Liverpool FC Forum

Benny The Noon wrote:There is a difference between getting 10% extra desire and getting players to perform better compared to changing someones attitude and work ethic .

I would have thought that

getting 10% extra desire and getting players to perform better

were pretty much the same as

changing someones attitude and work ethic

I'd send you a gong to bang on Benny but apparently you've already got one.

Benny The Noon wrote:Players like Mata , Navas , Gago etc are totally unproven in the prem .

We have been down the road of buying players from abroad at the truck full with a mixture of success - time for us to get a good strong prem team and players that are comfortable playing in the prem and have proven expirence in the prem .

Christ ! you've already got me thinking that getting rid of Konchesky was a mistake 

Zidane wrote:I've heard 18.5, no media outlet will announce an accurate fee imo. They all have an agenda against us no one will convince me otherwise. We spent a supposed 20m on henderson 10m on adam when both were never announced yet you hear nothing about the money the mancs spent on young and jones. Young had one year left on his contract they overpaid.  Jones was in the region of 20m yet you don't hear anything while our fees are constantly being used against us and our signings.

I've heard (not from the papers) that the fees were 18.5, 13.5/16.5 and 7.5.  Id rather put my trust on supposed ITKs instead of the media but you can believe whichever you want.

I was saying the exact same thing yesterday to my bro.

Our fees are being touted like we've paid 20 for Henderson, 10 for Adam and 20 for Downing, when in reality I believe those fees are what they could raise to based on appearances and performances.  The fees they are supposed to state are 16.5, 7.5 and 18.5(? don't really know yet).

But then manure's signings come crawling along and they say Young for 17, De Gea for 18 and Jones for 17, but all of those players will eventually cost manure over £20 million... The media just tries to make it look like we overpay by so much and manure steal all the good deals, when in reality our young Mid was less than their young CB, our winger from the same club was about the same as theirs, but ours was voted their player of the season and had an extra year on his contract, and the goal keeper we're about to sign costs about 1/20th of what theirs cost 

The media love to justify every move manure make, and make us look like complete fools.  You don't hear so much about getting a great deal for a great player in Suarez, you hear about us over paying for Carroll.  You don't hear about us signing Meireles for what most believe is actually a great deal, you hear about us wasting money on Poulson and Konchesky.  But when it comes to manure you don't hear about them wasting money on Bebe, you hear about the great signing they made in Chicharito.

It's absolute bull sh!t and people, including Liverpool fans, buy right into it.  They follow the media and think we overpay for all our players when in reality, we are doing just as good if not better than any other big club. We sure aren't paying 30 a player like city and chelsea.  We sure aren't losing any of our best players like Arsenal look set to.  We get the players we need and we get them for a fair price.

I'd much rather pay the 7.5 for Adam than 35 for Sneijder.  Sneijder is the spanish league wasn't good enough until he went to the slower, less physcial Italian league where Aqualani also had a good sign.

Have a little faith guys... We are doing great in the transfer window.  I have no doubt we will sign a CB and a LB and after that I will be 100% happy with the business we've done.

Benny The Noon wrote:Konchesky should never off been bought in the first place - 4 mil ?!  Christ what were we thinking .

What were we thinking ?

I dunno, maybe they anticipated your recent post

time for us to get a good strong prem team and players that are comfortable playing in the prem and have proven expirence in the prem

woof woof ! wrote:

Benny The Noon wrote:Konchesky should never off been bought in the first place - 4 mil ?!  Christ what were we thinking .

What were we thinking ?

I dunno, maybe they anticipated your recent post

time for us to get a good strong prem team and players that are comfortable playing in the prem and have proven expirence in the prem

They also have to have a bit of quality and not have a psycho mum 

redtrader74 wrote:Downing is decent, and probably has the right attitude, he is not special either, more a consistent 7/10 player every game, but £20m? ? For some reason we are being raped again on the prices. The players we have bought seemed to make it clear they want to join us, so why are we paying over the odds?

Quoting this post, but this applies to all concerned about the supposed pricing..some things to consider

1. As stated, we are not an overly attractive option to the 'star' players, 1 because we don't offer European football and 2 because it is pretty clear since ownership changed is that the relative gravy train experienced at Man U, Man City and Chelsea is not stopping at Anfield...so those people who are financially inclined will not be coming simple as that. Boo !n hoo.

2. Clearly there is a strategy to move away from European supermo primadonnas and build a core of grafters and reinstill the values of LFC from the ground up, without the disruption of someone like Torres.

3. Look at the clubs that we are targeting at the moment. In most cases we are poaching their best player, whilst the player has several years on his contract. Would we have let Gerrard at 27 go off to Chelsea underpriced? Or would it have been overpriced like Torres? Forget about jumping to conclusions about me comparing Downing to Gerrard etc, I am referring to the worth/value of that player to said club. Some people (like Gerrard) are seen as irreplacable and the gap left is going to be massive, so of course people will milk it for as much as they can and who can blame them.

4. Noone appears to be looking at the whole picture. Relatively these guys coming in could be WAY cheaper in the long run than any of the 'comparably priced' alternatives you are putting forward. Who knows what the wage bills look like for these guys, but my guess is their starting point is a hell of a lot more humble than a lot of the alternatives put forward here.

I could go on and on here, but take the point. None of you really know what is going on, however you were all made up that Kenny was back.  Whenever the owners have been questioned about putting money into the club (remember the whingers who complained that they actually didn't spend much when Carroll and Suarez came in because of the Torres fee) it seems that they are supporting the management team in every instance. We haven't missed out on anyone and we haven't baulked at spending money. For once we're free of scandal, free of rumours, we have stability and the possibility of a long term future at the top of the game.

I for one am enjoying it all and I shall look forward to seeing whether the tactics are working out throughout the season. Forget about in Kenny we trust blind foolishness, this is LIGHT YEARS from where we were last season and hopefully in 12 months, we'll be LIGHT YEARS ahead from now.

Greavesie wrote:This place could get messy if he doesn't cut it straight away...

Its ok it will be blamed on Rafa