by bigmick » Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:48 pm
It's an interesting one this "the criticism of Rafa has to stop". Some of the criticism is over the top and premature for sure, but it has to stop?
There have been many people on the boards willing to dismiss the various ex-players, press preople, media and pundits who have waded into Rafa and fair play to them for that. Many would have you believe our dip in form is nothing to do with rotation, not the managers fault, nothing to do with members of the coaching staff leaving etc etc.
Usually this group of people are more of the opinion that it's the bloke who pulls on the shirt and crosses the white line who is to blame more than the manager. The bloke who picks up more in a week than most of us earn in a year who should be accountable, and fair enough. Sometimes this group of people also believe that perhaps nobody is much to blame it's just a blip, or that injuries are the reason for our downturn in form and once players come back we'll get back to our very best. All this is absolutely fair enough, as is the listing of our achievements under Rafa, and pointing out that he has built a top-class squad.
On the other hand of course there are those that think that rotation on the level which we employ it is detrimental to the success of the team, particularly in the League. Sometimes they also point to the perception that Rafa isn't a good "man manager" or that he appears aloof from the players.
So who's right? Well time will tell, but here's a thought.
If the team doesn't achieve a position/points total/results etc which is roughly equal to the potential sum of its parts what do you do. It seems to me you have three scenarios, if for instance we were to finish third and fifteen points off the top of the league.
1. You accept it as "one of those things", come to the conclusion that the team is only currently that good, the "table doesn't lie" etc etc. Perhaps you reason that the team will gel better with another season under their belts and show some patience. Ferguson, as the "don't criticise Rafa" camp have pointed out took seven years to deliver the ittle to Old Trafford, Rafa has only (or will only have had) four. That said, the team isn't getting any younger, Wenger and Mourinho didn't take quite so long, and would such a result represent enough progress to keep people happy?
2. As the "stop criticising Rafa" camp tell us, it's the players. If we underachieve by common concensus, then perhaps some of the players need shipping out. Perhaps you blame it on the plyers, in which case you've got change the players. This of course is assuming that as they have failed to be motivated sufficiently during the course of a whole season, it is unlikely the same management style is going to propel them to greater hieghts the following season. Failing that you accept that they simply aren't good enough, and go and buy some more that are.
3. You come to the conclusion that the manager isn't extracting the most out of the players which are available to him. Whether it's rotation, aloofness or whatever theory you have, you change the manager.
That seems to me to the options if we were to underachieve. You do nothing, change the players or change the manager.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".