Liverpool FC Forum

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:21 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.

Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

wasting your breath Em.

by **tonyeh** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:21 pm

Alex G. wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
Alex G. wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
bigmick wrote:A decent point, but why didn't we try and win it?

I think they did Mick, they just lack a cutting edge. It's been one of the problems all season.

We should have played with 2 up when Adebayor got sent off though.

You don´t need two strikers to play in more attacking role.
It´s a shame be so conservative with one more player. I think the players have fear to win. Feckin losers.

You do when the midfield won't follow through into the box and Liverpool's midfield tend not to follow through.

Liverpool playing with a single striker will mean we are always going to lack a potent attack up front.

That being said, I think playing with the single striker against the likes of Arsenal was probably the better move, but when Adebayor got sent off we should have gone 4-4-2 and finished them.

We should have been more agressive, going forward the midfield and the wings with decision, but Alonso, Gerrard, Leiva, Arbeloa, Insua, and Kuyt were too conservative, with fear, playing deep and slowly.
By the way, Babel was horrendous.

Babel is always horendous in a Right Mid position. He's not a right midfielder. He hasn't the control (or the foot) for that area. It's pure folly to keep playing him there.

With Arsenal down to ten men, we should have left Riera on and taken Lucas off and put Babel up front with Keane in a 4-4-2 for more attacking options.

Insua played a good game, kept his position well. I'd have him there over Dossena any day of they week.

Kut had his usual game. Run around, pass back or to the opposition and a couple of decent touches.

by **RUSHIE#9** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:21 pm

Bermenstein wrote:Anybody else like the combination of grey tops with red shorts n socks?

Nice blast from the past that. Reminded me even more of the late 80's early 90's. I think it was from when we played against the Villa in a similar combination. Better than that green 'n black malarkey I thought we'd have been in.

by **Alex G.** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:22 pm

jedwards wrote:A very negative tactics once again!!!!, Benitez might not was at the match in person, but he was on mobile phone sending his negative tactics to his coaching staffs and players a likes, very disappointing.

Another two points drops, which it eventually will hunt the clever Benitez way before next may!!!

I do not see what is the point to give this lousy manager new contract, the useless owners should wait to see if he achieve the main trophy by wining the league!!!!!!, which I very much doubt.

Two wasteful point once again.

You can blame on the manager, but it was the players who shi.t in their pants.
They were the guilties being so cowards. They have no "top of league" mentality.
A winner side would have cornered the rival in that situation of numerical advantage of players. Nothing to do with the manager´s tactics. It´s about champion mentality of a big club.

by **akumaface** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:22 pm

Damn, so many headline saying Liverpool hang on to draw a 10 man Arsenal team :angry:

by **Santa** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:23 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
Santa wrote:
Rorschach26 wrote:yeh a draw away 2 Arsenal

what a terrible result eh?!?

wtf are you babbling about? sure on the surfae a draw against Arsenal away might not be that bad a result but considering the circumstances the least we could do was to show our attacking intent instead we drop our pace, misplace more passes and generally run around doing feck all and not tested their keeper despite having one extra man. Rafa's negativity is starting to get on my nerve tbh

Aye, those three strikers he brought on were negative tactics alright.

you're having a laugh aren't you...taking off your winger who had a decent game and replace him with another winger who can't even control a ball let alone get pass one defender was brilliant tactical move...taking off you goal scorer and put your right a man who played on he right must be progressive then...and put in a striker with 2 mins left shows you really wanted to win the game...then Sherlock for your deep knowledge and insight to the game! :no

by **LegBarnes** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:24 pm

Santa wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Santa wrote:
Rorschach26 wrote:yeh a draw away 2 Arsenal

what a terrible result eh?!?

wtf are you babbling about? sure on the surfae a draw against Arsenal away might not be that bad a result but considering the circumstances the least we could do was to show our attacking intent instead we drop our pace, misplace more passes and generally run around doing feck all and not tested their keeper despite having one extra man. Rafa's negativity is starting to get on my nerve tbh

Aye, those three strikers he brought on were negative tactics alright.

you're having a laugh aren't you...taking off your winger who had a decent game and replace him with another winger who can't even control a ball let alone get pass one defender was brilliant tactical move...taking off you goal scorer and put your right a man who played on he right must be progressive then...and put in a striker with 2 mins left shows you really wanted to win the game...then Sherlock for your deep knowledge and insight to the game!

Yep he is clueless total waste of a poster. :veryangry

by **Petar** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:24 pm

Madmax wrote:
metalhead wrote:Lucas?!?!?!?!?!?

dont worry he will perform.

hahahaha,how people knows fukc all about footie,I just don`t know

by **Petar** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:25 pm

Petar wrote:I think we will not lose this one. I think that we have too strong defence and midfield for arsenal kids. 1-1-just because of negative tactics once again

people were bashing this post

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:26 pm

LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.

Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

you wouldn't know football if gerrard kicked one up your ar.se.

If you don't like good football go suport WBA.

In fact they play nicer football then us atm.

Just stop posting. You should know to call it a day when you're talking balls.

At the end of the day, nobody says how attractive the loser's football was. Football is a direct decedent of the Roman gladiator sport. Winner takes it all. Didn't matter if you looked good during the fight if you are dead at the end of it. Football - ditto!

by **LegBarnes** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:26 pm

If you think liverpool did ok today you need to call.

0800-IGOTRAPEDBYRAFAFOR5YEARSANDDONTKNOWWHATGOODFOOTBALLISANYMORE.

by **Alex G.** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:26 pm

tonyeh wrote:
Alex G. wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
Alex G. wrote:
tonyeh wrote:
bigmick wrote:A decent point, but why didn't we try and win it?

I think they did Mick, they just lack a cutting edge. It's been one of the problems all season.

We should have played with 2 up when Adebayor got sent off though.

You don´t need two strikers to play in more attacking role.
It´s a shame be so conservative with one more player. I think the players have fear to win. Feckin losers.

You do when the midfield won't follow through into the box and Liverpool's midfield tend not to follow through.

Liverpool playing with a single striker will mean we are always going to lack a potent attack up front.

That being said, I think playing with the single striker against the likes of Arsenal was probably the better move, but when Adebayor got sent off we should have gone 4-4-2 and finished them.

We should have been more agressive, going forward the midfield and the wings with decision, but Alonso, Gerrard, Leiva, Arbeloa, Insua, and Kuyt were too conservative, with fear, playing deep and slowly.
By the way, Babel was horrendous.

Babel is always horendous in a Right Mid position. He's not a right midfielder. He hasn't the control (or the foot) for that area. It's pure folly to keep playing him there.

With Arsenal down to ten men, we should have left Riera on and taken Lucas off and put Babel up front with Keane in a 4-4-2 for more attacking options.

Insua played a good game, kept his position well. I'd have him there over Dossena any day of they week.

Kut had his usual game. Run around, pass back or to the opposition and a couple of decent touches.

I´m talking about the las 30 minutes, until then we played really well, but when we were with one more player, the liverpool players had fear and were too conservatives. That´s not a champ mentality.

by **SupitsJonF** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:27 pm

Santa wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Santa wrote:
Rorschach26 wrote:yeh a draw away 2 Arsenal

what a terrible result eh?!?

wtf are you babbling about? sure on the surfae a draw against Arsenal away might not be that bad a result but considering the circumstances the least we could do was to show our attacking intent instead we drop our pace, misplace more passes and generally run around doing feck all and not tested their keeper despite having one extra man. Rafa's negativity is starting to get on my nerve tbh

Aye, those three strikers he brought on were negative tactics alright.

you're having a laugh aren't you...taking off your winger who had a decent game and replace him with another winger who can't even control a ball let alone get pass one defender was brilliant tactical move...taking off you goal scorer and put your right a man who played on he right must be progressive then...and put in a striker with 2 mins left shows you really wanted to win the game...then Sherlock for your deep knowledge and insight to the game!

Babel has bossed Arsenal before. I didn't think he would have a repeat performance but I didn't know he would be completely useless.

by **LegBarnes** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:27 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.

Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

you wouldn't know football if gerrard kicked one up your ar.se.

If you don't like good football go suport WBA.

In fact they play nicer football then us atm.

Just stop posting. You should know to call it a day when you're talking balls.

At the end of the day, nobody says how attractive the loser's football was. Football is a direct decedent of the Roman gladiator sport. Winner takes it all. Didn't matter if you looked good during the fight if you are dead at the end of it. Football - ditto!

Roman gladiator sport

:wwww

WTF you on.

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:28 pm

Petar wrote:
Petar wrote:I think we will not lose this one. I think that we have too strong defence and midfield for arsenal kids. 1-1-just because of negative tactics once again

people were bashing this post

Here, have one of these...

Chin, chin...

Liverpool FC Forum

ARSENAL VS LIVERPOOL - Sun 21/12/08 4pm

Who is online