Liverpool FC Forum

by **LegBarnes** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:29 pm

SupitsJonF wrote:
Santa wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Santa wrote:
Rorschach26 wrote:yeh a draw away 2 Arsenal

what a terrible result eh?!?

wtf are you babbling about? sure on the surfae a draw against Arsenal away might not be that bad a result but considering the circumstances the least we could do was to show our attacking intent instead we drop our pace, misplace more passes and generally run around doing feck all and not tested their keeper despite having one extra man. Rafa's negativity is starting to get on my nerve tbh

Aye, those three strikers he brought on were negative tactics alright.

you're having a laugh aren't you...taking off your winger who had a decent game and replace him with another winger who can't even control a ball let alone get pass one defender was brilliant tactical move...taking off you goal scorer and put your right a man who played on he right must be progressive then...and put in a striker with 2 mins left shows you really wanted to win the game...then Sherlock for your deep knowledge and insight to the game!

Babel has bossed Arsenal before. I didn't think he would have a repeat performance but I didn't know he would be completely useless.

that last goal he scored last time he ran throught middle I would have liked to see him up middle this game but no rafa still thinks he is winger it was funny now its painful.

by **Not Too Xabi** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:29 pm

SupitsJonF wrote:Babel has bossed Arsenal before. I didn't think he would have a repeat performance but I didn't know he would be completely useless.

I thought it was his worst performance for us - and that's saying something. Simply woeful.

by **Petar** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:30 pm

Santa wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
Santa wrote:
Rorschach26 wrote:yeh a draw away 2 Arsenal

what a terrible result eh?!?

wtf are you babbling about? sure on the surfae a draw against Arsenal away might not be that bad a result but considering the circumstances the least we could do was to show our attacking intent instead we drop our pace, misplace more passes and generally run around doing feck all and not tested their keeper despite having one extra man. Rafa's negativity is starting to get on my nerve tbh

Aye, those three strikers he brought on were negative tactics alright.

you're having a laugh aren't you...taking off your winger who had a decent game and replace him with another winger who can't even control a ball let alone get pass one defender was brilliant tactical move...taking off you goal scorer and put your right a man who played on he right must be progressive then...and put in a striker with 2 mins left shows you really wanted to win the game...then Sherlock for your deep knowledge and insight to the game!

mate, I never met man who talks more :censored:

. He is always capable of telling that black thing is rose in fact,hahaha

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:30 pm

LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.

Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

you wouldn't know football if gerrard kicked one up your ar.se.

If you don't like good football go suport WBA.

In fact they play nicer football then us atm.

Just stop posting. You should know to call it a day when you're talking balls.

At the end of the day, nobody says how attractive the loser's football was. Football is a direct decedent of the Roman gladiator sport. Winner takes it all. Didn't matter if you looked good during the fight if you are dead at the end of it. Football - ditto!

Roman gladiator sport

WTF you on.

Is it not? Same mentality, only no one dies. Go look it up. It was the Romans that invented the spectator sport.

Arena - fans - two parties - the game

by **RedBen** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:31 pm

by **Greavesie** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:31 pm

Why the hell is everyone bashing the team, we're top of the league by two points with Chelsea to play at Woodison tomorrow. We have a great tie with Real next year. We've lost only once this season and we're only half way through. Get behind the lads. Fair enough we didn't win but this is Arsenal in their own backyard

by **Bermenstein** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:31 pm

jedwards wrote:A very negative tactics once again!!!!, Benitez might not was at the match in person, but he was on mobile phone sending his negative tactics to his coaching staffs and players a likes, very disappointing.

Another two points drops, which it eventually will hunt the clever Benitez way before next may!!!

I do not see what is the point to give this lousy manager new contract, the useless owners should wait to see if he achieve the main trophy by wining the league!!!!!!, which I very much doubt.

Two wasteful point once again.

Arsenal are a team, who like us, have beaten both Chelsea & Man Utd. So this was always gonna be a very evenly matched occasion. And to take something from this game was of paramount importance.

The stats dont say Lpool were negative, and after watching the game, we definitly had chances to score through Gerrard, Kuyt & El Zhar late on.

Whats the point in playing Champagne Football, Like Man City, and being in the relegation zone.

IMO, 1 point is better than none.

by **Santa** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:31 pm

Petar wrote:
Madmax wrote:
metalhead wrote:Lucas?!?!?!?!?!?

dont worry he will perform.

hahahaha,how people knows fukc all about footie,I just don`t know

Rafa wanted to keep him on the field just to see if he'll eventually get a card...point proven Rafa was right as always

by **akumaface** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:32 pm

Petar wrote:
Madmax wrote:
metalhead wrote:Lucas?!?!?!?!?!?

dont worry he will perform.

hahahaha,how people knows fukc all about footie,I just don`t know

Totally Agree

Lucas got to go. It made me sad just to hear his name....He is so consistent as his ratio of good game to bad game is always like 1:9.5. Really too bad can't bet on it as I would be rich by now if I bet on him to be bad in every game he had played..

by **LegBarnes** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:32 pm

Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.

Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

you wouldn't know football if gerrard kicked one up your ar.se.

If you don't like good football go suport WBA.

In fact they play nicer football then us atm.

Just stop posting. You should know to call it a day when you're talking balls.

At the end of the day, nobody says how attractive the loser's football was. Football is a direct decedent of the Roman gladiator sport. Winner takes it all. Didn't matter if you looked good during the fight if you are dead at the end of it. Football - ditto!

Roman gladiator sport

WTF you on.

Is it not? Same mentality, only no one dies. Go look it up. It was the Romans that invented the spectator sport.

Arena - fans - two parties - the game

Right ok.

Football is football I don't care its about skill as much as passion and I seen niether today apart from keanes goal.

Rest of game we was dire.

by **maypaxvobiscum** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:32 pm

we didnt SEEM go for the win hey im not pleased too but we got a point at least from a top top team.

thats so much better then drawing teams like stoke or west ham.

if it wasnt a top 4 team i could understand the complains but its a team that has beaten the team we'll be facing in Feb.

some of you posters whining about wanting good football need a reality check.

and oh we were away too. the crowd was really on a high and cheering the gunners on of course our players would be guarded and conservative.

its better then losing anyway. some people here....idiots. and which moron said we dont go for the kill?

remember when we were 2-0 down at man city we came back. we had loads of fightbacks. we went for it.

so dont sit behind your pc and slate the players for not playing well today against the team whose balls you'ld be licking cause they have such pacey, quick, skillful players who are hard to beat.

hypocrites.

by **Alex G.** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:36 pm

I´m starting to be tired of babel, sell him.

by **Petar** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:36 pm

LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:
Emerald Red wrote:
LegBarnes wrote:Whats point of winning league with sh.it football you no better then chavski then.

Just be a token win.

That's just a really daft thing to come off with.

Not really I watch football and pay my money to watch good football not to have dick swinging contest about who won a cup ?

ffs football really has pi.ss poor fans nowa days more into shiny cups then the wonderful game.
Again, what a daft thing to come out with.

you wouldn't know football if gerrard kicked one up your ar.se.

If you don't like good football go suport WBA.

In fact they play nicer football then us atm.

Just stop posting. You should know to call it a day when you're talking

At the end of the day, nobody says how attractive the loser's football was. Football is a direct decedent of the Roman gladiator sport. Winner takes it all. Didn't matter if you looked good during the fight if you are dead at the end of it. Football - ditto!

Roman gladiator sport

WTF you on.

Is it not? Same mentality, only no one dies. Go look it up. It was the Romans that invented the spectator sport.

Arena - fans - two parties - the game

Right ok.

Football is football I don't care its about skill as much as passion and I seen niether today apart from keanes goal.

Rest of game we was dire.

how can someone have so much confidence to even argue with the man who is saying that football is pretty much about skills and vision(beautiful game). EMERALD RED,you know fukc all about football,you proved it this time forever. Hahahahaha,gladiators... And I wanted to prove him that we are team without skillfull players... What a joke,hahahaha. I think I will never talk to someone again about football when he thinks about gladiators

by **SupitsJonF** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:37 pm

Alex G. wrote:I´m starting to feel tired of babel, sell him.

Didnt real want him for around 14-18mil? Even if he does turn out to be good, its still a great price.

by **Emerald Red** » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:38 pm

Football is football I don't care its about skill as much as passion and I seen niether today apart from keanes goal.

Rest of game we was dire.

Every f*cking game people expect us to batter teams no matter who they are. In reality, this can never happen. Credit is never given to the opposition. We are always dire. We are always so terrible, and Benitez is always so negative. So negative in fact we're top of the league. I've seen the team have a spine about them this season where we actually have fought our way out of the mire. How the f*ck anyone can condemn the team that they claim to support in the way they do for this is beyond me. I've an idea: let's bring back Houllier and have us pitch a tent outside our own box. Or why not call out Evans and have us play nice attacking football where defending is an afterthought? Or better still, let's bring back Souness. I hear he's up for a job. Some of you moans forget.

Liverpool FC Forum

ARSENAL VS LIVERPOOL - Sun 21/12/08 4pm

Who is online