Liverpool FC Forum

by **NANNY RED** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:05 pm

bavlondon wrote:Just read this quote from Comolli.

http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news....terview

Is he (Hodgson) a man you have a lot of respect for?

Obviously. When you see the clubs he has managed and the national teams he has managed, what he's done at Fulham, what he's done at Blackburn

He must be on a p.iss take an all Bav , :laugh:

by **glenbuck patriot** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:06 pm

glenbuck patriot wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
glenbuck patriot wrote:As bad as Hick's & Gillette were & don't get me wrong they were THE worst thing that has ever happened to this Club in it's 118 year existance, I fear the present incumbent of the "Hotseat", Mr Hodgson could surpass them & do more damage between now and the end of the season unless curbed than they did in just over three year's.

Nice picture of Jesus!

You're point is WHAT exactly? or would you feel better if i'd talked about Trans Warp Deflectors rather than pointing out the inevitability of this Club going down the Tube's with Hodgson in charge? ??

It's Funny my first thought was Jeezus as soon as i saw your reply, Forum Moderator's, you ............ kill me, you should be on the stage!

Sorry, it's me, You're being cryptic Bob, you're being a blind man in the hope that what you don't see as plain as the nose on yer face you won't believe.

What am i getting next a picture of Jesus with his hand's over his ear's cos what you don't hear won't harm you?

Or possibly a card for speaking out about our beloved Manager?

by **bigmick** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:11 pm

There's nothing wrong with "speaking out" about anything. When you make statements though which imply Roy Hodgson could do more damage to the club in one season than four years of Hicks and Gillette, it means one of three things. Either you are on a wind up, you are allowing your dislike of Roy Hodgson to cloud your judgement to a laughable extent, or you haven't got a clue. To be totally honest I don't really care which one it is, but my guess is that was what the face palm was for.

by **Igor Zidane** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:17 pm

bigmick wrote:There's nothing wrong with "speaking out" about anything. When you make statements though which imply Roy Hodgson could do more damage to the club in one season than four years of Hicks and Gillette, it means one of three things. Either you are on a wind up, you are allowing your dislike of Roy Hodgson to cloud your judgement to a laughable extent, or you haven't got a clue. To be totally honest I don't really care which one it is, but my guess is that was what the face palm was for.

Sorry to pull you up here Michael but you claimed that the previous manager was doing as much damage to LFC as hicks and gillett were . You couldn't even commit to wanting the yanks out before the manager . Whilst i totally disagree with what glenbuck said i totally disagreed with what you said at the time .

by **glenbuck patriot** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:36 pm

bigmick wrote:There's nothing wrong with "speaking out" about anything. When you make statements though which imply Roy Hodgson could do more damage to the club in one season than four years of Hicks and Gillette, it means one of three things. Either you are on a wind up, you are allowing your dislike of Roy Hodgson to cloud your judgement to a laughable extent, or you haven't got a clue. To be totally honest I don't really care which one it is, but my guess is that was what the face palm was for.

Read the post Mick in it's entirity not just the first paragraph, i think you'll find it's self explanatory..... if not let me paraphrase my statement for you,

H&G; Worst case scenario; Best Players Leave/Sold, we end up a mid-table mediocre team!

Hodgson; The way we are playing we will BE a Mid Table team by the end of the Season, the BEST/STAR Players will leave, does'nt matter how much money we get for them because:

1. Hodgson couldn't spot a Good Player at a Real Madrid/Barcelona Derby!

2. Even if Hodgson was gone no World Class Player's would sign for a Mid Table, Not in Europe Club unless thay were Mercenaries and NESV have already stated they are NOT the type of player we as Liverpool would be looking for.

So my final Sentence was about the fact that what we as Fan's had fought so much to avoid, ie Mid Table Mediocrity, was pretty much guarenteed under Hodgson.

Hence my Statement which probably in hindsight should have read he could do just AS MUCH DAMAGE........ symantic's ULTIMATE RESULT IS VERY SIMILAR!

As far as being a WUM, well read the post again properly, i'm far from a WUM pal, Do i dislike Hodgson, Yes, it's not clouding my thought's on the inevitibility of him staying in charge though, As far as not having a clue is concerned i've read your post's over the last few years on many occasion and even with as much drivel as you come out with, it never once crossed my mind to insult you, please show me the same courtesy!

Hope this clarifies thing's, if not come back to me and i'll have another go at making English sound English.

by **bigmick** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:44 pm

Fair enough, sorry you felt insulted. I was just trying to explain to you why Bob gave you the facepalm. hat doesn't mean I don't think you are talking b0ll0cks because I do, but we are all guilty of that sometimes i suppose. No offence meant anyway and sorry again.

by **glenbuck patriot** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:51 pm

bigmick wrote:Fair enough, sorry you felt insulted. I was just trying to explain to you why Bob gave you the facepalm. hat doesn't mean I don't think you are talking b0ll0cks because I do, but we are all guilty of that sometimes i suppose. No offence meant anyway and sorry again.

Well, that's a fair one, let's hope i am talking b0ll0ck's, Roy proves me wrong and going the match becomes enjoyable again........... then again i've just seen a pig fly across the Office window!

I'm on the fifth floor btw

by **Number 9** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:52 pm

bigmick wrote:Fair enough, sorry you felt insulted. I was just trying to explain to you why Bob gave you the facepalm. hat doesn't mean I don't think you are talking b0ll0cks because I do, but we are all guilty of that sometimes i suppose. No offence meant anyway and sorry again.

Let Bob give his own facepalm......you talk enough sh,ite on your own....way too much to be worrying about what others say Micky!
FFS in a space of a few weeks you are saying RH is the man,now you are trying to erm should I say "nail your flag to another mast"...............Full of sh'ite ya dopey big glipe!! :nod

by **bunglemark2** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:55 pm

Number 9 wrote:
bigmick wrote:Fair enough, sorry you felt insulted. I was just trying to explain to you why Bob gave you the facepalm. hat doesn't mean I don't think you are talking b0ll0cks because I do, but we are all guilty of that sometimes i suppose. No offence meant anyway and sorry again.

Let Bob give his own facepalm......you talk enough sh,ite on your own....way too much to be worrying about what others say Micky!
FFS in a space of a few weeks you are saying RH is the man,now you are trying to erm should I say "nail your flag to another mast"...............Full of sh'ite ya dopey big glipe!!

Don't be sittin' on the fence mate - you'll get piles !!

by **tubby** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:55 pm

Yeah Barry, tell us what you really think!

by **Reg** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:00 am

by **Number 9** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:04 am

bunglemark2 wrote:
Number 9 wrote:
bigmick wrote:Fair enough, sorry you felt insulted. I was just trying to explain to you why Bob gave you the facepalm. hat doesn't mean I don't think you are talking b0ll0cks because I do, but we are all guilty of that sometimes i suppose. No offence meant anyway and sorry again.

Let Bob give his own facepalm......you talk enough sh,ite on your own....way too much to be worrying about what others say Micky!
FFS in a space of a few weeks you are saying RH is the man,now you are trying to erm should I say "nail your flag to another mast"...............Full of sh'ite ya dopey big glipe!!

Don't be sittin' on the fence mate - you'll get piles !!

He just annoys me....sorry!
Biggest hypocrite on the board by a country mile,thinks he can say and do what he wants cause he has a tongue up Bobs @rse.Talks endless shi'te and chops and changes his opinions like the weather....constantly complains about people then at the same time can hardly put a sentence together without cr@pping all over our last manager.............just a fu'ckin @rsewipe!

Where is your'e Roy sig now Micky?......make us proud it said?Idiot!

by **Bad Bob** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:18 am

glenbuck patriot wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
glenbuck patriot wrote:As bad as Hick's & Gillette were & don't get me wrong they were THE worst thing that has ever happened to this Club in it's 118 year existance, I fear the present incumbent of the "Hotseat", Mr Hodgson could surpass them & do more damage between now and the end of the season unless curbed than they did in just over three year's.

Nice picture of Jesus!

You're point is WHAT exactly? or would you feel better if i'd talked about Trans Warp Deflectors rather than pointing out the inevitability of this Club going down the Tube's with Hodgson in charge? ??

It's Funny my first thought was Jeezus as soon as i saw your reply, Forum Moderator's, you ............ kill me, you should be on the stage!

After all of the sh!te we went through with the previous owners, you're seriously going to sit there and say that Hodgson's possibly going to do more damage by May? Seriously? I'll readily accept that he's out of his depth and needs replacing but there's no chance he's in the same stratosphere of destruction as those two cowboys.

by **Number 9** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:22 am

Card for Number 9 for telling the truth!

by **Reg** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:33 am

Thats a tough card, I'll grant you that Niner.

(NB: first time I have ever commented on a card.)

Liverpool FC Forum

ROY HODGSON - Official Thread

Who is online