stu_the_red wrote:absolutely great post, but I can't say i didn't know this already. But i must say i am FOR video ref's.
Video refs tho should only be used for 3 calls -
Offsides
Ball Crossing the line
Penalties
Therefore the game stays in action untill a potentially game changing call is missed and looked at by the ref watching the monitor. You don't need to stop the game but you need to have a good way to restart play.
Right,
1. So everytime a player is offside they have to use a video ref? Sorry, no. This happens on average 20 times a game. Now, say for example its that close you can't decide. One person has one opinion, one has another, then what do you do?
What about if a player is through on goal, he WAS NOT offside, but it is given by the official who makes a mistake? Then what? do you have a drop ball? Hardly fair if the player was through on goal.
What about if the keeper makes a great reflex save from a striker who is offside, it falls to a defender who plays a long ball upfield to a striker who controls it then fires into the top corner. Then what do you do?
Pathetic idea if you ask me.
2. Ball crossing the line, what if the ball doesn't cross the line and the ball was to stay in play, the team who didn't conceed went up the other end and rattled one in, what would happen there? Would you stop play and then bring play back? How ****** do you want this game to get? Also, what happens at sunday league level when there is a decision like this? Do you change the rules specifically for the professionals? Pro rules and amatuer rules? Brilliant, i love your mode of thought.
3. Your last one is an opinion. I disagree with people all the time about this. It won't solve a ****** thing.
You people really p!55 me off. Go and support another boring sport where there are no talking points, the best sides ALWAYS win etc etc.
The other good thing about football, how many would want video refs is Exeter were to go to Man Utd, win 1-0 and score via a goal that never was?
Its ****** rediculous.
I can't believe you idiots want to ruin this game. I was quite calm when i started this post, now i just feel like punching someone.
Another plus point is as someone just made, refs will become to scared to make ANY decision on there own. ITS A ****** DISCRACE!!!
So a shots going in the top corner and the play gets stopped...First of all this would employ a new ref that can halt play at any given time, and just because its close doesn't mean you strip all authority from the Ar's.
What I'm sayin is the refs should follow a "if it's not broken don't fix it" policy, so you don't stop play to review offsides untill the ref who is watchin the monitors decides it's a bad call.
For your great reflex save by the keeper question the simple answer is a rule called ADVANTAGE you ******. If the man was offsides and the goal was scored it would have been revoked after it was reviewed in the time it took for the restart to play, but if he blocks it off and his team go on a break you continue play because stopping the play would be to a detriment of the victim.
To the ball that didnt cross the line? If it didnt cross the line then it's not a goal..... I don't know what else there is to that question.
Yes penalty kicks is a personal opinion but i feel that it could be administered effectively by refs if indeed a penalty is given it can be reviewed by the ref watchin the monitor that can see if the player dove, whether a yellow/red card should be awards, or if the foul occured outside the box.
Why would refs be scared to make calls because of this? They are already scared to make calls. The FA doesnt punish refs and if they are wrong they are wrong, but at least there is redemption in this system.
stu_the_red wrote:So a shots going in the top corner and the play gets stopped...First of all this would employ a new ref that can halt play at any given time, and just because its close doesn't mean you strip all authority from the Ar's.
How do propose we re-start play?What I'm sayin is the refs should follow a "if it's not broken don't fix it" policy, so you don't stop play to review offsides untill the ref who is watchin the monitors decides it's a bad call.
What if the ref needs time to assess, not all decisions can be made in 10 seconds also, ALOT can happen in 10 seconds in football. Secondly, again, how do you fairly re-start play if the match was stopped for nothing? Also, if its not broke don't fix it? We've never had this technology in the sport for over 120 years, so to me that says the beautiful game isn't broke. As you say, if it isn't broke don't fix it.For your great reflex save by the keeper question the simple answer is a rule called ADVANTAGE you ******. If the man was offsides and the goal was scored it would have been revoked after it was reviewed in the time it took for the restart to play, but if he blocks it off and his team go on a break you continue play because stopping the play would be to a detriment of the victim.
It wouldn't work. Like i've said, a team can go from one end of the pitch to the other and score in 20 seconds, sometimes it may take longer than that to decide if a ball is well over the line or not. So if that happens, the second goal is dissallowed? I'm sorry that isn't football.To the ball that didnt cross the line? If it didnt cross the line then it's not a goal..... I don't know what else there is to that question.
Right, so it doesn't cross the line, play is stopped to see if it did, how and where do you restart? a drop ball on the goaline? a penalty? or do you wait till the ball next goes out of play which might not happen for a few minutes, then bring the play ALL THE WAY BACK to where it was?Yes penalty kicks is a personal opinion but i feel that it could be administered effectively by refs if indeed a penalty is given it can be reviewed by the ref watchin the monitor that can see if the player dove, whether a yellow/red card should be awards, or if the foul occured outside the box.
Right, so everytime there is a penalty decision the ref would be to scared to make the call instead of getting it wrong. Then what if the ref gives it, or stops play then asks for a replay and finds out the player dived? or simply slipped?
Or what if the ref didn't give it then the replay shows it should have been a penalty... do you again bring play back? Pathetic if you ask me.Why would refs be scared to make calls because of this? They are already scared to make calls. The FA doesnt punish refs and if they are wrong they are wrong, but at least there is redemption in this system.
Your redemption wouldn't work. Its a joke to suggest changing this. You also haven't coverd cost, what happens to sunday league and lower clubs? do the rules change for the premiership clubs? Like i said, its an absoloute disgrace that anyone who who "loves" the game wants to change it. Contraversy is a massive part of the game and always has been. Thats the beauty of the game, thats what helps small clubs beat big clubs, thats what causes the game to be what it is.
If people don't like it, they should ****** off. I'm sick of this pathetic arguement. Its a joke, disgrace and sickening soloution to something which has never been an issue untill recently.
If you love something you don't want it to change, you love what it is. Not what you think it could become.
I would seriously go for someone who said that infront of me. Its bloody offensive.
stu_the_red wrote:Video technology should be at ALL levels including kids or none at all. Once video technology comes in you are changing the game and the rules to much so that it can't be implimented at lower levels which in my opinion will start the death of the game. If this happens, i will simply stop loving football at the highest level.
Leonmc0708 wrote:I know it means little, but notice how most teams figures are 1 or 2 points out, and ours are 7 pts. Also we would be third and only six points of Chelski.....
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 82 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.