

neil wrote:sorry mick, a bit below the belt matehowever, regarding posts of oddity I think you have the upper hand there mate. Regarding my earlier post I used a slight poetic licence to emphasise my point, nothing unusual there, and the point remains that these teams are now somehow tarnished when in fact we brought about their periods of circumspection, Man U lost having led the game, Chelsea lost their home invincibles tag that hit them both very hard and I take issue with some posters overlooking those FACTS. I am also rebelling against this percieved 'happy clappy free zone' that you and your mate have instigated albeit possibly subconsciously on your part, I'm still not ashamed of it and thank god others of my ilk go the match and moreover were there in Istanbul at half time(although I wasnt
) I'd also like to add that I've seen Portsmouth with Diarra, Fulham, West Ham, Middlesb this season and while their near the foot of the division they are very good and clever football teams chocka with internationals, now tell me, am I wrong?
bigmick wrote:neil wrote:..I've seen Portsmouth with Diarra.../quote]
Diarra is indeed a good player, but 18 months ago he couldn't get a game at Arsenal or Chelsea so I'm not sure he's the best example to prove your point.
bigmick wrote:And Leons hahahahahahahah post is on there, about four below mine. No disrespect to him at all, but as I said the other day he's never posted a truer word on here. Looks like it might be an interesting thread to browse through actually, at least I hope I got my ridiculousness out of the way on the first page. I'll give it a read through
bigmick wrote:On a slight tangent with Keane, I wonder how people in the cold light of day view his signing? It's been said before that rafa has the fantastic quality of being a lucky manager (something which I wholeheartedly agree with) and when you look at his signings in the Summer last year, it would be hard to argue.
That we spent 28 million quid combined on Dossena and Keane is a matter of fact (and no I haven't seen the contracts, I wasn't present when they were signed etc but we can take it as a "presumed" fact anyway). Now most people have a view on Dossena (I personally think he is by a distance the managers worst signing) but few would agree that today he is either worth 7.5 million, or indeed was a good buy. Given the fact that Insua is obviously a fairly decent prospect and quite possibly better than that, unless he has developed out of all recognition over the last couple of months it's hard to see really why we needed the Italian. Particularly when you consider that Insua is already a better full-back than the "fishmonger", it looks all the more baffling.
In the case of Keane, we can conclude from the way that Rafa has handled him that he doesn't see him as a lone front man. You might also come to the conclusion that he doesn't see him as one of two either based on the last couple of weeks, but whatever, once again it's hard to argue he has either done fantastically well or was value at 20.5 million pounds. Some of us firmly believe that even though the Irishman was way overpriced, had we handled him better we would have got more return in terms of performance but that's kind of by the by really. Now Torres is back, and given the fact that Gerrard is quite simply undroppable (and in all probability playing in Keane's position while he's at it) it's hard to see Robbie getting too many games. This is particularly the case if we are going to leave him out when he scored two in three, so the question begs to be asked, why did we sign him then?
Now in the case of Insua, you could argue that he's suddenly got it as young players do sometimes. As such, you could argue that how was Rafa to know? We needed a left back to cover for the inevitable injuries to Aurelio and he simply bought the best one he could find. In the case of Gerrard being quite good though as an advanced midfielder/support striker, even those who believe he is "wasted" there and a better player in a different position would hardly deny that our captain was going to be anything but pretty good if he played there this season. This is particularly the case when you think we played him there during the "seeing of the light" period last season and formed a "match made in heaven" with Torres.
So now we arrive at a situation where we are top of the league and in with a great shout of winning it, despite spending 28 million quid on a fullback who is absolute garbage, and a striker who we won't play when he's scoring, and who can't get into the team if everyones fit. Were we not top of the league etc, there might be one or two questions by now about the transfers. Maybe's we should wait till we've won the league before we flog them off. That way, if we get 3 mill off some mugs for Dossena and 10 mill for Keane, nobody will give a feck about the 15 mill we've just spunked.
Lucky ManagerYou decide
s@int wrote:I thought that thread was actually a good discussion Mick. I remember when Gerrard was supposedly leaving (think it was the second time), Rafa was quoted as saying "lets go shopping", so you wern't on your own, even though everyone seemed to ignore your disclaimer even in those days.I also think that maybe there was an element of frustration in your sell Gerrard thread. It had been rolling on for such a long time that Gerrard was off, even usually sane people were begining to come out with some daft ideas.
I thought we were lucky back in 2004 that it was Owen that left not Gerrard, and nothing since has made me change my mind. Losing Owen was a bodyblow..... losing Gerrard would have been a catastrophy.
Back to Keane, I think he will get plenty of games this season, I just hope he starts to take a few of his chances. No one is going to offer the kind of money it would need to tempt Liverpool to cut their losses, (especially now Spurs have settled for Defoe), although I have heard rumours that Spurs are after Babel for £11million (don't laugh!) Something to do with us still owing them the majority of Keane's transfer.
bigmick wrote:s@int wrote:I thought that thread was actually a good discussion Mick. I remember when Gerrard was supposedly leaving (think it was the second time), Rafa was quoted as saying "lets go shopping", so you wern't on your own, even though everyone seemed to ignore your disclaimer even in those days.I also think that maybe there was an element of frustration in your sell Gerrard thread. It had been rolling on for such a long time that Gerrard was off, even usually sane people were begining to come out with some daft ideas.
I thought we were lucky back in 2004 that it was Owen that left not Gerrard, and nothing since has made me change my mind. Losing Owen was a bodyblow..... losing Gerrard would have been a catastrophy.
Back to Keane, I think he will get plenty of games this season, I just hope he starts to take a few of his chances. No one is going to offer the kind of money it would need to tempt Liverpool to cut their losses, (especially now Spurs have settled for Defoe), although I have heard rumours that Spurs are after Babel for £11million (don't laugh!) Something to do with us still owing them the majority of Keane's transfer.
Context is a wonderful thing S@int when looking back at threads. The bit I can't believe above all else about my post (even taking Sabes point on board) is that I was pro Morientes for 10 million. I slagged the poor bugger from here to kingdom come when he did sign (I thought he was absolutely awful and was probably the first to "come out" and say so).
Equally bad (although funnily enough it wasn't on that particular thread) was thinking we ought to sell Gerrard. It mau not be on that particular thread, but at the time I was coming to the conclusion that it was the way to go. Still, it was a good read and I agree with Luke that there's some classic Leon on there.
bigmick wrote:On a slight tangent with Keane, I wonder how people in the cold light of day view his signing? It's been said before that rafa has the fantastic quality of being a lucky manager (something which I wholeheartedly agree with) and when you look at his signings in the Summer last year, it would be hard to argue.
That we spent 28 million quid combined on Dossena and Keane is a matter of fact (and no I haven't seen the contracts, I wasn't present when they were signed etc but we can take it as a "presumed" fact anyway). Now most people have a view on Dossena (I personally think he is by a distance the managers worst signing) but few would agree that today he is either worth 7.5 million, or indeed was a good buy. Given the fact that Insua is obviously a fairly decent prospect and quite possibly better than that, unless he has developed out of all recognition over the last couple of months it's hard to see really why we needed the Italian. Particularly when you consider that Insua is already a better full-back than the "fishmonger", it looks all the more baffling.
In the case of Keane, we can conclude from the way that Rafa has handled him that he doesn't see him as a lone front man. You might also come to the conclusion that he doesn't see him as one of two either based on the last couple of weeks, but whatever, once again it's hard to argue he has either done fantastically well or was value at 20.5 million pounds. Some of us firmly believe that even though the Irishman was way overpriced, had we handled him better we would have got more return in terms of performance but that's kind of by the by really. Now Torres is back, and given the fact that Gerrard is quite simply undroppable (and in all probability playing in Keane's position while he's at it) it's hard to see Robbie getting too many games. This is particularly the case if we are going to leave him out when he scored two in three, so the question begs to be asked, why did we sign him then?
Now in the case of Insua, you could argue that he's suddenly got it as young players do sometimes. As such, you could argue that how was Rafa to know? We needed a left back to cover for the inevitable injuries to Aurelio and he simply bought the best one he could find. In the case of Gerrard being quite good though as an advanced midfielder/support striker, even those who believe he is "wasted" there and a better player in a different position would hardly deny that our captain was going to be anything but pretty good if he played there this season. This is particularly the case when you think we played him there during the "seeing of the light" period last season and formed a "match made in heaven" with Torres.
So now we arrive at a situation where we are top of the league and in with a great shout of winning it, despite spending 28 million quid on a fullback who is absolute garbage, and a striker who we won't play when he's scoring, and who can't get into the team if everyones fit. Were we not top of the league etc, there might be one or two questions by now about the transfers. Maybe's we should wait till we've won the league before we flog them off. That way, if we get 3 mill off some mugs for Dossena and 10 mill for Keane, nobody will give a feck about the 15 mill we've just spunked.
Lucky ManagerYou decide
neil wrote:![]()
but chelsea were wonderfully untouchable superflyguys for 50 years on the run till we beat them, now they're pi55 poor, man u won 2 trophies last year then added £30 million worth of goal poachin "magic" till we beat beat em, now they're the worst man u outfit since remi moses signed. Happy clapper alert!! We're a fantastic footy team still top of the league (after xmas) and havent we played all the top 10 away apart from manu? yes us, and now............enter Fernando Torres, some of you dont deserve it.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 76 guests