Liverpool FC Forum

s@int wrote:I don't see how Berbatov has been WORSE than Keane. They have both scored 7 goals, while Berbatov has made more assists, while not missing the type of chances Keane has. Yes they are both under pressure to produce more, which is only to be expected when you pay stupid amounts of money for players who then struggle.

Sadly the fact that Berbatov or even Jo at Man city have proved to be unsuccessful hardly makes Keane value for money up to now.  Better to wait to the end of the season and see who has the goals and the medals before we decide who are the flops and who are the tops.

The one thing it does show ...... how fkn great is Torres 

I think if you look at the amount of starts berbatov has had as opposed to Keane, you may find why people think he has had a worse start. If this isn't the case and my futile attempts to protect Keane have failed i apologise in advance 

Thewaykokid wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't see how Berbatov has been WORSE than Keane. They have both scored 7 goals, while Berbatov has made more assists, while not missing the type of chances Keane has. Yes they are both under pressure to produce more, which is only to be expected when you pay stupid amounts of money for players who then struggle.

Sadly the fact that Berbatov or even Jo at Man city have proved to be unsuccessful hardly makes Keane value for money up to now.  Better to wait to the end of the season and see who has the goals and the medals before we decide who are the flops and who are the tops.

The one thing it does show ...... how fkn great is Torres 

I think if you look at the amount of starts berbatov has had as opposed to Keane, you may find why people think he has had a worse start. If this isn't the case and my futile attempts to protect Keane have failed i apologise in advance 

s@int wrote:

Thewaykokid wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't see how Berbatov has been WORSE than Keane. They have both scored 7 goals, while Berbatov has made more assists, while not missing the type of chances Keane has. Yes they are both under pressure to produce more, which is only to be expected when you pay stupid amounts of money for players who then struggle.

Sadly the fact that Berbatov or even Jo at Man city have proved to be unsuccessful hardly makes Keane value for money up to now.  Better to wait to the end of the season and see who has the goals and the medals before we decide who are the flops and who are the tops.

The one thing it does show ...... how fkn great is Torres 

I think if you look at the amount of starts berbatov has had as opposed to Keane, you may find why people think he has had a worse start. If this isn't the case and my futile attempts to protect Keane have failed i apologise in advance 

Berbatov 20 apps, Keane 26 apps , so I would imagine that with the number of times Keane has been subbed they have played for about the same amount of time?

yeh well.....................

Thewaykokid wrote:

s@int wrote:

Thewaykokid wrote:

s@int wrote:I don't see how Berbatov has been WORSE than Keane. They have both scored 7 goals, while Berbatov has made more assists, while not missing the type of chances Keane has. Yes they are both under pressure to produce more, which is only to be expected when you pay stupid amounts of money for players who then struggle.

Sadly the fact that Berbatov or even Jo at Man city have proved to be unsuccessful hardly makes Keane value for money up to now.  Better to wait to the end of the season and see who has the goals and the medals before we decide who are the flops and who are the tops.

The one thing it does show ...... how fkn great is Torres 

I think if you look at the amount of starts berbatov has had as opposed to Keane, you may find why people think he has had a worse start. If this isn't the case and my futile attempts to protect Keane have failed i apologise in advance 

Berbatov 20 apps, Keane 26 apps , so I would imagine that with the number of times Keane has been subbed they have played for about the same amount of time?

yeh well.....................

What a strange apology 

Toffeehater wrote: , bob's right , this place has been a little weird as of late .

As for keane , i don't understand rafa's logic , the striker scores and you drop him . He's in good form now and we should be playing with 2 upfront now that torres is back at get that partnership building again

Number 9 wrote:

s@int wrote:

neil wrote:go support bolton or wigan, where you live.

I don't live in Wigan or Bolton ......never have and never will. Is that really the best you can come up with ? 

Did you not know that only scousers are allowed to support Liverpool?
Go support Leigh RMI!! (if thats where you live)

Did neil get banned for that and telling Bob to find a new forum??

fivecups wrote:

Number 9 wrote:

s@int wrote:

neil wrote:go support bolton or wigan, where you live.

I don't live in Wigan or Bolton ......never have and never will. Is that really the best you can come up with ? 

Did you not know that only scousers are allowed to support Liverpool?
Go support Leigh RMI!! (if thats where you live)

Did neil get banned for that and telling Bob to find a new forum??

Can't see how those comments merit a ban?

Maybe Bob will fill us in?

Judge wrote:can only see an emoticon bob? (thats what he posted anyway)

Lando_Griffin wrote:Why the clamor to play 2 up top when we've got ourselves in pole position without it?

Toffeehater wrote:

Lando_Griffin wrote:Why the clamor to play 2 up top when we've got ourselves in pole position without it?

I've never been a big fan of one up front as i feel the striker gets isolated and is up against 4 defenders . We've got two top strikers in the squad and should be looking to play both whenever we can . Keane playing behind torres as a 2nd striker where he has always been more effective and successful