Scottbot wrote:Owzat wrote:Voronin may not be ideal, but he did score four in his first 10 games for Liverpool and two in his last five. He's far from as bad as most on here like to knock him for being and he wouldn't cost a penny.
How many times have you pulled people (myself included) up for being selective with stats in this way ? And then you do it yourself?
How am I being selective? I pointed out he had his moments, not that he was fantastic. It's not as if I was even comparing him with anybody, just observing that he can score goals and yet the way some people talk you'd think he never did in a Liverpool shirt.
But then anyone can claim there is comparison between the two or more instances you are referring to with little proof there is any. I've never said Voronin was a great striker, however he cost nothing and was dumped just like that.
STRAIGHT COMPARISON
Keane - 4 goals in 21 appearances (0.190 goals/app) 63 mins per appearance
Voronin 6 goals in 28 appearances (0.214 goals/app) 57 mins per appearance
The reason I pick some people up on their stats is often because they are selective to try and make someone look better than they are. The last example being someone saying "Crouch made appearances as sub" Well so do other strikers, if you are going to adjust Crouch's stats then do likewise for other strikers. You're just bleating and stamping your feet because I've picked two spells where Voronin scored goals, even though I've done that to show he had his moments. EVEN TORRES has not played every minute of every game, he's made 61 appearances and nearly 1/5 of those were less than 60 minutes.
Jaysus, to some small minded people on here stats are knocked and accusations fly that they can be used to show anything. To other small minded people on here they are largely political because people don't like what other people's stats show. You've taken my stats completely out of context with the comments I made and used it for your own political device. Get over yourself