Carra was an example, many CB's can improve with age, France Baresi, Maldini even Tony Adams being others ?
Carra also has developed more as a leader, therefore helping him improve his game.
Bam wrote:redbeergoggles wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Of Dne wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Of Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Joe Cole - a player who used to frustrate a lot but had the raw ability to be a quality player. He's improved his decision making in his time at Chelsea and developed physically, now a top quality player.
Frank Lampard - a decent midfielder at West Ham who many thought Chelsea overpaid for at £8m. His overall game has improved and he's now arguably one of the best midfielders in the league.
Fernando Torres - Although I didn't watch him often in Spain, he's developed physically without a doubt.
Your first two points are complete and utter rubbish.
FFS, don't start down this road in yet another thread. It's a discussion. If you disagree explain why rather than just dismissing things out of hand. And you wonder why people find you condescending and belligerent.
Whats the point when idiots come back with the great old argument of "you rated Cheyrou" or "are you saying you know more than a professional" or some other rubbish like that.
There was no insult there, I stated a fact. Grow a pair of balls and allow a little bit of freedom of speech. Its pathetic how politically correct this countries becoming. Ban ban ban, censor, censor, censor. Next they'll be talking about not being able to discipline our own kids... oh wait, they already are!
This thread illustrates the sum total of your affect on this forum. On the positive side, you stimulate interesting footy discussion. Sabre's taken a point you often make and turned it into a thread that's got great potential. On the negative side, you condescend to practically everyone that disagrees with you, work hard to shut down debate rather than open it up and persist with the egotistical notion that your beliefs are fact, end of. In short, you're a Grade Ato most people on here and then you wonder why some people work so hard to poke holes in your proclamations? As for the whole censorship argument, do me a favour. My job is to ensure that we can have a civil conversation on here and you undermine that at virtually every turn. If you think everyone on here's an idiot that's your prerogative but if you persist on telling everyone so in your posts then we'll continue to have a problem. Sort out the attitude.
So degradation in the form of an insult, ie calling a member a grade A pr*ck is OK, and obviously acceptable if it comes from a moderator, Well done you have practically managed to dismantle and contravene everything you stated in the Open reminder to all members thread .....Keep pushing won't you fella . I'm expecting a card in keeping with the new regime ,but if it materializes then it would have been well worth it .
If you've only entered this topic to stir up what is a general opinion around here, then I'd suggest you take your 'beergoggles' out of this thread and go and get laid by a beautiful woman.
Bam wrote:Has Carra improved as a leader ?
Bad Bob wrote:Bam wrote:redbeergoggles wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Of Dne wrote:Bad Bob wrote:Of Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Joe Cole - a player who used to frustrate a lot but had the raw ability to be a quality player. He's improved his decision making in his time at Chelsea and developed physically, now a top quality player.
Frank Lampard - a decent midfielder at West Ham who many thought Chelsea overpaid for at £8m. His overall game has improved and he's now arguably one of the best midfielders in the league.
Fernando Torres - Although I didn't watch him often in Spain, he's developed physically without a doubt.
Your first two points are complete and utter rubbish.
FFS, don't start down this road in yet another thread. It's a discussion. If you disagree explain why rather than just dismissing things out of hand. And you wonder why people find you condescending and belligerent.
Whats the point when idiots come back with the great old argument of "you rated Cheyrou" or "are you saying you know more than a professional" or some other rubbish like that.
There was no insult there, I stated a fact. Grow a pair of balls and allow a little bit of freedom of speech. Its pathetic how politically correct this countries becoming. Ban ban ban, censor, censor, censor. Next they'll be talking about not being able to discipline our own kids... oh wait, they already are!
This thread illustrates the sum total of your affect on this forum. On the positive side, you stimulate interesting footy discussion. Sabre's taken a point you often make and turned it into a thread that's got great potential. On the negative side, you condescend to practically everyone that disagrees with you, work hard to shut down debate rather than open it up and persist with the egotistical notion that your beliefs are fact, end of. In short, you're a Grade Ato most people on here and then you wonder why some people work so hard to poke holes in your proclamations? As for the whole censorship argument, do me a favour. My job is to ensure that we can have a civil conversation on here and you undermine that at virtually every turn. If you think everyone on here's an idiot that's your prerogative but if you persist on telling everyone so in your posts then we'll continue to have a problem. Sort out the attitude.
So degradation in the form of an insult, ie calling a member a grade A pr*ck is OK, and obviously acceptable if it comes from a moderator, Well done you have practically managed to dismantle and contravene everything you stated in the Open reminder to all members thread .....Keep pushing won't you fella . I'm expecting a card in keeping with the new regime ,but if it materializes then it would have been well worth it .
If you've only entered this topic to stir up what is a general opinion around here, then I'd suggest you take your 'beergoggles' out of this thread and go and get laid by a beautiful woman.
Let's keep focused here because this is fast becoming a top thread. Stu's responded in the right way to my post by focusing on chatting footy rather than shouting down others. Long may that continue. As for redbeergoggles, he can PM me if he's got a beef. I detect a strong whiff of sour grapes even though his card was rescinded ages ago but you can't please everyone.
Back to the discussion and I wonder about the notion of a player "finding their level." Has Glen Johnson improved as a RB since his days at Chelsea or was he simply out of his depth there and is better suited to a side like Portsmouth? What about SWP at Chelsea vs at Man City?
Fo Dne wrote:Glenn Johnson's a good player. He's very good infact. When young players move clubs and are surrounded by superstars, especially when they don't know them it can be intimidating and they can struggle with confidence. Which, you guessed it, affects performance.
Glenn Johnson would get into most sides in the league and I'd have him at Liverpool in a shot.
Bad Bob wrote:Fo Dne wrote:Glenn Johnson's a good player. He's very good infact. When young players move clubs and are surrounded by superstars, especially when they don't know them it can be intimidating and they can struggle with confidence. Which, you guessed it, affects performance.
Glenn Johnson would get into most sides in the league and I'd have him at Liverpool in a shot.
Okay, so you're of the opinion that Johnson always had the ability but was just a bit overwhelmed at Chelsea. Where does concentration and maturity factor into the equation. Johnson used to be the type of player that switched off every so often at inopportune moments (not unlike his current teammate, David James). Has he sorted that out now or is he still prone to it? And what does that tell us about a player's ability to improve? Is concentration an "attribute" that can be improved?
Players attributes don't improve with age. Players don't even become something they aren't. They can learn systems, learn how to play in a particular system, become well drilled and become more confident and get to know their team mates better but they do not improve attributes. Occassionally they will physically develop late, but thats about as far it goes.
Players who spend hours trying to improve and are really determined to improve would improve.
It will never happen, it has never happened.
Fo Dne wrote:Yooj Bigullz wrote:I agree largely with that, Fo Dne. For the record, I dont think Lampard is special by any stretch. The system and personnel help a lot, no doubt. I was just making the point I think he improved over time, little things which he could improve, and that has made him a good player instead of staying an average player
Well I disagree because I think he's always been good, no more, no less.
Fo Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Fo Dne wrote:LFC2007 wrote:Joe Cole - a player who used to frustrate a lot but had the raw ability to be a quality player. He's improved his decision making in his time at Chelsea and developed physically, now a top quality player.
Frank Lampard - a decent midfielder at West Ham who many thought Chelsea overpaid for at £8m. His overall game has improved and he's now arguably one of the best midfielders in the league.
Fernando Torres - Although I didn't watch him often in Spain, he's developed physically without a doubt.
Your first two points are complete and utter rubbish.
Right, and I should trust your judgement. Boumsong, Cheyrou, Cisse,Prutton etc..
But you trust Benitez'? Lucas, Josemi, Nunez, Gonzalez, Kromkamp etc?
Rush Job wrote:And as for Lucas, its not just Rafa that rates him, has he not been in a senior Brazil squad?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests