hobbes wrote:My worries now is Morientes. Ciise couldnt score in 10 minutes- 15 minutes time he is palyed. Find. But Morientes plays a full 70 - 80 minutes yet doesnt score. Truly, lately, I find Morientes is playing in full force. He even comes and defend. Good. But he could not head the ball in the net. He could not nick a goal. Why. ? A bad spell? Is he experiencing what Crouch had?
TheoRacle wrote:Tbh when your team enjoys an average of more than 55% posession and has 14 shots each game any decent striker should be embarrased not to get well into double figures in a season! I'm still to be convinced though, that dollar for dollar we've got the best return on 7 million quid that we could have.
Don't get me wrong, I think Crouch is definately a good player but we've seen this season that we are definately missing a player who can convert chances more often. Crouch's strike rate (based on stats for all comps up to and including to Dec 18 courtesy of ESPN Soccernet) is 3 goals from 41 shots. The much maligned Cisse has 13 goals from 38 shots (and I am not particularly a fan of Cisse either), Henry has 13 from 54, Drogba 10 from 41, Owen 12 from 17 and for fans of Yakubu he has 11 from 29. The claim is that Crouch offers more than just goal scoring but I don't see a proportionately high number of assists from him either. Yes he has shown some great touch and laid off a few good balls that have resulted in goals but Liverpool fans are hard to please - we expect nothing less upfront.
At the end of the day, Crouch and his fellow strikers have some big boots to fill (yes I know - he does actually have very big feet but you get the gist!). As long as we're scoring a couple of goals each game we have the luxury of saying "Wow, what a great game Peter had, a couple of nice touches, he made a great chance for Stevie and wasn't he unl y not score from one of the 4 chances of his own?' But if the goals from midfield dry up for a week or two we'll all be saying where are our strikers again.
TheoRacle wrote:Tbh when your team enjoys an average of more than 55% posession and has 14 shots each game any decent striker should be embarrased not to get well into double figures in a season! I'm still to be convinced though, that dollar for dollar we've got the best return on 7 million quid that we could have.
Don't get me wrong, I think Crouch is definately a good player but we've seen this season that we are definately missing a player who can convert chances more often. Crouch's strike rate (based on stats for all comps up to and including to Dec 18 courtesy of ESPN Soccernet) is 3 goals from 41 shots. The much maligned Cisse has 13 goals from 38 shots (and I am not particularly a fan of Cisse either), Henry has 13 from 54, Drogba 10 from 41, Owen 12 from 17 and for fans of Yakubu he has 11 from 29. The claim is that Crouch offers more than just goal scoring but I don't see a proportionately high number of assists from him either. Yes he has shown some great touch and laid off a few good balls that have resulted in goals but Liverpool fans are hard to please - we expect nothing less upfront.
At the end of the day, Crouch and his fellow strikers have some big boots to fill (yes I know - he does actually have very big feet but you get the gist!). As long as we're scoring a couple of goals each game we have the luxury of saying "Wow, what a great game Peter had, a couple of nice touches, he made a great chance for Stevie and wasn't he unl y not score from one of the 4 chances of his own?' But if the goals from midfield dry up for a week or two we'll all be saying where are our strikers again.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 75 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.