against clubs with much bigger budgets! lets hope the new owners can change all that (not being like chelsea, but with perspective....)
monkey 20
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Botswana

Postby jaytoothetee » Wed May 02, 2007 11:13 pm

redtrader74 wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:
metalhead wrote:We didn't qualify to the Champions league in Houllier's first season did we?

We finished 4th. The champions league places went as far down as third.

So we did not qualify for champions league is the answer

but chelsea weren't around at the time... and leeds were in the champions league places. oh, how times change  :oh:
Image

One time, I saw a man looking at me, yes, with his eyes. And then, he, he picked up a tube. And he looked, in the tube, and he made the moon big, inside the tube. The moon big inside a tube! Waahaha... Aaah. Telescope.
User avatar
jaytoothetee
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Lancashire

Postby Stu.Murph » Wed May 02, 2007 11:16 pm

monkey 20 wrote:yeh, i hadn't seen your response to that stu...
i must say i agreed, it just seems now that liverpool are seen more of a force than under houllier. maybe im under an illusion, but i reckon teams are much more intimidated by the liverpool today. that said, we can light it up in europe one day and be drab in the premiership another, that needs to be corrected! one thing that lfc2007 said was that it did take ferguson five years to bring a major trophy back to the scum with the biggest budget in the league. benitez is now competing against clubs with much bigger budgets! lets hope the new owners can change all that (not being like chelsea, but with perspective....)

The fact is budgets aren't everything. Its about how and where you spend the money available.

Vieira went for £3,500,000 to Arsenal. Gallas £5,000,000 to Chelsea. These players are out there.

The problem is Benitez keeps missing them.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby jaytoothetee » Wed May 02, 2007 11:28 pm

Stu.Murph wrote:Football is so misunderstood its unreal. You don't go from being a poor passer of a ball to a great passer of a ball, players don't change mould, qualities and attributes (unless its physical due to growth/age). A player like Alonso will always be a good passer with excellent vision, Steven Gerrard as a reserve still had an excellent strike, pass, tackle etc etc etc, he still gives the ball away cheaply and is occassionally tunnel visioned.

Players have never and will never ever as long as football exists become something they aren't and gain attributes they clearly don't have.

yeah, but no-ones suggesting that momo will suddenly become a fantastic passer, but he only has to improve his passing a little. if he gets it up to an acceptable standard, so he is able to tackle, win the ball and then play the simple five yard pass, most people will agree he is an excellent player. and yeah, i know that a player's strengths don't dramatically change overnight, but it is definitely possible that momo could improve his passing enough to make the difference between him being a good player or a great player
Image

One time, I saw a man looking at me, yes, with his eyes. And then, he, he picked up a tube. And he looked, in the tube, and he made the moon big, inside the tube. The moon big inside a tube! Waahaha... Aaah. Telescope.
User avatar
jaytoothetee
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: Lancashire

Postby Stu.Murph » Wed May 02, 2007 11:31 pm

jaytoothetee wrote:
Stu.Murph wrote:Football is so misunderstood its unreal. You don't go from being a poor passer of a ball to a great passer of a ball, players don't change mould, qualities and attributes (unless its physical due to growth/age). A player like Alonso will always be a good passer with excellent vision, Steven Gerrard as a reserve still had an excellent strike, pass, tackle etc etc etc, he still gives the ball away cheaply and is occassionally tunnel visioned.

Players have never and will never ever as long as football exists become something they aren't and gain attributes they clearly don't have.

yeah, but no-ones suggesting that momo will suddenly become a fantastic passer, but he only has to improve his passing a little. if he gets it up to an acceptable standard, so he is able to tackle, win the ball and then play the simple five yard pass, most people will agree he is an excellent player. and yeah, i know that a player's strengths don't dramatically change overnight, but it is definitely possible that momo could improve his passing enough to make the difference between him being a good player or a great player

No it isn't.

If you aren't a good passer at 22 years of age you NEVER will be.

End of.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby baryonat » Thu May 03, 2007 12:08 am

There will be no negotiation for the price.


Indeed
Last edited by Sabre on Thu May 03, 2007 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
baryonat
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: tel aviv

Postby dawson99 » Thu May 03, 2007 12:10 am

stu,
if u were the gaffer, who would u buy? whos got the skillz to make it? (not including ashton)

im giving you a transfer kitty of 20 million, plus u can get rid of a couple of players if u need more money
Last edited by dawson99 on Thu May 03, 2007 12:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby Stu.Murph » Thu May 03, 2007 12:15 am

dawson99 wrote:stu,
if u were the gaffer, who would u buy? whos got the skillz to make it? (not including ashton)

im giving you a transfer kitty of 20 million, plus u can get rid of a couple of players if u need more money

Its well known who I wanted.

Ashton, Tevez, Anelka and Woodgate.

Kuyt, Bellamy, Crouch, Gonzalez, Zenden and Dudek should leave.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby dawson99 » Thu May 03, 2007 12:25 am

Id agree with 3, wouldnt take anelka, dont care what his ability is, he didnt fit in, only reason i can see why we didnt keep him. And id keep Kuyt for one more season at least, see what he can do, second season is the important one (i know, you dont rate the ability, but the goals will come)

woodgate would have been class. I do like the guy.

Tevez would be good, would like to see what he can do for us, fingers crossed west ham go down.
Just wondering, what about someone like Doyle? Think he could step up? Just someone to bang the goals in? Or do we need someone more than just an old fashioned striker?
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby Penguins » Thu May 03, 2007 12:33 am

Well, the part about Houllier achieved as much as Rafa the 3 first seasons is about some of the worst drivel I've seen.
And then stating that the European cup is easy to win?

LOL.

So how many english teams have won it ever?
2. manure twice and Liverpool 5 times.
It puts the best teams in the world against eachother and it the biggest club tournament there is. Since Rafa is a tactical genious we get a huge advantage when he analyse oppoents to death.
Houllier won the treble? Hmm, the mighty League cup and the mighty Uefa cup. A treble without the league title or European cup in it is no treble!
Houllier never once has gotten past the quarterfinals in the European cup, never. Only 1 of his big buys(Hamann) was a good one.
For one thing Chelsea is just a totally different team now than what Houllier ever had to face and never title contenders during his time.

I do agree with stu on some points though.
The league takes a different approach to win. it spells top quality, which the squad lacks. What I do disagree about is why that is so. For me it spells money!
You can whine all about the 30 million Rafa spend a whole year on 5-10 players not being top class. U get no argument from me. But that is what out main competitors can spend on one player!
So Rafa's only option to win is to try and play tactically spot on and that's not gonna work in the long run unless u got the quality.

Once again I agree of Stu's assesment of most players in the squad. Gonzales seems not there, never gonna be there. But I am also is against flogging a player after 1 season.
Sissoko I also agree with. Never more than a 4th string CM compared to our other options. At 22-23 he just has to be able to make a 3 yard pass. If he can't now then...
Agger I'm still undecided on. Maybe he could polish his defensive game a bit and he'd be good, but dunno about title winning good.
None of our striker are top class but that isn't so strange since none has cost over 10 million(compared to 24 and 28 for our rival top strikers) But you can't just replace them that easily. 2 new top class strikers who could upgrade the attack would cost about 50 million. And selling 2 would bring in 15-20 million.
Fowler I agree has class and ability but still my belief is that a striker has to be more involved in todays game and not just put a toe to the ball in the box and score a goal. U must occupy a whole defense, work and then work some more.
Drogba maybe be a chelski mercenary but he is a handful to any defense and lethal at scoring still.

Unless Rafa get the funds similar to our main rivals I'm not gonna go and call for the sack ever. he has done a superb job at with the resources at his disposal.
He still makes faults and tactical errors but so do all managers.
There is belief with the players again that they can beat anybody and win big things and something rafa is great at is to get the best out of :censored: players. but if the players :censored: from the beginning it's hard to make the world beaters game in game out.
I agree with Stu that we need many top class signings but these things cost huge amounts of money and not that easily done.
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2597
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kazza and 67 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e