Liverpool FC Forum

by **Leonmc0708** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:54 pm

s@int wrote:I have noticed that if you post a reply and vote at the same time the post doesn't appear. Maybe thats a possible answer?

I can't see any reason why peewee would lie about a disappearing post, or why Bob would say he hadn't deleted a post if he had. Obviously the problem lies elsewhere.

There is no record of as post, and it is alo impossible to vote and post at the same time.

Peewee likes to make out like he is some kind of valant crusader when as has been proven, not just here but in another thread that he is a liar.

Peewee, you are a liar.

by **Sabre** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:01 pm

s@int wrote:I have noticed that if you post a reply and vote at the same time the post doesn't appear. Maybe thats a possible answer?

I can't see any reason why peewee would lie about a disappearing post, or why Bob would say he hadn't deleted a post if he had. Obviously the problem lies elsewhere.

If we assume it's true a post can dissapear, then Peewee should be more lenient with the mods and give them the benefit of doubt instead claiming the mods delete posts. He could clarify the situation via PM and solve it, but he preffers saying a mod deleted a post.

And it's not the first time he does something similar, when I was a mod he made up, he created from NOTHING, with no evidence at all that I was responsible for his removal as a mod, he also said that I complained when the logs and the mods said I didn't.

In a nutshell Peewee has a history of creating trouble to the mods, and he should stop that.

by **account deleted by request** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:00 pm

Sabre wrote:
s@int wrote:I have noticed that if you post a reply and vote at the same time the post doesn't appear. Maybe thats a possible answer?

I can't see any reason why peewee would lie about a disappearing post, or why Bob would say he hadn't deleted a post if he had. Obviously the problem lies elsewhere.

If we assume it's true a post can dissapear, then Peewee should be more lenient with the mods and give them the benefit of doubt instead claiming the mods delete posts. He could clarify the situation via PM and solve it, but he preffers saying a mod deleted a post.

And it's not the first time he does something similar, when I was a mod he made up, he created from NOTHING, with no evidence at all that I was responsible for his removal as a mod, he also said that I complained when the logs and the mods said I didn't.

In a nutshell Peewee has a history of creating trouble to the mods, and he should stop that.

I know that history is important to Liverpool and maybe Sociadad Sabre, but dreging up what happened when you and peewee were mods isn't really going to help matters is it mate

If its not what I suggested before, I am at a loss as to what could have happened, that doesn't however prove or even suggest anyone is lying.

Maybe we should just chalk it up as another mystery of life and move on, or maybe they could deal with it in pm as you suggested.

by **112-1077774096** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:08 pm

the fact that a moderator can call someone such a thing without even the slightest proof is a disgrace and a complaint has been made

by **Leonmc0708** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:09 pm

peewee wrote:the fact that a moderator can call someone such a thing without even the slightest proof is a disgrace and a complaint has been made

The proof has come from the moderators log, just as it did lat time.

by **Sabre** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:11 pm

S@int

I know that history is important to Liverpool and maybe Sociadad Sabre, but dreging up what happened when you and peewee were mods isn't really going to help matters is it mate

If its not what I suggested before, I am at a loss as to what could have happened, that doesn't however prove or even suggest anyone is lying.

Maybe we should just chalk it up as another mystery of life and move on, or maybe they could deal with it in pm as you suggested.

Well, it may not help and no doubt it will be answered in kind, but context is important in this case to understand why some mods are píssed, otherwise Peewee will pretend to be the good boy that hasn't broken a dish and who's victim of bad mod's repression.

Particularly I think Peewee has been OK with me and in the forum as of late (less fights than he used to have). I think aswell he is valued by many posters, and I even find refreshing the AntiRafa posts because at the end of the day if we all were pro Rafa this board would be boring. I wouldn't have a trouble at all with him if he didn't make this kind of crusades, most of which were precisely started when the events I've remembered occured.

All I'm saying is that he should focus on his posts and leave alone the mods, other than that, his posting is OK, and as far as I can see, he's liked by not few people.

by **112-1077774096** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:16 pm

Sabre wrote:S@int

I know that history is important to Liverpool and maybe Sociadad Sabre, but dreging up what happened when you and peewee were mods isn't really going to help matters is it mate

If its not what I suggested before, I am at a loss as to what could have happened, that doesn't however prove or even suggest anyone is lying.

Maybe we should just chalk it up as another mystery of life and move on, or maybe they could deal with it in pm as you suggested.

Well, it may not help and no doubt it will be answered in kind, but context is important in this case to understand why some mods are píssed, otherwise Peewee will pretend to be the good boy that hasn't broken a dish and who's victim of bad mod's repression.

Particularly I think Peewee has been OK with me and in the forum as of late (less fights than he used to have). I think aswell he is valued by many posters, and I even find refreshing the AntiRafa posts because at the end of the day if we all were pro Rafa this board should be boring. I wouldn't have a trouble at all with him if he didn't make this kind of crusades, most of which were precisely started when the events I've remembered occured.

All I'm saying is that he should focus on his posts and leave alone the mods, other than that, his posting is OK, and as far as I can see, he's liked by not few people.

sabre i appreciate your comments, but i did write a post that is no longer there, this is a fact mate, as for the reason i have asked the mods to find out, i have got a warning from bob thats obviously based on his friendship with you and lando and that has been complained about now as has leons comment

i dont see what i would have to gain by claiming a post has gone for no reason, but the powers didnt engage any common sense in this, leon dived in with his abuse and bob took great delight in giving a warning as him pm will show, it has been forwarded to SS so he can decide on the bias and decide on the unwarranted attack by leon.

am i an angle/ no far from it, am i being punished here for past things that went unpunished, of course i am

by **Leonmc0708** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:18 pm

peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:S@int

I know that history is important to Liverpool and maybe Sociadad Sabre, but dreging up what happened when you and peewee were mods isn't really going to help matters is it mate

If its not what I suggested before, I am at a loss as to what could have happened, that doesn't however prove or even suggest anyone is lying.

Maybe we should just chalk it up as another mystery of life and move on, or maybe they could deal with it in pm as you suggested.

Well, it may not help and no doubt it will be answered in kind, but context is important in this case to understand why some mods are píssed, otherwise Peewee will pretend to be the good boy that hasn't broken a dish and who's victim of bad mod's repression.

Particularly I think Peewee has been OK with me and in the forum as of late (less fights than he used to have). I think aswell he is valued by many posters, and I even find refreshing the AntiRafa posts because at the end of the day if we all were pro Rafa this board should be boring. I wouldn't have a trouble at all with him if he didn't make this kind of crusades, most of which were precisely started when the events I've remembered occured.

All I'm saying is that he should focus on his posts and leave alone the mods, other than that, his posting is OK, and as far as I can see, he's liked by not few people.

sabre i appreciate your comments, but i did write a post that is no longer there, this is a fact mate, as for the reason i have asked the mods to find out, i have got a warning from bob thats obviously based on his friendship with you and lando and that has been complained about now as has leons comment

i dont see what i would have to gain by claiming a post has gone for no reason, but the powers didnt engage any common sense in this, leon dived in with his abuse and bob took great delight in giving a warning as him pm will show, it has been forwarded to SS so he can decide on the bias and decide on the unwarranted attack by leon.

am i an angle/ no far from it, am i being punished here for past things that went unpunished, of course i am

I pointed out that you have not had a posted deleted, and suggested you are lying about it.

Thats not an attack, if you need an example of a personal attack then read over the PM's that you have sent me today.

by **112-1077774096** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:23 pm

Leonmc0708 wrote:
peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:S@int

I know that history is important to Liverpool and maybe Sociadad Sabre, but dreging up what happened when you and peewee were mods isn't really going to help matters is it mate

If its not what I suggested before, I am at a loss as to what could have happened, that doesn't however prove or even suggest anyone is lying.

Maybe we should just chalk it up as another mystery of life and move on, or maybe they could deal with it in pm as you suggested.

Well, it may not help and no doubt it will be answered in kind, but context is important in this case to understand why some mods are píssed, otherwise Peewee will pretend to be the good boy that hasn't broken a dish and who's victim of bad mod's repression.

Particularly I think Peewee has been OK with me and in the forum as of late (less fights than he used to have). I think aswell he is valued by many posters, and I even find refreshing the AntiRafa posts because at the end of the day if we all were pro Rafa this board should be boring. I wouldn't have a trouble at all with him if he didn't make this kind of crusades, most of which were precisely started when the events I've remembered occured.

All I'm saying is that he should focus on his posts and leave alone the mods, other than that, his posting is OK, and as far as I can see, he's liked by not few people.

sabre i appreciate your comments, but i did write a post that is no longer there, this is a fact mate, as for the reason i have asked the mods to find out, i have got a warning from bob thats obviously based on his friendship with you and lando and that has been complained about now as has leons comment

i dont see what i would have to gain by claiming a post has gone for no reason, but the powers didnt engage any common sense in this, leon dived in with his abuse and bob took great delight in giving a warning as him pm will show, it has been forwarded to SS so he can decide on the bias and decide on the unwarranted attack by leon.

am i an angle/ no far from it, am i being punished here for past things that went unpunished, of course i am

I pointed out that you have not had a posted deleted, and suggested you are lying about it.

Thats not an attack, if you need an example of a personal attack then read over the PM's that you have sent me today.

to call someone a liar is a personal attack and how would you expect me to respond to such a statement. i know i wrote a post, i dont know where it has gone, you tell me where it has gone, unless you can do that then i again suggest you retract your comment and i will retract my complaint about your comment. i have asked you to check if there is a bug in the system, have you done that? probably not

we both know its bang out of order leon

maybe while you are at it you can tell us all what you think i was hoping to gain from lying about a post, i wasn't in dispute with anyone, i wasn't arguing with anyone, so come on leon, fill us all in

by **Sabre** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:25 pm

So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

P.S. And for the record, it may be possible that a post dissapear in a database, or that an error of a database leads to the load of a previous state of the database (a rollback), so you're right, you're not necessarily a liar because the logs say there was not deletion of posts. Let's admit that computers has this things, there was a misunderstanding (you accused/they were :censored:

because they were innocent and called you a liar) and move on.

by **112-1077774096** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:27 pm

Sabre wrote:So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

i got a card from bob without even the slightest investigation mate, its obvious from his comments its something he has been itching to do and is based on bias, i will leave it in the hands of the good mods to sort out.

by **Leonmc0708** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:31 pm

peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

i got a card from bob without even the slightest investigation mate, its obvious from his comments its something he has been itching to do and is based on bias, i will leave it in the hands of the good mods to sort out.

Who are the good Mods ?

I know me and Bob will be the Bad ones, but where do the rest fit in :

St Michael
JMac
Woof
Red37
Supersub

by **112-1077774096** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:35 pm

Leonmc0708 wrote:
peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

i got a card from bob without even the slightest investigation mate, its obvious from his comments its something he has been itching to do and is based on bias, i will leave it in the hands of the good mods to sort out.

Who are the good Mods ?

I know me and Bob will be the Bad ones, but where do the rest fit in :

St Michael
JMac
Woof
Red37
Supersub

tedious ,leon, keep digging that hole mate, the best thing you can do with your time is retract your comment or find conclusive proof that there is no fault with the software that will remove or not register posts, and until you can do that you comment is the sign of total ignorance, its based on your belief which is wrong, i asked you if you made any effort to find out if there is a fault, you dont answer and come bag with a question aimed at stirring it, try that on the kids mate, not on me

by **Bad Bob** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:39 pm

peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

i got a card from bob without even the slightest investigation mate, its obvious from his comments its something he has been itching to do and is based on bias, i will leave it in the hands of the good mods to sort out.

You got a warning because you have completely handled the situation in the wrong way from the very beginning. End of.

by **Leonmc0708** » Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:40 pm

peewee wrote:
Leonmc0708 wrote:
peewee wrote:
Sabre wrote:So in conclussion the best thing will be to move on and keep discussing about normal newkit affairs Peewee?

Because asking the mods to investigate something that it's not even registered in the logs is a no-end street. They don't have the tools to investigate that.

I don't know who exactly carded you, but I don't think you've been punnished for past events. I think you've just received a warning in order the situation doesn't scalate. A warning is not a punnishment.

And you and I know it will be removed for Christmas, a time of good will. So why don't we just move on and talk about Kuyt is good or not good enough?

i got a card from bob without even the slightest investigation mate, its obvious from his comments its something he has been itching to do and is based on bias, i will leave it in the hands of the good mods to sort out.

Who are the good Mods ?

I know me and Bob will be the Bad ones, but where do the rest fit in :

St Michael
JMac
Woof
Red37
Supersub

tedious ,leon, keep digging that hole mate, the best thing you can do with your time is retract your comment or find conclusive proof that there is no fault with the software that will remove or not register posts, and until you can do that you comment is the sign of total ignorance, its based on your belief which is wrong, i asked you if you made any effort to find out if there is a fault, you dont answer and come bag with a question aimed at stirring it, try that on the kids mate, not on me

A post is not a post until it has been posted.

Once posted its recorded in the database.

Anything deleted from the database is recorded.

The log has been checked and no posts of yours have been deleted.

If it was a thought you had, or you forgot to click POST then maybe thats the reason it was not recorded ?

Also this is the internet mate, the best thing I can do is get on with my real life, which I will. I will not need conclusive proof unless you intend to persue this slander through hte courts, in which case let me know and I will give you my solicitors details.

Liverpool FC Forum

Halfway - What points tally must we aim at?

Halfway - What points tally must we aim at?

Who is online