made in UK wrote:1) So we now take it as gospel from an agent whoring his player around top clubs that Rafa wanted a striker? Couldn't you do better and try and back you're statement up from the horses mouth? We're bitter rivals with the mancs and Fergie couldn't do owt about where his player ended up. In other words, by coming out and saying 'Rafa wants Tevez' his agent was putting the pressure on Man. U to stop this from happening i.e give more money for Tevez. By saying LFC wanted him his agent was hoping to get a better deal for Tevez. There was know evidence (apart from an agent! lol) to show Rafa wanted a striker. I don't remember Rafa saying he did. It was the case of a typical agent playing 'the typical game', not much can be said apart from the fact Tevez ended up at Man.C, where the money was.
2) So it is the doctors fault! And Rafa's gamble didn't pay off correct!
Bringing Barry into the conversation highlights another bad error in regards to Alonso leaving. You're digging a deeper hole for yourself.
3) .
4) Okay the fact the squad was flying around Europe and Asia along with the worrying performances (not results) concludes that it was good preperation for our season ahead. Oh okay! Because we didn't look well equipped for it down at White Hart lane on the first day of the season.
5) You can safely say that. So if our injury record hasn't been as bad as Arsenal's AND we've spent more money than them and haven't won anything for three seasons AND our squad is paper thin with quality, what does that indicate?
6) ...
1) No, not gospel, but certainly suggestive. I don't think a player of his quality required 'whoring around' the top clubs either and that wasn't anything like the tone of the interview anyway (he was a clear favourite with the bookies to sign for City by then anyway). He said that Liverpool would be interested in signing him, but that Tevez would find it difficult moving essentially because of the nature of the rivalry. In other words, we were in for him, but he sort of brushed it off it as a non-starter. A slim possibility if you like. The main evidence is in the simple fact that we lacked attacking cover. You're not seriously going to argue that if he had £20m at his disposal, he wouldn't have gone and signed a midfielder or attacker, are you? If you are, may as well kill the debate there because I think it flies in the face of common sense (besides, do you really expect him to announce his intentions in the market every time, particularly if money is no guarantee?

2) On the first point, I refer you to my previous answer. On the second point, no, missing out on Barry was misfortunate given City's entry into the big spending league. He was a ready-made replacement, not many of them were about.
Incidentally, I remember how you used to argue how most 'true fans' knew who the better player was out of Masch and Alonso - that the Spaniard was overrated and that the Argentine was world class

4) You pleb. I refer you to my previous answer.
5) That Arsenal are better at keeping their trophyless spell going for longer and on a lesser budget.