Liverpool FC Forum

by **The_Rock** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:56 am

Reg wrote:Van Horseface is openly available as a cheap backup striker. Common sense if you ask me.

Yeah.........that would pi$$ off the manure fans.......

And he is a better finisher than owen.

by **bigmick** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:22 am

Funnily enough I wouldn't take Van Horseface. I kind of know of someone (you know the thing, taxi drivers best mate told a bloke who knows my best mate) who has convinced me that the particular type of injury Van Horseface has (feck knows before you ask although he did tell me) won't ever heal properly, and he'll be restricted to only a few games per season.

I would have taken Owen, but not Van Horseface.

by **Toffeehater** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:06 am

Ciggy wrote:When I said world class wingers well there arnt many around, but if John Terry goes to Chelsea I think Lampard will look for pastures new. So I think we should put a bid in for Joe Cole cause he would leave if they did, he has always spoken highly of us, and we couldnt do much worst.
Joe Cole & Tuncay are better options to have than Ngog & Voro.

Joe cole's just signed a new contract but he would have been excellent here

by **Toffeehater** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:08 am

bigmick wrote:Funnily enough I wouldn't take Van Horseface. I kind of know of someone (you know the thing, taxi drivers best mate told a bloke who knows my best mate) who has convinced me that the particular type of injury Van Horseface has (feck knows before you ask although he did tell me) won't ever heal properly, and he'll be restricted to only a few games per season.

I would have taken Owen, but not Van Horseface.

45 goals in 60 games for real is tremendous record even at his age

by **account deleted by request** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:18 am

I admit I look with envy on the money that Citeh are splashing around. If we had that sort of money I don't think too many would be complaining if we signed Villa, Silva and Aguero. Hopefully we can scrape together the necessary funds to buy the one or two players who will make the difference this season and not spend our time regretting we didn't have sufficient funds to buy the World class players we would all like but are unlikely to get.

by **heimdall** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:16 am

As long as Man City have Hughes as manager they don't really pose a threat, it is bewildering why they have not appointed a better manager, it must point to that fact that the owners know bugger all about football. I also agree that it is weird how many strikers they are signing.

But I am not jealous of them, why should I be, we are a much better team and far better club. :buttrock

by **NANNY RED** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:49 am

Im gonna state here an now i dont think City will finish in the top six, next season, an if im wrong yous can give me loads, an ill happily take it, They are not gonna do what Chelsea done, Chelsea had a lot of good playes already in there foundations, i would like us to have a few bob more of course i would just so we can go out an get the player who we want without any deal or no deal, But i wouldnt like us to become like city , An as ive said i think they wont finish in the top six,

by **stmichael** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:50 am

Bellamy's due a move anyway. He's been there 6 months.

by **dawson99** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:52 am

Adebuyout aint all that
tevez not prolific
the otehr 8... nowhere near what the 'top4' have

st mike of spongebbob is right about Bellamy.
I'm not jealous at all. Now if they spend the same at the back then it might get a bit squishy bum time but until then let them spend all they want

by **bigmick** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:56 am

NANNY RED wrote:They are not gonna do what Chelsea done, Chelsea had a lot of good playes already in there foundations,

Chelsea had Mourinho Nan, lets face it, that right there is the difference. Hughes is prooving that having sh!t loads of money isn't all there is to it. Mourinho arrived in the Summer and won the Premiership in his very first season with a record points total. Thats the difference, and if they get him in the future he'll very likely do it for them as well.

by **NANNY RED** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:09 am

bigmick wrote:
NANNY RED wrote:They are not gonna do what Chelsea done, Chelsea had a lot of good playes already in there foundations,

Chelsea had Mourinho Nan, lets face it, that right there is the difference. Hughes is prooving that having sh!t loads of money isn't all there is to it. Mourinho arrived in the Summer and won the Premiership in his very first season with a record points total. Thats the difference, and if they get him in the future he'll very likely do it for them as well.

See thats one thing i dont agree with Mick. Dont forget Ranieri had just brought in a few good players when he was sacked, i thought he was an exellent manager an all, So he never got the benefit of being manager to the players hed just signed,

by **ElNino9** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:11 am

I am jealous of City. There owners are :censored:

rich and they can afford any player in the world.

by **dawson99** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:12 am

ElNino9 wrote:I am jealous of City. There owners are rich and they can afford any player in the world.

You wanna buy the league? Or earn the league?

It will be so muich sweeter winning the league without the billions of citeh or cheatski

by **ElNino9** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:14 am

Maybe not buy the league but buy a couple of qwality players we desperately need.

by **dawson99** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:15 am

we spent 18 mill no a right back, we're hardly paupers mate

Liverpool FC Forum

Im not a jealous type but

Who is online