devaney » Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:18 pm wrote:The emails are a real shock !! Kinell FSG are businessmen !! Some of you really need to wake up and smell the fkg coffee !! Simply blaming FSG for our appalling run over the last 5 weeks is somewhat naive. Fans talk about spending money. The new main stand cost £150m and if we carry on like we have for the last five weeks they will struggle to fill the ground next season. As Reg says yes we could head down the route of ground or stand naming and charge somebody a fortune for the rights. But deals like that are also made a lot easier and more lucrative by what happens on the pitch. I do not believe for one moment that FSG are trying to make us look like a less attractive business proposition.
For years we have been linked with every man and his dog. The deals have not failed simply because of FSG's frugality. We have to be realistic and ask ourselves why top players select other clubs. As a club last year 56% of our revenue went on wages which hardly suggest that FSG are tight fisted. Out of the top clubs only Arsenal equalled that figure of 56%. And to put things truly in perspective United's ratio was 45%. Personally I believe that Klopp has been tasked with sorting this out which is a key reason behind the number of players that we have got rid of. I'm am the first to accept that our activity in the transfer market over the last 16 months has been incredibly disappointing but I'm not sure how we persuade players to join Liverpool that don't want to. Nobody on this forum has ever come up with a solution to this problem and I don't expect they ever will !!
devaney » Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:18 pm wrote:The emails are a real shock !! Kinell FSG are businessmen !! Some of you really need to wake up and smell the fkg coffee !! Simply blaming FSG for our appalling run over the last 5 weeks is somewhat naive. Fans talk about spending money. The new main stand cost £150m and if we carry on like we have for the last five weeks they will struggle to fill the ground next season. As Reg says yes we could head down the route of ground or stand naming and charge somebody a fortune for the rights. But deals like that are also made a lot easier and more lucrative by what happens on the pitch. I do not believe for one moment that FSG are trying to make us look like a less attractive business proposition.
For years we have been linked with every man and his dog. The deals have not failed simply because of FSG's frugality. We have to be realistic and ask ourselves why top players select other clubs. As a club last year 56% of our revenue went on wages which hardly suggest that FSG are tight fisted. Out of the top clubs only Arsenal equalled that figure of 56%. And to put things truly in perspective United's ratio was 45%. Personally I believe that Klopp has been tasked with sorting this out which is a key reason behind the number of players that we have got rid of. I'm am the first to accept that our activity in the transfer market over the last 16 months has been incredibly disappointing but I'm not sure how we persuade players to join Liverpool that don't want to. Nobody on this forum has ever come up with a solution to this problem and I don't expect they ever will !!
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.