No smoke? - Without the media

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby The Bench » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:56 pm

http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,8652_2879141,00.html

Interesting reading. We know that they're business men, but never saw us as a way in. Probably rubbish, but could be worrying. The yanks are great at makin the right noises,  but they may not be part of Liverpool for entirely the same reasons as us.

This is not me be anti takeover, thought we've needed it for a while and am so far well pleased with they've done for us. Just thought this should be out there for discussion.

Ps Can someone make the link live. I really don't know how. cheers
User avatar
The Bench
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 1:51 am

Postby skatesy » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:00 pm

It just more third party rumour. I think it is pretty clear what is fact and fiction :)
User avatar
skatesy
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:57 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Postby Kharhaz » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:03 pm

Bill Shankly: “I was the best manager in Britain because I was never devious or cheated anyone. I’d break my wife’s legs if I played against her, but I’d never cheat her.”
User avatar
Kharhaz
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6380
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:18 am

Postby The Bench » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:04 pm

cheers Kharhaz
User avatar
The Bench
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 1:51 am

Postby lakes10 » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:30 pm

Its not the first time this has come out. they have the money and can spend it on who they like. it will have no effect on us.
Image
User avatar
lakes10
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12993
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Postby Lando_Griffin » Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:37 am

It's against the rules, so I wouldn't worry.
Image
Image

Rafa Benitez - An unfinished Legend.
User avatar
Lando_Griffin
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 10633
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:19 pm

Postby hello_red » Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:07 am

As Lando said there are rules in place to prevent this kind of thing happening.
User avatar
hello_red
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: West Lancs

Postby Leonmc0708 » Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:27 am

This thread, and hte comments inside are a classic example of the problems with people being led by the media.

Here is a tip - if you are looking at an article, best thing to do is ignore the title and the wording and look for the actual quotes.

Then see who the quotes are from and then make your own mind up.

NB Quotes from any of the following "our source" - "a source close to the club" or "our mole" should be disregarded immidiately. If a source cant be named, then its for a reason, and the reason is they dont exist or its a quote from an internet forum like this one.


Back to the article in question; there are two quotes:

""There is absolutely no truth whatsoever in the rumour that Mr Hicks is even considering investing in Roma football club," - this is from Roy Winnick who is Hicks' PA and press man.

And the other from the a shareholding company on Roma's official website saying the company had "been informed by a third party of the possible interest of an American businessman wanting to invest in AS Roma's capital".

The statement added: "As of yet, Italpetroli has not received, directly or indirectly, any interest nor offer from such investor, with the object of acquiring the majority package of AS Roma."

What I take from this article is that a journalist has seen the report on the Roma website, thought immidiately of Hicks, asked them and was told it was boll.ocks but published the story anyway as he fancied an early dart.
JUSTICE FOR THE 96

Image
User avatar
Leonmc0708
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8420
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:44 am
Location: SEFTON SHED


Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 134 guests