Liverpool FC Forum

by **metalhead** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:32 pm

Back to our very best eh? :glare:

by **Toffeehater** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:33 pm

if we don't win this , all the good work against villa and spurs will be for nothing

by **Toffeehater** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:35 pm

half time , :censored:

half

by **metalhead** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:35 pm

very very poor first half

by **Dundalk** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:35 pm

Half time

How im still awake i dont know

by **JamCar05** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:36 pm

So then, not a single shot on goal for 45 minutes against Wolves

. We better up our game considerably for the second half if we aren't to lose more ground on fourth (Tottenham are leading Fulham thanks to Crouch).

by **Fauxy** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:36 pm

Forget Istanbul 2005, this is the most exiting match ive ever witnessed

by **OneHotRed** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:36 pm

Ok, so half time debate...theres nothing to actually talk about....

by **Zidane** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:36 pm

We look like :censored:

. Would have done better with Degen's energy on the right and Aquilani's link up play. Team doesn't seem to be gelling the only positive is that our defence still looks pretty solid, they're unlikely to score on us at least.

by **RedSi35** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:37 pm

Holby City was far more interesting....................................

:censored:

sake

by **OneHotRed** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:38 pm

Ian Botham walking through a ginat shredded wheat, eating a bowl of shredded wheat was more interesting.....

by **Scottbot** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:38 pm

We're matching them physically but that's about it. Our £20 million midfielder has been left on the bench due to another fixture being too tough? Maybe he will only play home games against teams that definitely won't kick him too hard. Not enough flair in this team. They're no Bolton (at their Allardyce best) and this isn't a Mersey derby so why send out an LFC that side looks set up purely to deal with a rough and tumble. This lot are (were) there for the taking IF we field(ed) a team that is capable of playing some football.

by **kunilson** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:39 pm

ive never seen so much heading of the ball in a single half of football.

by **fivecups** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:39 pm

Avi Cohen wrote:
fivecups wrote:
Avi Cohen wrote:Why do we insist with one up front?

Disjointed, our usual team of strangers.

Can't see the point in another striker when we can't keep possession with five midfielders.

At least Reira knows how to go forward rather than sideways.

But if we had another up there it gives the midfield another option on the ball and Wolves something to think about.

I can't understand why Torres plays up on his own either. Arguably the best striker in the world and he's played up front on his tod.

When did we become a long ball team? It's depressing watching these hopeful hoofs from Kyrgiakos and Carra that are easily defended by Wolves. Perhaps, if that's our only gameplan, 2 up front is the way to go but I'd like to see us try and win the midfield, hold possession for a while and stetch them a bit. Last season we owned the midfield.

It's the lack of fluidity and continuity that really gets me, like we're not a team at all.

At least Reira looks bright. Stevie looks off form yet again.

by **metalhead** » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:39 pm

Thought Maxi had some good link up, and thats about it.

Lucas was non existant today

Liverpool FC Forum

WOLVES VS LIVERPOOL - 26th jan 19:45ko

Who is online