You say there compatible, on paper maybe. But its been put to the test enough times to show it has never really sparked even the most rosey tinted lunetter wearer could see that.
Maybe if Xabi left, Gerrard wouldnt go back to the middle, but I'd like to think otherwise because I cant see any other area on the pitch where Gerrard is as good.
Fact. The team, not squad Sabre has largely been built around Alonso. The spine of the team consists of Reina, Carra, Alonso and Kuyt. Alonso has been at the center of the midfield for long time now, and IMO the team has been built around him when it should of possibly been Gerrard, thats my opinon.
No, I can't accept that as a fact without an explanation. The FACT that Alonso is the most especific midfielder of the squad, and by especific I mean not versatile, doesn't mean the squad is built around him.
If what I explained before is not valid arguement, here you have another one. Gerrard hasn't been moved around due to Alonso: Rafa says that until Mascherano arrived ALonso was the only holding mid we had because "Gerrard and Sissoko like to attack more". That's a quote more or less, I could find it.
Which means their roles are different. And which means Gerrard and Alonso do not compete for the same spot in the squad.
When Alonso and Gerrard played together, you say it didn't work. It didn't work because they play together or because the surrounding team alongside them didn't work together? It's a tough question, and it would be difficult to know the answer.
For me Gerrard has been played his not favourite position because of the greater good of the team. Should we have a proper RM and AM, then Gerrard would play in CM with no doubts. Meaning, if there's 2 places for CM, one is for Gerrard, and the other one, with another role, for Alonso or Mascherano. But Gerrard would have his spot secured, IMHO.
You see, I think Gerrard has been moved because Rafa relies a lot on his capabilities, not because he has to accomodate him somewhere. Time will tell who's right.