Why we should be above man united - + VIDEO TECHNOLOGY DEBATE

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby zarababe » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:08 pm

.. Good point Super.. the game is in danger of becoming rather Jurassic.. if technology that is at it's disposal is shunned because of some archaic traditions..  eliminating crucial "errors" which impact on championship, relegation, promotions and ultimately winning, drawing and losing surely should be piloted .. for the very issues raised; time-outs, practicalities etc.. but lets not dismiss it totally ... this game will always remain that of opinions... as most things in life !
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby 115-1073096938 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:16 pm

The games not about opinions, its about blind facts.

You can't have a "better opinion" than someone. Maybe a more informed one, but not better.

If it was all about opinions the tops teams wouldn't always finish top. Lets face it, you put Arsenal against a sunday league side, they'd probably be 20 up by half time, is that down to an opinion of a fact that arsenal have better players?
115-1073096938
 

Postby zarababe » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:30 pm

... Chill pill Stu :;):

Facts are those that often can not be dispelled .. but football is most definately full of opinions ..

It is my opinion that ... Maradonna is the greatest player in the world.. others will say Pele.. and so the debate rages...

It is a fact that Spurs.. scored and the ref did not give it...

The argument about the use of technology .. is raging on the views and opinions of supporters.. but informed by some appauling refereeing decisions based on facts that can not be disputed (the ball was over the line , a handball occured, the foul was inside and not outside the box etc etc )

Some opinions are informed, some are made through ignornace, blind faith, hangers-on etc...

.. and so this is a forum of facts, opinions and laffs and anger... but that is my opinion.. :p
Last edited by zarababe on Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby 115-1073096938 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:05 pm

Right so you're saying its not a fact? Well ok, lets put it like this...

Steven Gerrard is better than the average sunday league player.

Opinion or fact?

I'm sorry, but anyone who says thats an opinion and not a fact is talking out of there backside. Teams finish above teams for a reason and players are better than other players. Every attribute in football is a fact, IE Craig Bellamy is quicker than Sami Hyypia. The point is, when it comes to passing, tackling etc its down to judgement without there being a defining answer. Just because there isn't a stupid number or statistic doesn't mean the facts aren't there. The closer they are the harder it is to judge, but it doesn't mean that someone isn't better than someone at something.

Just because someone can't see the facts do not mean they do not exist.
115-1073096938
 

Postby zarababe » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:29 pm

.. of for goodness sake.. are we now gonna rage on about what is a fact and what is an opinion... ???

I have said that some issues in the game are about opinions.. blind ones.. informed ones etc.. and yes others are factual...

.. .. of course SG is better than a sunday league footballer... that is a fact.. but then u are not exactly comparing like for like now are you ?

.. opinions will ultimately shape the decisions sometimes made.. it was the refs opinion, based on his view of the incident, that the ball did not cross the line... Now if he could have consulted a replay of the incident.. then .. it's a fact the ball crossed the line...

   
I was merely concurring that the tecnological debate is about opinions.. as are so many things .. etc etc ..
Last edited by zarababe on Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby 77-1099054247 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:36 pm

murphy0151 wrote:Let’s look at games involving Man United:

August 28th – United one-nil down to Blackburn with a minute to go. A clear handball by Saha in the six yard box lays the ball on a plate to Smith, who equalises.

Sept 20th – United get a non-corner against Liverpool which results in a Silvestre headed goal to squeak them a 2-1 win.

Oct 24th – Wayne Rooney dives - and goes down like a flying pig in the box - at 0-0 against Arsenal. Serial-Old Trafford-penalty-awarder, Mike Riley, gleefully points to the spot, and in a game they never looked like winning, United are gifted the points.

Jan 4th – with the clock ticking down, Tottenham launch a speculative effort from the half way line that Roy ‘Coco’ Carroll throws into his own net. The referee and linesman claim temporary blindness, and that sprinting quickly requires head-down and eyes closed, so it’s not their fault. No goal is awarded and Spurs are robbed. The officials also missed the 20,000 United fans behind the goal holding their heads in horror.

Those are all FACTS - Irrefutable when you look at the replays. Only a United fan would claim that any of these incidents were called correctly.

So, if the referees had made the correct calls, the calculator says that they would have lost to Blackburn and Spurs, and drawn with Liverpool and Arsenal. That’s 2 points instead of the 8 they were actually awarded.

Now, let’s look at Liverpool’s fortunes:

Aug 29th – Luis Garcia scores a goal at Bolton that is CLEARLY on side, but is ruled out. Liverpool, one-nil down at the time, lose the game by the single goal.

Sept 20th – see above

Nov 6th – with Liverpool at home to Birmingham, Muzzy Izzet clearly handles on the line to prevent a goal. The ‘miss’ by the referee also meant that the player remained on the pitch. Liverpool lose the game 1-0.

Nov 20th – at 1-0 down, another Luis Garcia goal is disallowed for offside even though the ball is played off a Middlesbrough defender. Liverpool go on to lose 2-0.

Jan 1st – at 0-0 at home to Chelsea, and totally outplaying them, Liverpool are denied two clear penalties. One when Sinama is wrestled to the ground from behind. The second, as the Chelsea defender clears the ball with his hand that the whole world sees – except of course for one ‘Mike Riley.’ These decisions could have put Liverpool one or two goals up. Instead, they lose one-nil after bossing the game.

So, a defeat at Bolton should have been a draw. A loss to Chelsea should have been a win. A defeat at Man United should have been a draw. Let’s be conservative here and say the Muzzy Izzet decision would have earned us a point (in reality it could well have been 3 against 10 men) and the Boro result stands as they scored 2 anyway.

So, that means the 5 defeats suffered in these games would actually have been three draws, a win and one defeat. That’s 6 points instead of none.

So, if you do the maths, United lose 6 points they currently have, while Liverpool gain 6. That means that instead of United having 44 points, they would have 38. Instead of Liverpool having 37, we would have 43.

WE should be something like 5 points ahead of them, NOT 7 points behind!!

Now, I’m sure anti-Liverpool (or pro-United) fans reading this will claim that you can point out all sorts of bad calls throughout the season that can impact games. But these are CLEAR errors that have been PROVEN to be errors. I’m sure there are some minor incidents I’ve missed, but the ones listed here had a direct impact on the results of those games. I’ve tried hard to remember incidents where United have been hard done by – I honestly can’t remember any. Similarly, I’ve tried to recall incidents where Liverpool have benefited from referees decisions. The only one I can think of is recently against Norwich – Jamie Carragher’s ‘hand ball,’ which I am 100% convinced was ‘ball-to-hand’ as the player was trying to move his hand AWAY from the ball as it hit him. Even the Newcastle game, which we eventually won, saw one of the most off-side goals ever seen awarded to Patrick Kluivert. Thankfully, that blatant error had no bearing on the final result.

In contrast, have Man United had any off-side goals awarded against them? Have they had any opposing defenders punch the ball out of their area or off the goal line? Have they scored any on-side goals that have been disallowed? If they have, I don’t recall them. In fact, things could have been even worse for them as they should have had Van Nistelrooy sent off against Arsenal and Rooney sent off against Bolton. Video evidence, banning them both belatedly for 3 games, proves it. But a belated ban didn’t help Arsenal or Bolton, both of whom lost those games when they should have been playing against 10 men.

So, while Liverpool lie 5th, we should be 3rd and Man United the ones actually in 5th place - and completely out of the title race with 38 points.

Pah! A load of biased poo.

Of course, you fail to mention unfair decisions to us and you mention what has gone wrong you lot! And of course, your players never seem to do anything wrong too!

We're above you-quit the excuses and get over it!
77-1099054247
 

Postby 115-1073096938 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:39 pm

Part of the game, always has been and always should be.

I'm sick to death of all this change nonense. The idiots at the top have already devalued the Uefa cup (probably the hardest trophy to win before all this stupid ****** change was brought in) and scrapped the cup winners cup.

The cup winners cup should be brought back, the onlly teams ALLOWED in the champions league should be the champions and compitition winners. There should be no video refs either.

The only "change" for referees i wouldn't be against is the 4th official, who in truth does ****** all anyways should look after the time keeping, 20 seconds for a goal, 20-30 seconds for a subsitution and any time wasting.

No how no way, should any other stupid changes be made. I'm sick of the "debate". If you love something you love it for what it is. I love football and all its imperfections. You either love it, or you dont.
115-1073096938
 

Postby 115-1073096938 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:42 pm

Utd fan, do you agree you get rediculous decisions at ur ground all the time and do you agree Mike Riley seems to do his best to make sure your lot win?

I remember this season at your ground, You beat us, how on earth did you get a corner and a freekick for the goals.

The corner came of your player, EVERYONE could see that. The free kick was another PATHETIC decision.

Apart from Carragher's "hand ball" against Norwich, name another decision which has gone our way this season?
115-1073096938
 

Postby yckatbjywtbiastkamb » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:51 pm

we had some things go our way when we were the dominant force in the game. the decisions have ****** me off but i`ve seen enough footy over the years to know some go for you, some go against you.
the real albatross around our necks this season has been the injuries to key players.
Image

You Can Shoot All The Blue Jays You Want To But Its A Sin To Kill A Mocking Bird
User avatar
yckatbjywtbiastkamb
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1435
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 8:19 pm

Postby 77-1099054247 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:56 pm

stu_the_red wrote:Utd fan, do you agree you get rediculous decisions at ur ground all the time and do you agree Mike Riley seems to do his best to make sure your lot win?

Ridiculous decisions all the time? ???

No, not always.

As for Riley...well, as I've expressed before, he is a bad referee and ask the majority United fans, they will say that they don't like him.

He should not be able to referee big matches but there you go. And against Arsenal, he denied us a blatant penalty later in the game, just because he gave us one earlier. The whole Rooney incident maybe wasn't a penalty but you could say it kind of evened up. As for those penalties he awarded us earlier at OT...well, some of them were penalties...others were arguable.

But every week we see blatant refereeing mistakes...just happens that ours get highlighted more!
77-1099054247
 

Postby The_Rock » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:09 pm

ManUtd wrote:As for Riley...well, as I've expressed before, he is a bad referee and ask the majority United fans, they will say that they don't like him.

how could the scum fans hate a ref who keeps awarding your team a penalty everytime he refs at old thrashford....
A Genius Billionaire Playboy Philanthropist
Image
User avatar
The_Rock
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 2:30 pm
Location: Michigan, Toronto and Singapore...take your pick

Postby zarababe » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:12 pm

stu_the_red wrote:Part of the game, always has been and always should be.

I'm sick to death of all this change nonense. The idiots at the top have already devalued the Uefa cup (probably the hardest trophy to win before all this stupid ****** change was brought in) and scrapped the cup winners cup.

The cup winners cup should be brought back, the onlly teams ALLOWED in the champions league should be the champions and compitition winners. There should be no video refs either.

The only "change" for referees i wouldn't be against is the 4th official, who in truth does ****** all anyways should look after the time keeping, 20 seconds for a goal, 20-30 seconds for a subsitution and any time wasting.

No how no way, should any other stupid changes be made. I'm sick of the "debate". If you love something you love it for what it is. I love football and all its imperfections. You either love it, or you dont.

... I understand where ure coming from.. and up until recenlty I wud have been dead against the use of replays etc.. for the reasons u stipulate...  but some decisons are scandalous.. and while they add to the debate .. such errors can be the difference between surviving in the league and dropping down a division..

..whilst it's always been the way... we are now technologically able to prevent such errors.. I say a pilot is worth a go.. and shud be looked in to.. if games like Cricket can move with the times to enhance their sport.. then football shud at the least explore this ..
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby mrcool2003 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:23 pm

shoulud it not only be used for debatable over the line/not over the line decisions, video technology, would be too much for offside decisions, but surely since it doesnt happen all that often to involve video replays for debatable line calls, or alternatively have 4 linesmen cause to be honest, some of those lines men are fat ******
User avatar
mrcool2003
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 4:39 pm

Postby zarababe » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:32 pm

.. what ???
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby JBG » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:47 pm

Every now and again football needs a slight twinging of the rules. The game today is radically different now then a 100 years ago, with the introduction of nets, cards, huge changes in off side rules etc.

Change should only come when its desperately needed though, such as the change in the back pass rule after the 1986 and 1990 World Cups when it was getting clear that the sport was in danger from negative play.

My own opinion is that the limited use of technology as an aid to the referee should be looked at, in the same way as technology has aided the development of the game since its inception, be it the change in manufacture of balls and kit or satelite tv allowing people in, say, Africa, watch their team play at a World Cup in Europe.
Jolly Bob Grumbine.
User avatar
JBG
LFC Elite Member
 
Posts: 10621
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:32 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e