Lallana in Pyjamas » Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:08 am wrote:It’s clear that for Klopp Clyne was at best 4th choice RB - he wasn’t playing , one start in the league in about 18 months , a lot of times not even in the squad
It’s funny how a player suddenly becomes something he clearly wasn’t just because he leaves
damjan193 » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:34 am wrote:Lallana in Pyjamas » Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:08 am wrote:It’s clear that for Klopp Clyne was at best 4th choice RB - he wasn’t playing , one start in the league in about 18 months , a lot of times not even in the squad
It’s funny how a player suddenly becomes something he clearly wasn’t just because he leaves
Come on Lallana. Clyne was a good back-up player. I think what everyone is saying is that HE SHOULD have played more games, and he should have been here to provide the much needed cover for our injured right backs. IMO, had we kept him and played him against Leicester instead of Hendo we might have won that game.
Like mags said, I don't mind not signing anyone during the transfer window, real life isn't football manager, but letting Clyne go at this stage of the season was bloody ridiculous, even you should agree with that.
damjan193 » Mon Feb 04, 2019 11:23 am wrote:It's not what Clyne would have done but rather what your favorite player Henderson would have if he was played where he always plays. We lacked control in midfield and IMO that's where we lost the game, had Hendo played there along with the other two I think we would have done better. But since we lacked a proper back-up RB, we played Hendo there who has probably never played in that position before, and more importantly, by doing so we disrupted the balance of our midfiled by being forced to play two players that have never played together in a midfield of two.
Regardless of this game, Clyne should have stayed and played, I'd rather have players playing in their natural position than play Milner everywhere. And before you say it, YES, I know that that's what the manager wanted, that's pretty obvious mate and I don't know why you repeat the same thing to everyone, we all know it. The debate is whether it's the right call or not.
Some people’s ability level seem to improve when they don’t play
woof woof ! » Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:58 pm wrote:Some people’s ability level seem to improve when they don’t play
You're full of Sh*t. (as usual).
Clyne is an accomplished player, irks me when ***** like yourself question his ability .
He may not be the best "fit" for our team but right now his ability would be welcomed by me.
RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:54 pm wrote:Once again ,this club retains the proclivity to mystify by letting a golden opportunity like the transfer window sail by whilst in dire need of defenders.I just cant believe that a RB wasn't brought in after Clyne was allowed to leave ,I mean its alright to say in hindsight we could have retained his services but the fact remains he was the only cover we had for Trent,that alone should have f*cking surely stalled his departure
So our much highlighted frailty at the back is now once again in question and gives hope to those fighting to pull us back,its just complete madness given the chance to fortify our charge for the title was there to grasp with the window and we strangely deemed playing midfielders out of position as the much better option.
It just f*cking tinpot :angry:
Lallana in Pyjamas » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:59 pm wrote:RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:54 pm wrote:Once again ,this club retains the proclivity to mystify by letting a golden opportunity like the transfer window sail by whilst in dire need of defenders.I just cant believe that a RB wasn't brought in after Clyne was allowed to leave ,I mean its alright to say in hindsight we could have retained his services but the fact remains he was the only cover we had for Trent,that alone should have f*cking surely stalled his departure
So our much highlighted frailty at the back is now once again in question and gives hope to those fighting to pull us back,its just complete madness given the chance to fortify our charge for the title was there to grasp with the window and we strangely deemed playing midfielders out of position as the much better option.
It just f*cking tinpot :angry:
Clyne wasn’t our only cover for RB
The only time he played was when
TAA , Gomez and Milner were out injured - that makes him 4th choice and Klopp let him go because he also appears to have faith in Camacho - because they all offer more going forward and to provide the width from the full backs .
Defensively we are still alongside City the strongest in the league - the CB’s and the likes of Henderson and Fabinho are key to covering the full backs when they go forward.
RED BEERGOGGLES » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:54 pm wrote:Once again ,this club retains the proclivity to mystify by letting a golden opportunity like the transfer window sail by whilst in dire need of defenders.I just cant believe that a RB wasn't brought in after Clyne was allowed to leave ,I mean its alright to say in hindsight we could have retained his services but the fact remains he was the only cover we had for Trent,that alone should have f*cking surely stalled his departure
So our much highlighted frailty at the back is now once again in question and gives hope to those fighting to pull us back,its just complete madness given the chance to fortify our charge for the title was there to grasp with the window and we strangely deemed playing midfielders out of position as the much better option.
It just f*cking tinpot :angry:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.