heimdall » Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:43 pm wrote:RedAnt » Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:23 pm wrote:The way I see it is we have two options.
A) Say to Kenny "Ok, you have 3 months and £? for next season. If we're up there, then you can carry on. If we're seeing further decline, it's time to part ways..."
B) Kick Kenny out and employ some new guy (Limited choices here) who will have only a little funds and be expected to mould the current team into a working unit.
So assuming that everything this year is Kennys fault (something I hold no stock in) what reasons can people give for trying out a new manager? And would a third manager in two years not be tantamount to selling our souls and following the new, instant success way with the likes of Chelski and Man City being our role models? For me personally that dosen't even bear thinking about. I want us to remain true to our history and culture even if it means sacrificing short term (possibly even long term) success. Am I crazy?
You're not crazy and your heart is clearly in the right place but you are far to sentimental about things. The bottom line is that if you see something that isn't work then you need to improve it, and for me, and many other people that problem starts with Kenny and extends to his awful signings. I don't think we are a million miles form getting back into the top 4 but we won't do it with kenny, he just isn't good enough, irrespective of his passion and obvious loyalty to the club. I agree that managers need time but there have to be clear signs of improvement and with kenny you have to say that the opposite is true.
That's just it..sentiment and loyalty is the Liverpool way. And it's worked wonders in the past. I don't believe that football has changed so much in recent years that the old philosophies are utterly redundant. We should be using this challenge to unite and show the rest of the world that with support and integrity we can once again rule the footballing world. We should be showing Chelski and Man City that money means nothing if you have team spirit and comraderie. And that right there is the question again, but in a new form. Do we:
A) Sell our souls and join the likes of Chelski and Citeh at the top with the revolving door policy...
B) Or stick to our guns and stand tall having faith and patience, and hope that the good things in life are still relevant.
Seems a bit soppy when I read it back, but I guess that's sentimentality for ya
