Should they stay or should they go now?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:10 pm

LFC2007 wrote:To continue.........

5) I have explained why achieving European football every season is a comparitive improvement. This is the BARE minimum of course it is, but it is not the 'BEAR' minimum because BEARS have no part in football! :laugh:
Again, very STU - ESQUE spelling.

Could Houllier achieve the BARE minimum each season? Could Souness, could Evans? No.

6) I have never said that winning the CL or FA cup has anything to do with the league, it just points out that we are making progress overall. The league requires different dynamics but, Benitez has at the very least matched what Houllier achieved in the league if not slightly bettered it, especially given that this is an EPL with the millions of Abramovich. A man that propelled Chelsea up a level, a level that Houllier did not have to compete with. If the European improvements under Benitez are the only distinguishing feature between the two records so far, then so be it, but that is some distinction in my book.

6) You are making an assumption that I am not going to hold Rafa accountable in the league, I have stated before, the league performances have been unacceptable this year. But, I have put this in perspective and compared the circumstances of the job. Something you seem to ignore. It would be speculative to predict what league position we achieve next season, nor would it be fair to judge it now. We still have a European Cup final to play.

7) When you say 'GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL'. I am assuming you are referring to a skull that has the ability to discern the difference between 'Weather' and 'Whether', as well as the same skull that recognises that BEARS have no part to play in football.  :laugh:

8) Regarding your amateurish points about player ability and Sissoko I would point you to a post made by Bad Bob in another thread. You also have a real problem in understanding what an opinion is.

9) Regarding your point about being paid £40,000 - £60,000 and adapting to a new environment. To say you wouldn't have a problem in adapting solely because of the money reflects on the type of person you are. Money is only part of life, it reflects on you as having a very materialistic view on life. Despite earning £40,000 players do feel homesick, they do have trouble at adapting to a new country, a new language and new people. Player's, despite all the help they have at football clubs, do have feelings and do have problems.Mark Bosnich, desite earning £40,000 a week, still suffered from clinical depression.It is an unbelievably narrow minded argument you have put forward.


10) Regarding Baros. You completely miss the concept of OPINIONS.
Read my post and I have explained this very clearly.


11) Regarding Kuyt. I would merely point to my last post and Andriy Schevchenko. £30m and arguably less impact.


12) 'My view is final at the end of the day because Reina and Alonso ARE the only ones that have improved our team'

Your view is 'final' In your opinion!!!!!!!!!!!!! You clearly have a problem with this concept.

Please also read the post mad by Bad Bob, it really does comprehensively answer: 'they would walk pretty much into any top team's starting eleven like Barcelona and Milan'.


13) I am not called 'Sonny', nor am I called 'Jim'. But, I am assuming that it is aimed at me. The matter of fact defines you to be nowhere near as qualified as Rafa Benitez, but that doesn't mean he is infalable, it just means his judgement is one that we should have a REASONABLE amount of faith in.

14) I'm not even going to respond yo your taunts, anyone with an ounce of intelligence understands my points, not just in this post but in my previous posts.

Finally, It's funny how this member sounds resoundingly STU-ESQUE yet his name is 'eds'. It is also funny how you enter as a 'guest' to try and support your own arguments!!! :laugh:

It's pathetic.

You're quick to critisise Eds spelling, aswell as my own and you can't even spell made!

:laugh:
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:24 pm

Whats even more amusing A.B. is you don't even know that 6 doesn't come after 6. :laugh:
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby LFC2007 » Sat May 05, 2007 6:30 pm

It's called a 'Typo' error. Even still, you've failed to distinguish between Wind, Rain, Sunshine and 'Whether' on a number of occasions. Not to mention 'Bear'!

It's funny how 'Eds' made the same analagy as you Stu about 'comparing apples and bananas'. It's so patently obvious it's embarrassing, you even go as far to log yourself in as a guest to try and support your own arguments!

Go Stu or is it Eds or Guest?  :laugh:
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Sat May 05, 2007 6:38 pm

Guest
Unregistered




  Posted: April 21 2007,17:16 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly i think it should be said that Robbie is and always will be a legend.

I agree with Stu especially now that no matter what,Bolton or Everton cannot beat us to a C/L spot.
I think it may be fair to say though that Fowler although not having many minutes on the pitch since his return has been good for our other strikers in training!


Raffa should give the lad the last 3 league games for Robbies pride and our memories!
It will be a sad day when Fowler leaves Anfield for good......Best player of a generation in a red shirt!





  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:50 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
eds wrote:Here is my retort to your ‘invalid’ and ‘unsubstantiated’ points:

“A response to your points.

1) His credentials as manager of Valencia are the reason he was brought here, they prove he has the attributes at the highest level. It shows Liverpool fans that this is a guy with top, top credentials and as such should have trust in him. I was not saying his successes at Valencia are a reason not to hold him accountable at Liverpool - they merely show why we should respect him and give him time to develop the club under new ownership - as yet he has had little time to do so.”


And when did I or anyone else state that we aren’t respecting Rafa for his past record? This isn’t a debate about that, it is a debate of what he has done so far and what everyone’s expectation is for the next year or two. I think giving him 4-5 years at the club is ample time to see what he has done. Next year will be his 4th year at the club if he delivers another 3rd or 4th finishing 10points or more behind 1st it will be another sign of him slipping, just the same way the goggled-eyed Frenchy lost it in his last few seasons. You keep trying to go off in tangents on your argument as I will point out time and time again.

”2) I did not say we should have blind optimism or blind faith towards Rafael Benitez, it is just a case of being reasonable and putting things in perspective. I remember the unsuccessful days under Sounness and later Evans in the 90's, we have come out of that period and are gradually rebuilding the club. I would draw analagy with how Man Utd were relatively unsuccessful a decade before Ferguson turned up, even then it took him 5 years to build his own side. Mourinho is an exception because he inherited top quality players and was privy to an unlimited transfer budget.”

If you don’t have blind optimism or whatever you want to call it, why don’t you accept everything that I have stated, as everything I have said is fact and have put EVERYTHING into perspective (for example Sissoko can’t pass – can’t see him getting any better, we haven’t come close to winning the premiership under Rafa yet, etc, etc ALL FACT).

As for you comments on rebuilding the club, we have been rebuilding the club for almost 2 decades now. Now lets just say that Rafa leaves in 2-3 years time without winning the EPL, will you still see us as rebuilding? Because I think that is a ridiculous argument to use, why bring up Sounness and Evans, what does that have to do with Rafa and Liverpool in 2007? Nothing? Another tangent you are waffling on about. I can see the parallels between Fergie and the Scum but he did it in five years and CONSISTENTLY showed improvement and that he was up for the task. If we use the Rafa barometer 5th, 3rd, 3rd(most likely) for the last three seasons (I won’t include points tally because that is even more embarrassing) next season is crucial because if it’s 5th, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd (or 4th ) I will definitely have a point won’t I?

”3) Yes, we have had a poor season by our standards and it hurts, but compared to previous league positions under Souness, Evans and Houllier - it is clear that we have made Europe 3 years in a row, won 2 major trophies and have our best players tied to long contracts. The evidence is there, it is a case of building, as I said before, without the funds Man Utd/Chelsea have had it is not going to happen in the space of two/three years. We didn't have the capacity to go and bring in players worth tripple the value of our highest signing like Rooney £27m, Ferdinand £30m, Veron £30m. It is with the help of the new owners who will bring invaluable marketing skills that we may be able to compete on a regular basis in the transfer market. “

Your arguments are flawed and full of holes. Under Souness and Evans reaching the champions league was much harder as you actually had to win the domestic title or if lucky finish 2nd? Has Rafa won us the League or even finished 2nd? Has he? Answer! The truth is deafening isn’t it?

We have made the champions league 3 years in a row! So what? This is a bear minimum for a Liverpool manager these days! We have won a wonderful CL final and an even better FA Cup final but what does that have to do with winning the league, surely you must understand there are different dynamics involved in winning a knock-out competition as compared to a 38 grueling round competition. They are different, as I have stated before comparing apples and bananas.

And as for your last statement wouldn’t you agree that we should now definitely hold Rafa accountable next season as he can now compete financially with the likes of Scumchester or Cheat$ki. Wouldn’t it look bad if he finished 3rd or 4th next season with the “he hasn’t had enough money to spend” card not being able to be used next season by the “In Rafa we trust” brigade, but as I have stated and keep re-iterating there will still be people on this forum next season saying “Almost there give him, a few more seasons?” Worrying, very worrying!

4) I was not comparing the attributes of Zidane to Sissoko, they have two very different styles of play. I was putting in perspective the time it can take to fully develop into a world class player. He was 24 when he moved to Juventus for £3m - it took him the following two seasons to establish himself as world class. We differ in opinion on the potential of Sissoko - fine, but nobody can categorically say he WILL be this or he WILL NOT be that, we are making subjective opinions and I have expressed my opinion. You seem to have a problem with this concept. To your remark re. 'the poor black man in England', don't you think if you went over to work in Mali it would take some adapting? Again, that was my point - nothing more nothing less.

Who said that you were comparing Zidane and Sissoko, what I said is that Zidane had mastered the game at a very early age, he had the ESSENTIAL skills to become a world class player. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL, you can’t become a world class player if you suck at some basic technical requirements; passing, shooting and offensive awareness. Sissoko lacks some very important basic traits, and no matter how much you harp on about his excellent tackling and energy this DOES NOT MEAN HE WILL BECOME WORLD CLASS! I won’t bother continuing my argument on this it is apparent you don’t understand this and never will, it’s NOT a subjective opinion because we have seen enough to judge that he is a good player but will never be anything more than that.

As for the “working in England” and adapting I am sure if I was being paid 40,000 – 60,000 pounds to this AND THIS ONLY I wouldn’t have a problem at all in adapting. I would also have world class facilities and trainers, language instructors and some very handy people at my disposal to help me settle in. So please stop with this ridiculous argument, he is a paid professional and blaming his ineptitude on things like this just shows you are clutching at straws and can not convincingly justify anyone why Sissoko is the way he is.

5) As I explained in my previous post, in my opinion Baros lacked fundamental attributes to become a top player. Sissoko, in my view is different, he has shown last season what he is capable of, that is why I make the distinction in class between the two players. In adddition Baros never came close to player of the season - last year Sissoko was a revelation, as backed up by some of the senior players such as Carragher who thought he was outstanding. I don't know which matches you were watching last season but he has shown he is capable of producing top performances. Reaching a definitive level of consistency at a young age is very difficult, that is why he needs time, he has dipped in form recently but the ability remains. Again - we can agree to disagree, no problem.

And yet here you sit back and admit Baros lacking fundamental attributes to becoming a top player, why can’t you see that Sissoko ALSO LACKS FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTES that make him a top player??? Why is your mindset so negative on Baros, yet when referring to Sissoko the rose coloured spectacles come on and you can’t admit that he sucks in some very KEY areas like passing, dribbling, shooting, etc. I will be impressed if you can answer this but I know you won’t because you have no answer for this and will go off into tangents like “Carragher thinks he is a top bloke bu/lls/hi..t” and judging his ENTIRE PERFORMANCE on how he can tackle everyone on the field doggedly and be judged as a “top performance”. The mind really does f.ar/kin boggle? ?????

6) Kuyt has shown some excellent performances, agreed that he could have scored more - he admits that himself but he has only had one season - you cannot judge prematurely. Owen, Rush and Fowler are natural goalscorers, they are unique. Thierry Henry did not light up the premiership immediately if you recall - I'm not comparing him to Kuyt just showing it takes time sometimes. When I say we lack cutting edge up front I am complicit with the idea that in the summer we need a natural finisher, that doesn't render Kuyt a poor player, he can still play a big part and I believe he will. Regarding the right mix of players, I am saying Kuyt can play a part in the attack when Benitez needs him, different games require different strategies. We can disagree over the utility of Kuyt, I have no problem with that but no-one can categorically state he WILL BE this or he WILL NOT be that - its a  matter of opinion.

I am not going to spend much time on this one as I agree with some of your points, but I am still skeptical on Kuyt as I don’t think he is a poor player in saying that if you admit he is a part player, don’t you think spending almost 10 millions pounds on a part player is very expensive??? I would rather have 2 very good forwards (who will set us back quite a bit) and as you say “unique” goalscorers. These players can make a goal from nothing, Kuyt is not this nor can he be used as a bit-part player, this role should go to Crouch who can be used more effectively in different formations and tactics due to his height and better scoring rate.

7) Regarding Benitez's spending I have explained my view in my previous post. You seem to think your opinion is final, exhibited in your view that only Reina and Alonso have improved the team dramatically 'end of'. In my opinion, Agger, Sissoko, Kuyt, Crouch, Mascherano and Garcia have also had as big an impact as Alonso and Reina. For example, Crouch has enabled us to hold the ball better in attack and creates for the team, something we lacked with Morientes and Baros. That is a notable improvement which most Liverpool fans can see during Benitez's tenure. He has made some poor signings as well in my view, but, when you consider Man utd spent £30m on Veron alone, that is probably the combined gross equivalent to what Benitez has spent poorly on. Again though - we differ in opinion on who is poor or not. You can only sign what is available at the time in the market with the budget you have. Do you think you are better qualified than Benitez and his experienced backroom staff in identifying what is right for the team and on the budget available? Who else do you sign for £2m when you are desperate for a full back? He would not sign a player if he did not think it was worth it.

My view is final because at the end of the day Reina and Alonso ARE the only ones that have improved our team, how you can possibly suggest Agger, Sissoko, Kuyt, Crouch and Garcia in the same breath just shows your lack of understanding of the game. Reina and Alonso would walk pretty much into any top team’s starting eleven like a Barcelona or  Milan the other players you mentioned would be lucky if they made the bench. The reason I haven’t mentioned Monster Mash is because I actually think he can become WORLD CLASS unlike Sissoko he doesn’t have the deficiencies that can hinder his development, but time will only tell.

As for your stupid question am I better qualified that Rafa or his “experienced” backroom staff, I will answer that I am? Using your ‘infallible’ logic I have to be as I have never been given the chance to manage Liverpool FC and until I do I can’t prove to anyone that I am better than Rafa. Ask a stupid question get a stupid answer!

A word of advice, sonny Jim don’t ever use the “are you better qualified than Rafa” in a debate because it makes you look un-educated and desperate in the fact that you have to resort to this ridiculous argument.

8) I was comparing the value of the signings made by Benitez to that of Houllier i.e. the same players were signed for the same money. For example, Diouf: £10m Kuyt: £10m Diao:£5m Sissoko: £5m. To compare the ones you suggested I do...... Diao: £5m, Zenden: Free, Diouf: £10m Morientes:£6.5m ,Cheyrou: £5m Gonzales: £5m.
The quality signings made by both managers I will compare in value and quality....... Hyypia:£3m excellent signing Agger: £6m excellent signing and future replacement for Hyypia, Hamaan: £8m decent signing better with maturity under Benitez, Alonso: £10m top quality young international, Sissoko: £5m excellent prospect proven ability, Mccallister:£? excellent experienced player, Reina:£6m record number of clean sheets but questionable in the air Dudek:£? Champions league winner under Benitez, Decent goalkeeper but too unreliable, Riise:£4m excellent signing, developed under Benitez significantly, Aurelio: Free  decent quality with left foot, injury prone, little chance to prove himself.
Overall I would say that the comparitive signings of the two managers sways in favour of Benitez and that the signings of Benitez have improved with time. Houllier was still signing players like Diouf and Diao - big money signings who were flops, towards the end of his time at the club.


Haha I laughing at you now because I have ripped your "arguments" apart and this one is not much better. Your ranking criteria is very subjective as I have already invalidated your previous argument by comparing Rafa’s best signings and with Houllier’s worst. Where abouts in your previous argument did you state you were comparing signings based on value and quantity, NOWHERE, you are just back-tracking! So you want to compare money wasted by both, then let me use my own criteria;

Rafa
FREE    Zenden, Nunez
2-5 million  Gonzalez, Josemi
5-8 million  Morientes,

Houllier

FREE         Litamenan and McCallister
2-5 million  Hyppia, Henchoz, Finnan
5-8 million  Kewell

See it’s very EASY to distort and mis-represent a one-sided argument using ridiculous comparisons, now stop it really your making a fool of yourself and can’t admit that you have backed yourself into a corner with this one.

9) Finally, I did not say 'Rafa's Demise' - you 'twit'. I said 'to constantly barrack him when his record is admirable and progress empirical is pathetic'. That is a fair statement, you are whining perpetually about his performance as manager, he shown his capabilities at the highest level at both Valencia and Liverpool. He is not infalable like you seem to think you are, he is doing his best under the circumstances to revive the success of the past. Like I said, it took Ferguson five years to fully establish a team capable of winning titles. Benitez has had two and a half years and he's already won the Champions league with an incredibly depleted squad, then the FA cup and a record points total in the second season. The third season isn't yet over, but sure it needs to improve in the league, it will come with time. You seem to have a problem in understanding that rebuilding a club takes time and is a process, it doesn't happen overnight.

You can continue to pick holes in Rafa for as long as you like, the real Liverpool fans who attend games and know the players are acutely aware of how difficult it will be to breakthrough to the top of the league but they share the belief that under the current manager it will happen. Ideally we would win the title every seaon but if the development takes two more seasons until we achieve it, I would rather be patient, supportive and constructive rather than oust the manager and wait another decade.

My criticism is constructive, analytical and in context, yours is quite the opposite, 'comparing apples with bananas' - real constructive and analytical that one!!!


How can you possibly state I am whinning perpetually about Rafa’s performance? On one single post? What planet are you from? Have you not heard the great things I have said about the man in my reply to you? Signing Reina, Mascherano and Alonso has been an enormous enhancements to the club, winning the CL league and FA Cup have been fantastic achievements?? Or have you chosen to ignore this seeing as it doesn’t suit your agenda?  When did I say I was infallible I used the arrogance in my debate as humour and to antagonize you, something which you are too stupid to understand as you have fallen into the trap of thinking that I think of myself as being “infalliable”, idiot of the highest order!

How long does this so called “rebuilding” need to take place? Haven’t we been rebuilding for the last 17 years now? He can win as many league cups, FA Cups and Champions League titles but in the end coming 3rd every year more than 10pts behind 2nd will not deter my views, thank-you very much.

As for saying that you are a “true” fan because you go to games and know how the players truly feel about Rafa. You have shown yourself to be a stupid, arrogant and assumption driven little prat. WHO DARE YOU QUESTION MY LOYALTY TO THIS CLUB BECAUSE YOU ASSUME YOURSELF TO BE BETTER THAN ME BECAUSE YOU GO TO GAMES AND HAVE A SO CALLED UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE PLAYERS ACTUALLY FEEL. FARK OFF!


None of your arguments are constructive, analytical or in context, they are all assumptions and mis-informed arguments driven by illogical or incoherent babbling as you go off into too many tangents.

If anyone has bothered to read my entire post, they can clearly admit that I have out-argued any so called argument, tangent or waffle that you have presented.

GAME. SET. MATCH.

A repsonse to your Stu-esque post...

1) I clearly state that 'His credentials as manager of Valencia are the reason he was brought here'. I distinctly point out also that 'I was not saying his successes at Valencia are a reason not to hold him accountable at Liverpool - they merely show why we should respect him and give him time to develop the club under new ownership - as yet he has had little time to do so'. AGAIN, I'll repeat it just for you. I am not saying we should not hold him accountable for his time at Liverpool, all I am saying is that there is a reason we should have faith in his ability. To your point about giving him 4-5 seasons, Ok I have no problem with that, that's the time it took Ferguson to build a title winning side.

2) You miss the point I make about OPINIONS. You simply haven't read it or can't understand it.

3) My response to this point is in my last post. Read!

4) Your points regarding Souness and Evans: The EPL is a much stronger league than it was in the 1990's, still Souness took the club to 6th and 8th place in successive seasons. Likewise, Evans record reads 4th, 3rd, 4th, 3rd, 7th. Over a decade in charge they added one League cup and one FA cup to the trophy cabinet. Progress?
Given the EPL was weaker at that time it makes it more incredible how were could manage such poor league positions. The EPL was weaker, hence, we had a lower UEFA co-efficent than other European Leagues (also due to Heysel), therefore we were allowed only 2 then later 3 UEFA champions league places. Therefore, the ability to achieve 2nd or third is proportional to the strength of the league. The strength of the top four in Europe nowadays is such that we are allowed a fourth qualification place

1. You stated they "prove his ability at the highest level". Clearly they do not prove his ability to win the premier league so what exactly are you on about? You are again mixing fact with opinion and you are cheeky enough to acuse both myself and eds of doing this ourselves?

No-one denies what he done with Valencia was excellent. No-one denies that was good enough reason to bring him here, christ, I even don't deny the mans a far better manager than Houllier was...

What we are not agreeing with is you saying "this proves his ability at the highest level". So far, he's proven he has the ability to help us finish 5th, 3rd and possibly 3rd again depending on other results, its not even in our own hands now.

2. Not even going to bother.

3. You again bang on about reaching Europe in Every season Benitez was in charge. In Houllier's first three years we made the champions league twice, the one time we didn't make it we finished 4th which in todays game, we would qualify. Now, Benitez has three out of three due to a rule change. Nothing else. A rule which was changed luckily enough to allow us to enter. You are the one who fails to acknowledge that as an arguement.

You're giving the impression of a "It doesn't matter how you qualify aslong as you do" type arguement. It matters, the fact is yet again, under Houllier we had an average league position in his first 3 seasons or 3rd, under Benitez its 3.66 re.

Benitez also inherrited a complete defence and one of the worlds best midfielders, with a few players with sell on Value. Which is alot more than Houllier inherrited.

4. You state the EPL was weaker, in some peoples opinions it was weaker. Not a valid arguement what so ever. Yet again using your opinion as fact.

5. I refere you to point 3. Absoloutely no way however will you understand the point being made. The fact is, again... FACT... read this statement very carefully because I'm only going to say it once, "had the rules not been changed to suit Liverpool FC, Benitez would have the same european qualification record as Gerard Houllier. Fact, no opinions in there as to weather its right or wrong, absoloute fact. End of.

6. It doesn't make out you are making progress overall what so ever. West Ham got to an F.A. cup final last season, they're now just above relegation. The cups have very very little bearing on the league.

6b. (Usually 7 comes after six) :laugh: Absoloutely pointless statement you make.

7. Brought a smile to my face but has absoloutely no relivance to the conversation what so ever.

8. He clearly has a point. Baros lacked the basic attributes of awareness, ability to pass a ball and intelligence to make a world class player, Sissoko lacks vision, ability to play a pass, lacks ball control and lacks technique. Neither player will ever become world class. Sissoko is pretty much exactly what we payed for, a £5,000,000 player. No more, no less.

9. Money only plays a small part? :laugh: Get real. No-one denies them not getting home sick etc and missing people. We all know they have feelings etc.

But the fact is they have the money to go and :censored: visit whenever they want, do what they want, when they want, how they want.

They can afford to fly all there mates over, they can afford to do anything. Having no money, no job, no life is cause for depression, Once or twice in my life I've gone through spells of unemployment, most of us have, with debts that mounted up, but to sit there and say that that kind of money doesn't help with things like depression is absoloute madness. Money isn't the answer to everything, but it helps a hell of a lot and anyone who thinks that these lads have any stress in comparrison to alot of people are deluding themselves.

They'll never be homeless, they'll never be in debt and they have a job they love.

10. See 8.

11. Schevchenko has :censored: all to do with Kuyt. Kuyt's shown very little apart from work rate. The FACTS are he hasn't done anything like enough to justify his massive price tag. The lads a decent player, not a great one. For £10,000,000 I expected a hell of a lot more.

12. Pointless comment.

13. So because someone who is more qualified to make an opinion on something you should respect their view and opinions on things that you disagree with? Well I point to Gonzalez. I knew this would happen with this player, yet the qualified one signed him, so I can't possibly be right about him? Or maybe it was just another lucky guess by Stu...

As was Pennant, Finnan, Carragher, Baros, Keane, Phillips etc etc etc.

You also state he's more qualified than us so we shouldn't pass opinion, well how about you stop passing opinion on my comments and show them the respect you're saying I should show you due to my qualifications? Oh no wait... that doesn't count does it... :laugh:

14. Me thinks you've been had by two posters who are alot more realistic and can see both sides of the arguement. I also think that your pathetic attempt to be-little our comments makes you look a wally as the only trick you seem to have comes from repeating yourself.

:kungfu:
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:51 pm

LFC2007 wrote:Guest
Unregistered




  Posted: April 21 2007,17:16 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly i think it should be said that Robbie is and always will be a legend.

I agree with Stu especially now that no matter what,Bolton or Everton cannot beat us to a C/L spot.
I think it may be fair to say though that Fowler although not having many minutes on the pitch since his return has been good for our other strikers in training!


Raffa should give the lad the last 3 league games for Robbies pride and our memories!
It will be a sad day when Fowler leaves Anfield for good......Best player of a generation in a red shirt!





  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:

Whats that meant to mean? ???
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:53 pm

LFC2007 wrote:It's called a 'Typo' error. Even still, you've failed to distinguish between Wind, Rain, Sunshine and 'Whether' on a number of occasions. Not to mention 'Bear'!

It's funny how 'Eds' made the same analagy as you Stu about 'comparing apples and bananas'. It's so patently obvious it's embarrassing, you even go as far to log yourself in as a guest to try and support your own arguments!

Go Stu or is it Eds or Guest?  :laugh:

Whats the matter lad?

Is it getting to you one or more people can see the reality?

:laugh:
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 6:58 pm

Oh I get it, you think that was me?

:laugh:

Well I got news for ya "sonny jim".

We'll number it as you seem to like doing... :D

1. Guests can't post on here.
2. I'd never in a million years say Fowler was the best player of a generation as EVERYONE knows I rate Owen higher.
3. I never call the boss "Raffa", I ALWAYS spell it "Rafa".
4. I don't have any alter ego's and never have apart from ones which the mods knew about, ask them if that "guest" (which i presume was Barry) or Eds has the same IP as me and they will confirm that for you.

So, " :laugh: "

At yourself. :D
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 7:01 pm

Oh and it was actually me who coppied eds saying of comparing apples and bannana's. Not the other way round and it isn't a metaphor I regularly use.

It just seemed appropriate at the time, anyway, like :censored: I have to justify myself to you, everyone knows my style on here and everyone can see you're clutching at straws because you're coming unstuck, so carry on. :D
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby LFC2007 » Sat May 05, 2007 7:02 pm

Really struck a nerve there Stu, or is it Eds or is it the mystery guest.

'Eds' is clearly the same person as 'Stu.murph'. You even refer to points that I made directly to 'Stu' in 'Eds' post, for example:

By 'Eds':

'They are different, as I have stated before comparing apples and bananas'

BUT it was STU who made the previous analagy about comparing 'apples and bananas' not 'Eds'.

I could go on and on about the strikingly similar vernacular not to mention the opinions which seem to mirror one another!
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Rafa D » Sat May 05, 2007 7:05 pm

Eds and Stu are not the same person.

1) he is not that sad to do that.

2) eds is from australia

3) I despise Stu and actually like eds :D

4) if you can be bothered look for a thread entitled - "Our we missing Harry?2 and from eds posts in their you know its not stu
Sammy Lee wears Liverpool undies
User avatar
Rafa D
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2888
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:17 pm
Location: Merseyside - Birkenhead

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 7:06 pm

LFC2007 wrote:Really struck a nerve there Stu, or is it Eds or is it the mystery guest.

'Eds' is clearly the same person as 'Stu.murph'. You even refer to points that I made directly to 'Stu' in 'Eds' post, for example:

By 'Eds':

'They are different, as I have stated before comparing apples and bananas'

BUT it was STU who made the previous analagy about comparing 'apples and bananas' not 'Eds'.

I could go on and on about the strikingly similar vernacular not to mention the opinions which seem to mirror one another!

:laugh:

I think someone needs to re-read the thread again.
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby LFC2007 » Sat May 05, 2007 7:13 pm

I'm not going to drag up every single thread and analyse it and I'm not going to waste my time on someone who's only way of conducting an argument or expressing a view is by being abusive.
You've been banned before, you've demonstrated how insulting you can be to other forum members not just me, it undermines everything you say.
You can go through life being an abusive bigot but it won't get you very far.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Sat May 05, 2007 7:21 pm

'Eds' is responding to questions that were aimed at Stu.

This proves it:

My post, in response to Stu.Murph's

"
) I was not comparing the attributes of Zidane to Sissoko, they have two very different styles of play. I was putting in perspective the time it can take to fully develop into a world class player. He was 24 when he moved to Juventus for £3m - it took him the following two seasons to establish himself as world class. We differ in opinion on the potential of Sissoko - fine, but nobody can categorically say he WILL be this or he WILL NOT be that, we are making subjective opinions and I have expressed my opinion. You seem to have a problem with this concept. To your remark re. 'the poor black man in England', don't you think if you went over to work in Mali it would take some adapting? Again, that was my point - nothing more nothing less. "


'Eds' Response to my Post'

"
Who said that you were comparing Zidane and Sissoko, what I SAID is that Zidane had mastered the game at a very early age, he had the ESSENTIAL skills to become a world class player. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL, you can’t become a world class player if you suck at some basic technical requirements; passing, shooting and offensive awareness. Sissoko lacks some very important basic traits, and no matter how much you harp on about his excellent tackling and energy this DOES NOT MEAN HE WILL BECOME WORLD CLASS! I won’t bother continuing my argument on this it is apparent you don’t understand this and never will, it’s NOT a subjective opinion because we have seen enough to judge that he is a good player but will never be anything more than that."

Now, it was in Stu's previous posts where he drew analagy with Zidane not 'Eds'. Therefore please tell me why 'Eds' would respond by saying 'I SAID' in response to my views about Sissoko and Zidane? ?????
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Stu.Murph » Sat May 05, 2007 7:21 pm

LFC2007 wrote:I'm not going to drag up every single thread and analyse it and I'm not going to waste my time on someone who's only way of conducting an argument or expressing a view is by being abusive.
You've been banned before, you've demonstrated how insulting you can be to other forum members not just me, it undermines everything you say.
You can go through life being an abusive bigot but it won't get you very far.

:laugh:

Yet again commenting on things you know absoloutely nothing about...

Keep it up. :D
Image
User avatar
Stu.Murph
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:32 am
Location: Liverpool

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e