GYBS wrote:yeah but how long do you persist waiting for the footballer to come out ?
bigmick wrote:I'm all for giving keane time too, but if we are going to go down that road, we need to fully commit to the policy I think. Leaving him out in midweek in a Home game in which he could very likely have scored was silly, as was pulling him off with half an hour to go while playing against his old team away. I seem to remember he also suffered from the "score a goal and sit on yer erse" syndrome in the next game after he opened his account.
We do seem to be quite adept at getting players into a state of mind, whereby they have little or no chance of playing to their optimum it seems to me somethimes.
Igor Zidane wrote:When crouch first came , remember the run he had before he scored his first goal , i think it was 14 games . People were screaming for him to be dropped and Rafa stuck by him . IMO Rafa will do exactly the same with Keane . It will come i'm sure of it.
s@int wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:When crouch first came , remember the run he had before he scored his first goal , i think it was 14 games . People were screaming for him to be dropped and Rafa stuck by him . IMO Rafa will do exactly the same with Keane . It will come i'm sure of it.
The problem is by the time Crouch started scoring, we had lost any chance we had of making a challenge for the league. We could be in the same position again if we continue to play an underperforming Keane.
Sometimes you have to make a hard decision and leave someone out, not for their own good ...... but for the good of the team.
I can't see how bringing him on as a sub can be much more damaging to his confidence than to keep bringing him off every game anyway. (Especially against Spurs!)
I would drop him, some people would play him through his "bad spell". I have no real problem with either option, I just don't think that we can afford to keep playing another misfiring striker if we are to mount a title challenge this season.
s@int wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:When crouch first came , remember the run he had before he scored his first goal , i think it was 14 games . People were screaming for him to be dropped and Rafa stuck by him . IMO Rafa will do exactly the same with Keane . It will come i'm sure of it.
The problem is by the time Crouch started scoring, we had lost any chance we had of making a challenge for the league. We could be in the same position again if we continue to play an underperforming Keane.
Sometimes you have to make a hard decision and leave someone out, not for their own good ...... but for the good of the team.
I can't see how bringing him on as a sub can be much more damaging to his confidence than to keep bringing him off every game anyway. (Especially against Spurs!)
I would drop him, some people would play him through his "bad spell". I have no real problem with either option, I just don't think that we can afford to keep playing another misfiring striker if we are to mount a title challenge this season.
aCe' wrote:s@int wrote:Igor Zidane wrote:When crouch first came , remember the run he had before he scored his first goal , i think it was 14 games . People were screaming for him to be dropped and Rafa stuck by him . IMO Rafa will do exactly the same with Keane . It will come i'm sure of it.
The problem is by the time Crouch started scoring, we had lost any chance we had of making a challenge for the league. We could be in the same position again if we continue to play an underperforming Keane.
Sometimes you have to make a hard decision and leave someone out, not for their own good ...... but for the good of the team.
I can't see how bringing him on as a sub can be much more damaging to his confidence than to keep bringing him off every game anyway. (Especially against Spurs!)
I would drop him, some people would play him through his "bad spell". I have no real problem with either option, I just don't think that we can afford to keep playing another misfiring striker if we are to mount a title challenge this season.
when torres isnt available i dont think that we have many other options but to play him up there and hope for the best...
Agree about bringing him off every game not doing his confidence any good...
He's obviously got talent and while he's been struggling to prove his abilities in a red shirt, i dont think its the time to be leaving out another attacking option (limited as he may be - in any sense of the word) only to bring on another midfielder and look to change our shape and tactics...etc etc
We need as many attacking options as we can get in pretty much every game and from where im sitting, scoring or not he seems to be better than what we got bar Torres when we'r going forward.
I dont know about the stats but it sure would be interesting to compare the number of goals we'v scored when having two strikers on the pitch withe numbers when we'v only playedd one... i know it worked against chelsea and to some extent against ManUtd but still...
I think we need to start playing 2 upfront more often ..
Toffeehater wrote:Keane is creating goals so whats the problem . Before nando went off injured , they were showing real signs of working together , when he comes back stick with two upfront and we will see what keane can do . He can pick out a player , seen him put in a couple of good passes , had a huge hand in both goals in the everton game , crossed in a terrific ball to kuyt in the wigan game where kirkland saved and of cos against spurs with a great turn and let it go for kuyt to finish off .
As for scoring , keane has not had many chances while playing upfront on his own , 1 against 4 is always going to be difficult . Give it 5 more games and he will come good .
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 129 guests