Robbie keane - [EDIT: On His Way Back to Spurs]

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby neil » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:07 pm

sorry mick, a bit below the belt mate :D  however, regarding posts of oddity I think you have the upper hand there. Looking at my earlier post I used a slight poetic licence to emphasise my point, nothing unusual there, and the point remains that these teams are now somehow tarnished when in fact we brought about their periods of circumspection, Man U lost having led the game, Chelsea lost their home invincibles tag that hit them both very hard and I take issue with some posters overlooking those FACTS. I am also rebelling against this percieved 'happy clappy free zone' that you and your mate have instigated albeit possibly subconsciously on your part, I'm still not ashamed of it and thank god others of my ilk go the match and moreover were there in Istanbul at half time(although I wasnt  :( ) I'd also like to add that I've seen Portsmouth with Diarra, Fulham, West Ham, Middlesb this season and while they're near the foot of the division they are very good and clever football teams chocka with internationals, now tell me, am I wrong?
Last edited by neil on Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
neil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:24 am

Postby bigmick » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:32 pm

neil wrote:sorry mick, a bit below the belt mate :D  however, regarding posts of oddity I think you have the upper hand there mate. Regarding my earlier post I used a slight poetic licence to emphasise my point, nothing unusual there, and the point remains that these teams are now somehow tarnished when in fact we brought about their periods of circumspection, Man U lost having led the game, Chelsea lost their home invincibles tag that hit them both very hard and I take issue with some posters overlooking those FACTS. I am also rebelling against this percieved 'happy clappy free zone' that you and your mate have instigated albeit possibly subconsciously on your part, I'm still not ashamed of it and thank god others of my ilk go the match and moreover were there in Istanbul at half time(although I wasnt  :( ) I'd also like to add that I've seen Portsmouth with Diarra, Fulham, West Ham, Middlesb this season and while their near the foot of the division they are very good and clever football teams chocka with internationals, now tell me, am I wrong?

Not below the belt at all, I'd have kept the thread back for a better opportunity to bring it out but nontheless, there are some gem suggestions in the first post on it. Being pedantic (who me?) I could argue that SWP is better than any right midfielder we've had over the four seasons with the exception of Gerrard, Parker is better than Lucas and Earnshaw better than N'gog or Voronin, while two of the others (Pennant and Morientes) we actually signed. Damien Francis was a bit of a flier, but was suggested on another thread in answer to a "if you only had 1 million to spend" question if I remember rightly. Leaving really only Ledley King who was/is top clas when he's fit.  Anyways good find :D although I did give a bit of a clue on here the other day.

As for your point about the current league, if you are suggesting it is a strong one relatively/historically, I think you are wrong yes. We did do this question at length in another thread at some length, so briefly my view is that the league lacks a really outstanding team this season. Teams beating each other doesn't prove quality, it proves that the teams have less to choose between them (the Championship is massively competitive but not full of quality). While it's definately true that teams below the big four have good players, in my opinion if you compare say Hull at 8th with teams which were 8th at Christmas previously, they wouldn't stack up too well.

I would though repeat what I said twice in a previous post (not one form 4 years ago either :D) that in terms of achievement, it matters not a jot to us if we win the league. This is why I really couldn't understand the oversensitive nature of your earlier post. Does it really matter is the question. You think it's a strong Premiership, I don't but who cares as long as we win it? (might as well try and agree over something at least).

As for the "happy clappy free zone" bit, that "me and my mate have instigated", once again you've lose me there. Equally, I'm not really sure where you're goign with the going to the match bit, although I would say that even if I did, I doubt I'd change my mind on the strength of the Premiership. Diarra is indeed a good player, but 18 months ago he couldn't get a game at Arsenal or Chelsea so I'm not sure he's the best example to prove your point.

Anyways, good pick on the thread, sorry we disagree on the strength of the league/that the big four aren't in a vintage period with the exception of us thing. Strangely, I don't think me thinking this makes me a doomer and gloomer, nor do I think you disagreeing makes you "happy clappy". Not all opinions on football put people into one category ar another I don't think.
Last edited by bigmick on Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby Effes » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:35 pm

Have I missed something?

I thought this was a Robbie keane thread. ???
Image
Matt McQueen - Liverpool 1892-1928.
Only professional to - play in goal (41 appearances), Defence, Midfield, Striker, and later be Director and then to be Manager (winning a Championship) - at one club
User avatar
Effes
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4282
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:45 pm
Location: Garston

Postby neil » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:06 am

bigmick wrote:
neil wrote:..I've seen Portsmouth with Diarra.../quote]


Diarra is indeed a good player, but 18 months ago he couldn't get a game at Arsenal or Chelsea so I'm not sure he's the best example to prove your point.

I was referring to the Portsmouth team with the player as opposed to without(expcept man c) they were also very good on the night, compact, tidy, team of dervishes. There was an intersting interview with Wenger recently within which he went into detail regarding the Diarra saga, apparently the player felt he was worthy of being the 1st name on the teamsheet,  wenger took issue and shortly after another offer came in and he was gone, and having seen him in action(as with the other teams I mentioned hence the percieved insight- nothing more- nothing less) i feel the large transfer to Real Madrid was warranted. Not using the player to prove a point just distinguishing the team from then/now. Keanes is startring to worry me Effes but he has already served the season and momentum well with the strike against Arsenal.
User avatar
neil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:24 am

Postby GYBS » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:46 am

mick you mention hull being 8th as a marker for weak league but what about both reading and wigan in past seasons both being up at those dizzy heights around xmas ?
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby Sabre » Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:10 am

bigmick wrote:And Leons hahahahahahahah post is on there, about four below mine. No disrespect to him at all, but as I said the other day he's never posted a truer word on here. Looks like it might be an interesting thread to browse through actually, at least I hope I got my ridiculousness out of the way on the first page. I'll give it a read through :laugh:

Similarly we could remember the day you said "ANyone who doesn't see Kuyt is top class is completely clueless".

In fact, it's easy to look at the past and find funny things (I don't do it often because not everyone knows to take those comments in a good nature like you're doing), but you could never beat my prediction on Torres adaptation to England, so, don't worry Mick, I still have the Newkit TOP ONE :D

As for Morientes, your memory is failing you mate, as before coming here he was indeed a top class striker. Yes, he didn't triumph here, No, I don't think  Neil Mellor was better as Woof defended back then, but clearly he wasn't a success. But I can't blame you for wanting Morientes or Gravesen.

The interesting bit of recovering that old post, is not to prove we all make mistakes when we try to talk football, but, a question: Given what you asked, a striker, a defence, etc... we can say Rafa has improved and progressed the team since then no? That's what we were debating not that long ago. And I do see that progress.

In some departments like the left wing, he's taken too much time to bring something decent (we might remember here a player I liked like Gonzalez too :D) , but I think Rafa has consistently improved the team as time progressed.
Last edited by Sabre on Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby neil » Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:13 am

agreed
User avatar
neil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:24 am

Postby fivecups » Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:21 am

bigmick wrote:On a slight tangent with Keane, I wonder how people in the cold light of day view his signing? It's been said before that rafa has the fantastic quality of being a lucky manager (something which I wholeheartedly agree with) and when you look at his signings in the Summer last year, it would be hard to argue.

That we spent 28 million quid combined on Dossena and Keane is a matter of fact (and no I haven't seen the contracts, I wasn't present when they were signed etc but we can take it as a "presumed" fact anyway). Now most people have a view on Dossena (I personally think he is by a distance the managers worst signing) but few would agree that today he is either worth 7.5 million, or indeed was a good buy. Given the fact that Insua is obviously a fairly decent prospect and quite possibly better than that, unless he has developed out of all recognition over the last couple of months it's hard to see really why we needed the Italian. Particularly when you consider that Insua is already a better full-back than the "fishmonger", it looks all the more baffling.

In the case of Keane, we can conclude from the way that Rafa has handled him that he doesn't see him as a lone front man. You might also come to the conclusion that he doesn't see him as one of two either based on the last couple of weeks, but whatever, once again it's hard to argue he has either done fantastically well or was value at 20.5 million pounds. Some of us firmly believe that even though the Irishman was way overpriced, had we handled him better we would have got more return in terms of performance but that's kind of by the by really. Now Torres is back, and given the fact that Gerrard is quite simply undroppable (and in all probability playing in Keane's position while he's at it) it's hard to see Robbie getting too many games. This is particularly the case if we are going to leave him out when he scored two in three, so the question begs to be asked, why did we sign him then?

Now in the case of Insua, you could argue that he's suddenly got it as young players do sometimes. As such, you could argue that how was Rafa to know? We needed a left back to cover for the inevitable injuries to Aurelio and he simply bought the best one he could find. In the case of Gerrard being quite good though as an advanced midfielder/support striker, even those who believe he is "wasted" there and a better player in a different position would hardly deny that our captain was going to be anything but pretty good if he played there this season. This is particularly the case when you think we played him there during the "seeing of the light" period last season and formed a "match made in heaven" with Torres.

So now we arrive at a situation where we are top of the league and in with a great shout of winning it, despite spending 28 million quid on a fullback who is absolute garbage, and a striker who we won't play when he's scoring, and who can't get into the team if everyones fit. Were we not top of the league etc, there might be one or two questions by now about the transfers. Maybe's we should wait till we've won the league before we flog them off. That way, if we get 3 mill off some mugs for Dossena and 10 mill for Keane, nobody will give a feck about the 15 mill we've just spunked.

Lucky Manager ??? You decide  :;):

When I heard we'd signed Robbie Keane I couldn't believe we'd paid £20 million - I thought he was worth about £12 million. I think Rafa wanted to play a 4-4-2 more often and saw Robbie playing behind Torres and linking up with Stevie.

Dossena, so far looks like an expensive mistake. I generally try not to pass judgement when a players been at LFC for less than a year but with Aurelio now fit and Insua showing promise it doesn't look good for him.

So I think this is bad business in the transfer market by Rafa but remember we also made around £20 million in player sales with Crouch, Riise and others leaving the club. I think our net spend was in the region of £12 million.

Mick, I can't really agree with you're argument that Rafa is a lucky manager. I think over the course of 4 1/2 years you're luck will even itself out. In the more specific instance you mentioned I don't agree either. I could see you're point if the thing that had overshadowed our summer transfer dealings (the thing being that we are 3 points clear after 20 games) had nothing to do with Rafa - then he could be considered lucky. However our league position has more to do with Rafa than anyone else - its not lucky that we are top of the league.
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Postby account deleted by request » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:22 am

I thought that thread was actually a good discussion Mick. I remember when Gerrard was supposedly leaving (think it was the second time), Rafa was quoted as saying "lets go shopping", so you wern't on your own, even though everyone seemed to ignore your disclaimer even in those days. :D I also think that maybe there was an element of frustration in your sell Gerrard thread. It had been rolling on for such a long time that Gerrard was off, even usually sane people were begining to come out with some daft ideas.

I thought we were lucky back in 2004 that it was Owen that left not Gerrard, and nothing since has made me change my mind. Losing Owen was a bodyblow..... losing Gerrard would have been a catastrophy.

Back to Keane, I think he will get plenty of games this season, I just hope he starts to take a few of his chances. No one is going to offer the kind of money it would need to tempt Liverpool to cut their losses, (especially now Spurs have settled for Defoe), although I have heard rumours that Spurs are after Babel for £11million (don't laugh!) Something to do with us still owing them the majority of Keane's transfer.
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby bigmick » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:29 am

No FC I'm not saying we are top of the league because he's "lucky", not at all. The team we've had for the last couple of years is a good one, and the manager deserves huge credit for that. Equally, we are extremely well drilled defensively and allied to the fact we have two of the best players in the World in the team, (one of which the manager brought in with a fantastic piece of business) it's hardly surprising we are right up there. Added to that is the IMHO feeling that perhaps the other big four teams aren't quite what they have been recently, as well as the fact that we've rotated less and we are right in the mix.

No, when I say he is a lucky manager it isn't to belittle his achievements, it's simply to recognise that he has that essential quality, a bit of good fortune about him when he needs it most. It's been said before that had we not won that Champions League in his first season (whereit would probably fair to say we got our fair share of rub) that he'd have been out on his ear before now. The fact is though that we/he did it, we/he got that vital bounce when we needed it. This was the case even with the likes of Djimi Traore in the team (who once again I claimed in posts around that time that I quite liked should anyone want to search the posts out  :D).

The point about both Dossena and Keane's transfers not really working out (whoevers fault it is) is that it couldn't have happened at a better time for the manager if it must happen at all. To spend 28 million quid on two blokes who can't get in the team would bring huge criticism normally, but not when you just happen to be top of the league. That's my point about luck.

I did say a couple of pages back that I think the manager deserves credit for even getting us to the point where we challenge. Obviously if we were to win it, he writes his name in the clubs history (I know he already has for winning the Champions League). Anyway, thought I'd repeat that statemtn here just in case anybody gets the wrong end of the stick :) .
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby bigmick » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:43 am

s@int wrote:I thought that thread was actually a good discussion Mick. I remember when Gerrard was supposedly leaving (think it was the second time), Rafa was quoted as saying "lets go shopping", so you wern't on your own, even though everyone seemed to ignore your disclaimer even in those days. :D I also think that maybe there was an element of frustration in your sell Gerrard thread. It had been rolling on for such a long time that Gerrard was off, even usually sane people were begining to come out with some daft ideas.

I thought we were lucky back in 2004 that it was Owen that left not Gerrard, and nothing since has made me change my mind. Losing Owen was a bodyblow..... losing Gerrard would have been a catastrophy.

Back to Keane, I think he will get plenty of games this season, I just hope he starts to take a few of his chances. No one is going to offer the kind of money it would need to tempt Liverpool to cut their losses, (especially now Spurs have settled for Defoe), although I have heard rumours that Spurs are after Babel for £11million (don't laugh!) Something to do with us still owing them the majority of Keane's transfer.

Context is a wonderful thing S@int when looking back at threads. The bit I can't believe above all else about my post (even taking Sabes point on board) is that I was pro Morientes for 10 million. I slagged the poor bugger from here to kingdom come when he did sign (I thought he was absolutely awful and was probably the first to "come out" and say so).

Equally bad (although funnily enough it wasn't on that particular thread) was thinking we ought to sell Gerrard. It mau not be on that particular thread, but at the time I was coming to the conclusion that it was the way to go. Still, it was a good read and I agree with Luke that there's some classic Leon on there.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby account deleted by request » Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:26 am

bigmick wrote:
s@int wrote:I thought that thread was actually a good discussion Mick. I remember when Gerrard was supposedly leaving (think it was the second time), Rafa was quoted as saying "lets go shopping", so you wern't on your own, even though everyone seemed to ignore your disclaimer even in those days. :D I also think that maybe there was an element of frustration in your sell Gerrard thread. It had been rolling on for such a long time that Gerrard was off, even usually sane people were begining to come out with some daft ideas.

I thought we were lucky back in 2004 that it was Owen that left not Gerrard, and nothing since has made me change my mind. Losing Owen was a bodyblow..... losing Gerrard would have been a catastrophy.

Back to Keane, I think he will get plenty of games this season, I just hope he starts to take a few of his chances. No one is going to offer the kind of money it would need to tempt Liverpool to cut their losses, (especially now Spurs have settled for Defoe), although I have heard rumours that Spurs are after Babel for £11million (don't laugh!) Something to do with us still owing them the majority of Keane's transfer.

Context is a wonderful thing S@int when looking back at threads. The bit I can't believe above all else about my post (even taking Sabes point on board) is that I was pro Morientes for 10 million. I slagged the poor bugger from here to kingdom come when he did sign (I thought he was absolutely awful and was probably the first to "come out" and say so).

Equally bad (although funnily enough it wasn't on that particular thread) was thinking we ought to sell Gerrard. It mau not be on that particular thread, but at the time I was coming to the conclusion that it was the way to go. Still, it was a good read and I agree with Luke that there's some classic Leon on there.

Morientes was a funny one, the season before Spurs had offered about £10/12million for him ( before he went on loan to France). Had a great season with Monaco on loan. Almost everyone thought he was a surefire buy until they saw him play a few games. I was lucky , I saw him play on Madrids preseason tour of Asia before he came to us and he was absolutely abysmal on that tour(probably why they decided to sign Owen!) So I had more than a few doubts BEFORE we signed him.

I must admit I am slightly baffled by your liking for Earnshaw, but maybe he was playing well at the time?
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby bigmick » Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:34 am

I'd seen him (Earnshaw) play a few times for the Welsh national team and I thought he had great movement in and around the box, getting himself open all the time. I saw him get a couple against Scotland (might have even been a hat trick) and that got me onto him. Needless to say I got (probably correctly :D ) ridiculed at the time, but he then went on to score regularly in the Premiership, finishing in the top three or four that season in the "goals per minutes" column.

Though it was good fun at the time having a bit of a debate about him while he was scoring, it didn't detract from the fact that ultimately he wasn't good enough. I would still say though that he was/is better than Voronin and N'gog, so maybe he wasn't THAT bad. That was the thing then though S@int, and I think Neil did us all a favour by bringing that thread up, it was fun at that point to come on here and talk about football.

It's really strange this season on the forum. We are top of the league, us anti's have been proven to be maybe possibly onto something visa vis rotation "Rafa style", and it's my least favourite term so far on the boards. Quite innocent points about football in general are misconstrued into being attacks on players, the managers or other posters.

Hopefully we can win it this year and then everyone can calm down a bit.
Last edited by bigmick on Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby devaney » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:31 pm

bigmick wrote:On a slight tangent with Keane, I wonder how people in the cold light of day view his signing? It's been said before that rafa has the fantastic quality of being a lucky manager (something which I wholeheartedly agree with) and when you look at his signings in the Summer last year, it would be hard to argue.

That we spent 28 million quid combined on Dossena and Keane is a matter of fact (and no I haven't seen the contracts, I wasn't present when they were signed etc but we can take it as a "presumed" fact anyway). Now most people have a view on Dossena (I personally think he is by a distance the managers worst signing) but few would agree that today he is either worth 7.5 million, or indeed was a good buy. Given the fact that Insua is obviously a fairly decent prospect and quite possibly better than that, unless he has developed out of all recognition over the last couple of months it's hard to see really why we needed the Italian. Particularly when you consider that Insua is already a better full-back than the "fishmonger", it looks all the more baffling.

In the case of Keane, we can conclude from the way that Rafa has handled him that he doesn't see him as a lone front man. You might also come to the conclusion that he doesn't see him as one of two either based on the last couple of weeks, but whatever, once again it's hard to argue he has either done fantastically well or was value at 20.5 million pounds. Some of us firmly believe that even though the Irishman was way overpriced, had we handled him better we would have got more return in terms of performance but that's kind of by the by really. Now Torres is back, and given the fact that Gerrard is quite simply undroppable (and in all probability playing in Keane's position while he's at it) it's hard to see Robbie getting too many games. This is particularly the case if we are going to leave him out when he scored two in three, so the question begs to be asked, why did we sign him then?

Now in the case of Insua, you could argue that he's suddenly got it as young players do sometimes. As such, you could argue that how was Rafa to know? We needed a left back to cover for the inevitable injuries to Aurelio and he simply bought the best one he could find. In the case of Gerrard being quite good though as an advanced midfielder/support striker, even those who believe he is "wasted" there and a better player in a different position would hardly deny that our captain was going to be anything but pretty good if he played there this season. This is particularly the case when you think we played him there during the "seeing of the light" period last season and formed a "match made in heaven" with Torres.

So now we arrive at a situation where we are top of the league and in with a great shout of winning it, despite spending 28 million quid on a fullback who is absolute garbage, and a striker who we won't play when he's scoring, and who can't get into the team if everyones fit. Were we not top of the league etc, there might be one or two questions by now about the transfers. Maybe's we should wait till we've won the league before we flog them off. That way, if we get 3 mill off some mugs for Dossena and 10 mill for Keane, nobody will give a feck about the 15 mill we've just spunked.

Lucky Manager ??? You decide  :;):

Dossena was very highly rated in Italy and Liverpool were not the only club interested in him. Hindsight is simple and let's face it everybody wanted rid of Riise especially after the infamous last minute OG against Chelsea - Rafa must have been thanking his luck for that one! People now ask why did we get rid of Riise - hindsight? - lousy memories?

Insua - easy to say now why did we need to buy Dossena? - what if Insua was looking as nervous as Ngog? what would you be saying then?

Keane - ok I am not his greatest fan at £20m but nobody with half a brain would say that he hasn't made a major contribution along with Kuyt towards Liverpool's success this season. They have represented 20% of the teams outfield players for the most part in Premiership matches this season and if they were as bad or simply surplus to requirements as some would suggest we would not be top of the league.

Everybody needs some luck in all walks of life. I don't think Rafa is simply a lucky manager. Losing Skrtel and Torres through injury was very unlucky. Having players that could keep the momentum going through their absence was down to good management. But then again I suppose you would simply call that luck.
Net Spend Over The Last 5 Years 20/21 to 24/25  (10 years
are in brackets 15/16 to 24/25 )
LFC €300m (€420m)
Everton +€33m (€211m)
Arsenal €557m (€853m)
Spurs €571m (€684m)
Chelsea €945m (€1051m)
Man City €370m (€1038m)
Man United €687m (€1240m)
devaney
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 5140
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby devaney » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:45 pm

neil wrote: :down:
but chelsea were wonderfully untouchable superflyguys for 50 years on the run till we beat them, now they're pi55 poor, man u won 2 trophies last year then added £30 million worth of goal poachin "magic" till we beat beat em, now they're the worst man u outfit since remi moses signed. Happy clapper alert!! We're a fantastic footy team still top of the league (after xmas) and havent we played all the top 10 away apart from manu? yes us, and now............enter Fernando Torres, some of you dont deserve it.

Very well said  and how right you are that many of these clowns do not deserve our title chasing attempt! How they call themselves supporters is beyond me. They probably start the booing on the Kop when we go top of the league !! 

I sat if front of some foul mouthed brainless muppet at the Hull game who didn't nothing but have a go at Rierra for the entire game calling him for everything - personally I think he has been one of Rafa's best buys - NO DOUBT BIGMICK WOULD PUT THAT DOWN TO LUCK AS WELL.

And now Bigmick the anti has asked us to calm down whilst him and some of his mates regard Rafa as lucky or a clown. Ffs I give up
!!!!!!!!!!!!
Net Spend Over The Last 5 Years 20/21 to 24/25  (10 years
are in brackets 15/16 to 24/25 )
LFC €300m (€420m)
Everton +€33m (€211m)
Arsenal €557m (€853m)
Spurs €571m (€684m)
Chelsea €945m (€1051m)
Man City €370m (€1038m)
Man United €687m (€1240m)
devaney
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 5140
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Liverpool

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests

  • Advertisement
cron
ShopTill-e