Leonmc0708 wrote:s@int wrote:Insanity - Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
these smilies would have been more appropriate:
![]()
![]()
![]()
I take it you don't agree with my definition then Leon?
Leonmc0708 wrote:s@int wrote:Insanity - Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
these smilies would have been more appropriate:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Leonmc0708 wrote:No one said dont have an opinion, after all htey are like ar.se holes - every one has one.
The point is the professing to know better than a man who has won what he has in football from the comfort of your armchair with the benefit of hindsight is laughable to say the least.
Apologies for having a sense of humour (although its level and effectiveness is debateable) and posting pictures to lighten the mood, I shall and try and be someone that I am not when on line and refrain from pi.ss taking, jibes, jokes and all forms of humour hence forth.
Criticism of the manager is fine, pointing out where you beleive it went wrong is fine, suggesting possible solutions is fine, however talking of the guy in a derogatory way, professing to know 100% for sure where it went wrong and making out like "this substitution and that tactic" (with the benefit of hindsight) would have meant a win is quite frankly laughable.
As for the real fan, define this for me will you Michael ?
Abject failure is interesting also. I do not beleive we where relegated in the last four seasons any more then I think we have any right to win the league, unlike others clearly do.
For the recorddictionary wrote:abject (ab-ject)
adjective
1. utterly hopeless, miserable, humiliating, or wretched: abject poverty.
2. contemptible; despicable; base-spirited: an abject coward.
3. shamelessly servile; slavish.
4. Obsolete. cast aside.
Final thing to consider, we do not have seperate teams for the league, europe, fa cup and league cup, thus you cant seperate the four when talking of team success or of failure.
s@int wrote:spot on Bigmick ...... I know its early but I think you are right mate.
stmichael wrote:Also, this notion that Torres got over rotated last season by certain "pundits" did my f#cking head in. He was rested for two games in the whole season when he was fully fit, against Birmingham and Portsmouth. That may have cost us a couple of points in hindsight, but what was more to blame was some completely daft defending in games, especially at home.
Sabre wrote:Just a question:
What are the signs that indicate that Rafa's seen the light?
I started to read this phrase when Rafa started to use more often the one striker system, and we were out of Europe with less games. But I do think it's the form of players and amount of games the one who dictates which system we use. I feel that if he had a Villa he'd use 2 strikers or 1 at will and depending of the game.
So I'm interested to know what signs do you see to suggest that Rafa might have seen the light, or part of it.
P.S. By the way I'm a computer scientist and a frustrated footballer.
Bad Bob wrote:Well, as ever, I think it will depend on how we define things. For instance, I don't think Rafa will be resting Torres over-much this season. He didn't really do it last season either apart from the much talked about Portsmouth and Birmingham City games but I doubt you'll see that approach repeated. In fact, I think that--perhaps fullbacks aside--Rafa will have a much better idea of his best side this campaign than last, which should bring with it more selection continuity.
I do, however, expect that he'll rotate between the competitions fairly liberally. That is, he'll make several changes to the team that played a league match on the weekend when it comes time to play a mid-week cup match. I expect that will happen right from the off, with the CL qualifiers, and it may continue once again into the group stages depending on the perceived strength of the group. Indeed, I'd expect around 4 changes for every mid-week CL match and in the neighbourhood of 7-8 changes for Carling Cup matches. Why? Because I truly believe that Rafa worries about burning players out early in the season by having them play twice a week. So, I expect that he'll select a fairly settled side in the league and switch things up a bit for the midweek cup matches.
Will this amount to 75 changes in 15 games or whatever the numbers were last year? I doubt it but it won't be a million miles off, IMO. That raises the crucial question: will there be enough continuity in league selections--regardless of the teams put out in the cups--to build momentum and understanding? I hope so and, indeed, I think so. I suspect we'll look a lot like we did down the stretch last season--a settled side (formation-wise and selection-wise) with a few more or less predictable like-for-like swaps for the midweek cup matches. Like Mick, I do think Rafa will have learned something vital from the run-in last season but, like many others, I don't think that will stop him from switching the team around when we shift from league to cup competitions and back again.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests