January clearout - Should we or shouldn't we?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Owzat » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:39 am

Scottbot wrote:
Owzat wrote:Voronin may not be ideal, but he did score four in his first 10 games for Liverpool and two in his last five. He's far from as bad as most on here like to knock him for being and he wouldn't cost a penny.

How many times have you pulled people (myself included) up for being selective with stats in this way ? And then you do it yourself?

How am I being selective? I pointed out he had his moments, not that he was fantastic. It's not as if I was even comparing him with anybody, just observing that he can score goals and yet the way some people talk you'd think he never did in a Liverpool shirt.

But then anyone can claim there is comparison between the two or more instances you are referring to with little proof there is any. I've never said Voronin was a great striker, however he cost nothing and was dumped just like that.

STRAIGHT COMPARISON

Keane - 4 goals in 21 appearances (0.190 goals/app) 63 mins per appearance

Voronin 6 goals in 28 appearances (0.214 goals/app) 57 mins per appearance


The reason I pick some people up on their stats is often because they are selective to try and make someone look better than they are. The last example being someone saying "Crouch made appearances as sub" Well so do other strikers, if you are going to adjust Crouch's stats then do likewise for other strikers. You're just bleating and stamping your feet because I've picked two spells where Voronin scored goals, even though I've done that to show he had his moments. EVEN TORRES has not played every minute of every game, he's made 61 appearances and nearly 1/5 of those were less than 60 minutes.

Jaysus, to some small minded people on here stats are knocked and accusations fly that they can be used to show anything. To other small minded people on here they are largely political because people don't like what other people's stats show. You've taken my stats completely out of context with the comments I made and used it for your own political device. Get over yourself
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby Owzat » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:51 am

The_Rock wrote:Ok here goes........

1)Babel
2)Lucas
3)Dossena

Have to get rid of these 3 players.... They don't have the minimum technique to play at this level.

I rather give pennant a game instead of babel. Pennant at least has a decent 1st touch....he doesn't lose the ball as much.

As for lucas.....if he is not sold soonest.....beneitz will drop either alonso or mashcherano for more games as an excuse to give lucas a game...

Agree to some extent about Pennant over Babel, square pegs and round holes etc.

But how much do you anticipate getting for those three players? I'd suggest we'd be looking at a loss on the £23.5m+ we spent on them.

DanAn - the 'standard jibe' about people spending too much time on FM or words to that effect, is because a lot of people talk about selling players and buying players like it's simple and without being remotely realistic. You have to find a buyer, the truth being those that could pay near what we did would not want them and those that would want them would pay a lot less than we paid.

Example

We paid £10m for Diouf. On FM/CM/Whatever you might sell him for £12m+ or maybe at a loss at £7.5m. There'd be a few bidders and you could find a real bargain to buy with the funds. In reality we don't know how little we got for him, the fact that Slumberland just paid £2.5m for him shows how much his fee decreased pretty rapidly. I'd hate to think how much he and Diouf cost us in losses.

So for Lucas we might get a bid or two of £2m, Dossena probably £3m-£4m and Babel maybe as much as £7m - unless we can find someone who rates any of them as highly as Rafa. We could get as much as £15m-£20m for them, more likely we'd get something like £10m because the clubs bidding are more likely to be teams like Bolton, Fulham, Stoke, Sunderland, Wigan and not the likes of Man Utd, Milan, Roma, Real Madrid. Babel is the most saleable of the three, even then he's done little since arriving to maintain a high fee based on potential.

So the reason for said "standard jibe" is that people list names to sell and talk of signing more players with the money as if it is easy.
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby aCe' » Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:34 pm

Not the most credible of sources but very interesting nonetheless..
Elano for Benny would be a great deal but really cant see ManCity with all the money they have going for Benny... They already have better players down the flanks and in th middle so really dont know why theyd even be interested...Elano on the other hand seems a top player... creative and can make things happen... and can play in many different positions... plenty of OPTIONS.... would probably mean that we can afford to get rid of Benny, Lucas and maybe even Pennant and still have good backup for every position (4-4-2)...
anyways..




Liverpool To Swap Benayoun For Elano?
The latest reports from England suggest that Manchester City's unsettled midfielder Elano could be headed for Liverpool in January, with Yossi Benayoun going the other way...
According to the News of the World, the Reds are willing to offer Benayoun plus young right-back Stephen Darby to lure Elano to Anfield.

The City playmaker's future has been under cloud ever since he lashed out at manager Mark Hughes' selection policy, an outburst which earned him a £40,000 fine.

After being an integral part of Sven-Goran Eriksson's side, the 27-year-old has spent more time on the sidelines this term following the arrivals of Robinho and Shaun Wright-Phillips. The rise of Stephen Ireland has hardly helped either.

Meanwhile, on Merseyside, Benayoun has become similarly frustrated with his lack of first-team opportunities, so much so that he publicly threatened to leave Liverpool should his situation not improve over the coming weeks.

But with new signing Albert Riera in fine form on the left and a revitalised Dirk Kuyt cementing a spot on the right, the Israeli midfielder's prospects under Rafael Benitez appear slim.

Both players only arrived at their respective clubs last year: Elano from Shakhtar Donetsk, Benayoun from West Ham United.

http://www.goal.com/en....r-elano
User avatar
aCe'
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6218
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:47 pm
Location: ...

Postby Scottbot » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:18 pm

Owzat wrote:
Scottbot wrote:
Owzat wrote:Voronin may not be ideal, but he did score four in his first 10 games for Liverpool and two in his last five. He's far from as bad as most on here like to knock him for being and he wouldn't cost a penny.

How many times have you pulled people (myself included) up for being selective with stats in this way ? And then you do it yourself?

How am I being selective? I pointed out he had his moments, not that he was fantastic. It's not as if I was even comparing him with anybody, just observing that he can score goals and yet the way some people talk you'd think he never did in a Liverpool shirt.

But then anyone can claim there is comparison between the two or more instances you are referring to with little proof there is any. I've never said Voronin was a great striker, however he cost nothing and was dumped just like that.

STRAIGHT COMPARISON

Keane - 4 goals in 21 appearances (0.190 goals/app) 63 mins per appearance

Voronin 6 goals in 28 appearances (0.214 goals/app) 57 mins per appearance


The reason I pick some people up on their stats is often because they are selective to try and make someone look better than they are. The last example being someone saying "Crouch made appearances as sub" Well so do other strikers, if you are going to adjust Crouch's stats then do likewise for other strikers. You're just bleating and stamping your feet because I've picked two spells where Voronin scored goals, even though I've done that to show he had his moments. EVEN TORRES has not played every minute of every game, he's made 61 appearances and nearly 1/5 of those were less than 60 minutes.

Jaysus, to some small minded people on here stats are knocked and accusations fly that they can be used to show anything. To other small minded people on here they are largely political because people don't like what other people's stats show. You've taken my stats completely out of context with the comments I made and used it for your own political device. Get over yourself

Rubbish, I was simply pointing out that you have (in the past) pulled up people for using stats over a shorter number of games ie. to demonstrate recent form. For example if I said Robbie Keane has scored 4 goals in his last 10 games (it might be 11 now i'm not sure) and that isn't such a bad strike rate, is it? I've no doubt you would choose to highlight that the player has scored just 4 in 21, preferring to look at the player's overall contribution rather than his recent form BECAUSE you do not rate the player. I'm sure if you liked him you would be saying "4 in 10(11), the boy is playing better than his first 10 games at the club etc etc".You say others are selective with the way they present statistics but let's not pretend that you are not guilty of the same thing on occasions.
Last edited by Scottbot on Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Scottbot
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Winchester, Hampshire

Postby ruskiy playmaker » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:42 pm

If I were Rafa, I'd definitely send Lucas or Plessis out on loan.  Maybe to Arsenal?
[img]http://i42.tinypic.com/lkw42.gif[img]
User avatar
ruskiy playmaker
 
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: USA

Postby LFC Uber Elite Super Member » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:37 pm

aCe' wrote:Not the most credible of sources but very interesting nonetheless..
Elano for Benny would be a great deal but really cant see ManCity with all the money they have going for Benny... They already have better players down the flanks and in th middle so really dont know why theyd even be interested...Elano on the other hand seems a top player... creative and can make things happen... and can play in many different positions... plenty of OPTIONS.... would probably mean that we can afford to get rid of Benny, Lucas and maybe even Pennant and still have good backup for every position (4-4-2)...
anyways..




Liverpool To Swap Benayoun For Elano?
The latest reports from England suggest that Manchester City's unsettled midfielder Elano could be headed for Liverpool in January, with Yossi Benayoun going the other way...
According to the News of the World, the Reds are willing to offer Benayoun plus young right-back Stephen Darby to lure Elano to Anfield.

The City playmaker's future has been under cloud ever since he lashed out at manager Mark Hughes' selection policy, an outburst which earned him a £40,000 fine.

After being an integral part of Sven-Goran Eriksson's side, the 27-year-old has spent more time on the sidelines this term following the arrivals of Robinho and Shaun Wright-Phillips. The rise of Stephen Ireland has hardly helped either.

Meanwhile, on Merseyside, Benayoun has become similarly frustrated with his lack of first-team opportunities, so much so that he publicly threatened to leave Liverpool should his situation not improve over the coming weeks.

But with new signing Albert Riera in fine form on the left and a revitalised Dirk Kuyt cementing a spot on the right, the Israeli midfielder's prospects under Rafael Benitez appear slim.

Both players only arrived at their respective clubs last year: Elano from Shakhtar Donetsk, Benayoun from West Ham United.

http://www.goal.com/en....r-elano

If true? Would be great business IMO, Elano is a cracking player who can play across the midfield including the right wing,Would be a dumb move for city, not sure Benayoun would see a whole lot more of first team action at city and if they put a for sale sign on elano they would get some big offers.
LFC Uber Elite Super Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:22 am
Location: Bonny Hills

Postby The_Rock » Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:57 am

Owzat wrote:
The_Rock wrote:Ok here goes........

1)Babel
2)Lucas
3)Dossena

Have to get rid of these 3 players.... They don't have the minimum technique to play at this level.

I rather give pennant a game instead of babel. Pennant at least has a decent 1st touch....he doesn't lose the ball as much.

As for lucas.....if he is not sold soonest.....beneitz will drop either alonso or mashcherano for more games as an excuse to give lucas a game...

Agree to some extent about Pennant over Babel, square pegs and round holes etc.

But how much do you anticipate getting for those three players? I'd suggest we'd be looking at a loss on the £23.5m+ we spent on them.

DanAn - the 'standard jibe' about people spending too much time on FM or words to that effect, is because a lot of people talk about selling players and buying players like it's simple and without being remotely realistic. You have to find a buyer, the truth being those that could pay near what we did would not want them and those that would want them would pay a lot less than we paid.

Example

We paid £10m for Diouf. On FM/CM/Whatever you might sell him for £12m+ or maybe at a loss at £7.5m. There'd be a few bidders and you could find a real bargain to buy with the funds. In reality we don't know how little we got for him, the fact that Slumberland just paid £2.5m for him shows how much his fee decreased pretty rapidly. I'd hate to think how much he and Diouf cost us in losses.

So for Lucas we might get a bid or two of £2m, Dossena probably £3m-£4m and Babel maybe as much as £7m - unless we can find someone who rates any of them as highly as Rafa. We could get as much as £15m-£20m for them, more likely we'd get something like £10m because the clubs bidding are more likely to be teams like Bolton, Fulham, Stoke, Sunderland, Wigan and not the likes of Man Utd, Milan, Roma, Real Madrid. Babel is the most saleable of the three, even then he's done little since arriving to maintain a high fee based on potential.

So the reason for said "standard jibe" is that people list names to sell and talk of signing more players with the money as if it is easy.

The question is how much are we willing to lose on these players....

I think its pretty obvious that we are not gonna get back what we paid for these players (let alone profit on them)...

So the best to hope for is damage limitation (like what beneitz did against fulham last year...... :p ..kekekkeke)

Dossena (7 million) - i reckon we can at least get back 6 million if we get rid of him in january (2009). We won't miss him at all. I reckon Insua is much better than him anyway and will make an able stand-in for auerlio.  Dossena is still regarded as one of the best fullbacks in their league (if u believe what his agent says)...and he can blame his poor performance on not settling down in "cold cold" england. A mid table italian team will take him back.

Babel (11 million) - He is 1st choice for the dutch national team (which i find baffling...... for someone who can't even trap the ball.....who can't even put in a simple cross from his left foot....who can't even head the ball...). We should make use of this and get rid of him soonest. Babel still has a good impression on opposition fans (grass is greener on the other side syndrome). People who haven't seen him play most of the times (or those who only see the match highlights) still think he is the next henry....still think he has massive potential. In fact, if we play our cards right, we could make a tidy profit on him (but we don't have a competant CEO/spin doctor to market babel)....so i say any bidder willing to come up with 10 million...take it.

Lucas (8 million is it ?) - This is the hardest....... Almost every commentator does not have good things to say about lucas. Almost all my mates don't know why beneitz bought him (the rest don't even know he is from brazil..... :p). Think its safe to say even the match going fans don't rate him especially if u heard their reaction whenever he misplaced a pass or "dilly-dallied" on the ball for a second too long .... I don't think we can even get anything close to what we paid for him. So in perspective of this...we should see anything in the range of 4 million as an awesome offer...... Heck Loaning him out for 1 million and selling him for 3 million also sounds like a good offer for someone who won the brazilian player of the year (or is it youth player of the year ?).

The thing is the longer we keep these players, the more we are gonna lose on their transfer value.

You mentioned Diouf. If houllier had got rid of him after a year....in all propability, we might have lost only 2 to 3 million pounds on him. But houllier kept him long enough....and no-one was willing to pay for him. Look at josemi and the right back from holland (can't remember him)....if i am not wrong, we didn't make a loss on them.


So the morale of the story...get rid of these players soonest (when the other managers don't really have a clue of their true ability)..and we won't make too much loss on them.

On other notes.....i read that man city want to exchange elano for benayoun....If beneitz can pull this off....it would be awesome. Elano will be great in the right forward/wing role that kuyt is doing..... Then Kuyt can go back to partnering Torres upfront. And Keane can do the babel role as an impact sub... Everything works out.
Last edited by The_Rock on Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
A Genius Billionaire Playboy Philanthropist
Image
User avatar
The_Rock
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:30 pm
Location: Michigan, Toronto and Singapore...take your pick

Postby GYBS » Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:40 am

Maybe the reason why Lucas and Babel dont seem to be for sale is because Rafa rates both of them and seeing as they are both 21 thinks they have the potential to offer more to the team - both have shown it in parts during last season - babel when coming on as a sub - and lucas when he filled in for xabi .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby crazyhorse » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:46 am

At the same age Fabregas looked average... Give them time.
Image
Image
Image
THIS IS ANFIELD
User avatar
crazyhorse
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2249
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 5:43 pm

Postby GYBS » Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:41 pm

umm cant compare them to fabregas mate as he was quality from the age of 19
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby GYBS » Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:46 pm

PS Babel and Lucas are both older than fabregas
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby Roger Red Hat » Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:01 pm

Im hoping to have a good clearout later today - me guts have been aching for about 12 hours now, baking up a beauty
Sex, drugs and sausage rolls!
User avatar
Roger Red Hat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Yorkshire

Postby LFC2007 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:21 pm

ruskiy playmaker wrote:If I were Rafa, I'd definitely send Lucas or Plessis out on loan.  Maybe to Arsenal?

Just what they need.  :Oo:
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Number 9 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:36 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
ruskiy playmaker wrote:If I were Rafa, I'd definitely send Lucas or Plessis out on loan.  Maybe to Arsenal?

Just what they need.  :Oo:

Send Lucas to arsenal,he could learn a bit of boxing in the dressing room at half time...cause he's never gonna be a footballer,either that or they could turn him upside down and use him to mop the floors with that fecking head of his!
He's good for fu'ck all else!not v often i feel so strongly about a player in a negative way,but he just drives me mad as does raf playing him,deep down Rafa knows he was a big mistake!
I reckon
Image
User avatar
Number 9
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7601
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: South Belfast

Postby btorres » Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:49 pm

Hi Everyone,

Hope all of you are doing well.

Well I joined up just to say that I am from another forum
http://z6.invisionfree.com/WalkOn/index.php?

Now this forum is just in its testing phase and its the new LIVERPOOL SUPPORTERS CLUB MALTA forum, they already had an old one walkonlfc.com which had many members but unfortunately the posts where always going down until no posts were ever made. So we are trying a new forum that has new looks and we want just some members to join and try it out and give the New forum some life.

I'm sorry to advertise here on this great and big forum but I had to do somewhere.

Cheers to everyone, YNWA
http://z6.invisionfree.com/WalkOn/index.php?
btorres
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Malta

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e