Benny The Noon » Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:50 pm wrote:Greavesie » Mon Jul 29, 2013 7:41 pm wrote:Benny The Noon » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:28 pm wrote:So if Madrid came in for Suarez you think he would turn them down after going on about them all summer ? He would be away in an instant
He hasn't publicly stated as bluntly as Reina. You answer questions with more questions and fail to acknowledge genuine points
No the difference is Suarez has constantly go on about Madrid all summer into the press and come up with all sort of reasons to wanting the leave - if anything Suarez is the one playing it all out in the open. How many times to the media did Pepe say he would like the club to consider an offer ? I think this is the first time.
nice post.ConnO'var » Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:06 pm wrote:I would be taking reports bythe Independent with a large grain of salt.
That article smacks of sh!t stirring.
How can one expect any player who leaves due to a lack or performance or game time to be completely unbiased in their assessment of how the club is being managed? Are they going to give a glittering testimonial to the people who didn't rate them?
Nuri Sahin did well in the Bundesliga. He could not hack it in the Primera Liga nor the Premiership at the clubs he was at. With most unsuccessful situations, everything but the kitchen sink gets blamed instead of taking a retrospective look at one's self.
.But everyone knows about ‘the Liverpool way’, and this is not it. This is meant to be a club where individuals were respected, especially those who had earned it on the pitch. Honest conversation was always meant to be the solution, and difficult divorces managed in a calm and dignified way, but Reina found himself surprised and rather put out when Liverpool decided to move him to Italy.
It raises questions, not for the first time, about the man-management at Anfield these days. It may well grow out of the American owners, coming from a sporting culture where players are traded at the whim of the owners without much of a say for themselves.
Or perhaps it comes from elsewhere at the club. Brendan Rodgers has his own ways of motivating players but it is not clear that they all respond well to him. Early last season Stewart Downing was publicly criticised by the new manager and was not delighted by it
Redrider » Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:19 am wrote:.But everyone knows about ‘the Liverpool way’, and this is not it. This is meant to be a club where individuals were respected, especially those who had earned it on the pitch. Honest conversation was always meant to be the solution, and difficult divorces managed in a calm and dignified way, but Reina found himself surprised and rather put out when Liverpool decided to move him to Italy.
It raises questions, not for the first time, about the man-management at Anfield these days. It may well grow out of the American owners, coming from a sporting culture where players are traded at the whim of the owners without much of a say for themselves.
Or perhaps it comes from elsewhere at the club. Brendan Rodgers has his own ways of motivating players but it is not clear that they all respond well to him. Early last season Stewart Downing was publicly criticised by the new manager and was not delighted by it
To a 'Tee'! The club is not what it was!
Ian Ayre has no gravitas and Brenden Rodgers brings little of substance to the party!
Redrider » Tue Jul 30, 2013 9:40 am wrote:The point is that Reina was open about his preferences and the management did not respond with equal candour.
Redrider » Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:40 am wrote:The point is that Reina was open about his preferences and the management did not respond with equal candour.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 94 guests