Liverpool FC Forum

by **Igor Zidane** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:42 pm

Can't stand bamaganese though . Do they have a flag i could burn lash

by **Roger Red Hat** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:50 pm

In and Out wrote:Mods, I'd just like to say that this is a Liverpool forum right, I'm here defending the side and the manager and being hounded upon in years gone by that would of warranted in others getting carded, for not supporting the team and manager.

your wasting your time, just tell 'em to fuk off like I do and except the card coming your way.

edit: thats the poster that wind you up, dont tell the mods to fuk off ! :laugh:

by **Benny The Noon** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:52 pm

Anyway - looking at the team that is going out tonight with both Lucas and Poulsen not playing and going by what Hodgson saying about the set up being the same for both the Arsenal game and Birmingham game do we think he is going to stick with both Lucas and Poulsen for the Manc game and bring Cole in on the right ? Do people think that's what he is looking for during the games against the top clubs - two dms ? Or will he have notice how ineffective they were against Brum and give Merieles a start there or bring Gerrard back and move Cole to behind Torres

by **Ciggy** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:33 pm

In and Out wrote:Don't make this a gender thing, she gives as good as she gets, she's even good at getting other thrown off here.

Hang on a minute here Ive had no one feckin thrown off here. Dont be telling lies I never report or pm the Mods and they will tell you that themselves.

And yes I can give as good as I get but saying I get members banned is a lie.

by **bigmick** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:48 pm

Fecking hell. Anyway to come back to Benny's point which is the only football one for about four pages, I don't personally think the fact that neither Lucas nor Poulsen are playing tonight means it necessarily follows they will both play against the Mancs.

I actually think Roy will play Gerrard in central midfield alongside Poulsen, with Cole off Torres. This will mean Mereiles will be sub unless he has an absolute stormer tonight. I actually agree with that as well, in advance of him doing it. If he doesn't do that, then I think he will play Gerrard/Mereiles in central midfield, with Cole off Torres. The third option is Mereiles Poulsen in midfield, with Cole on the right.

I don't though think he will play Lucas thank God.

by **zarababe** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:51 pm

Well Roy looks extremely stressed - I don't think he realisd the enormity of the task.

by **Roger Red Hat** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:52 pm

If he doesn't play lucas and poulson and we play tonight and spank them with free flowing football and a fair few goals, do you think Roy will keep the same team against the mancs?

by **Benny The Noon** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:52 pm

I think he may play Lucas thou Mick due to his experience playing against them and winning and being more mobile - would rather neither play tbh and have gerrard and merieles in the middle

by **bigmick** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:01 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:I think he may play Lucas thou Mick due to his experience playing against them and winning and being more mobile - would rather neither play tbh and have gerrard and merieles in the middle

Lucas does have experience of winning against them, but he has an awful lot of experience of losing against them as well. I sincerely hope that Roy stops playing him, because he is a mile away from being good enough.

I vowed once Roy was made manager and that I knew I supported the decision, that while I would be pro Roy I wouldn't go to some of the ridiculous levels we have seen on here in the past (IMHO obviously). In short, I pledged to myself that I'd be pretty honest (save for the odd :buttrock

thrown in to wind Magus up).

So far, I wish we'd press the ball higher up, I'm unsure as of yet about Mereiles, and I cannot believe he is going to persist with the Lucas/anyone else axis.

In short if he plays Lucas against Man Utd when he has options to do other things, I will have no hesitation is saying it is a b0ll0cks decision.

by **Benny The Noon** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:32 pm

bigmick wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:I think he may play Lucas thou Mick due to his experience playing against them and winning and being more mobile - would rather neither play tbh and have gerrard and merieles in the middle

Lucas does have experience of winning against them, but he has an awful lot of experience of losing against them as well. I sincerely hope that Roy stops playing him, because he is a mile away from being good enough.

I vowed once Roy was made manager and that I knew I supported the decision, that while I would be pro Roy I wouldn't go to some of the ridiculous levels we have seen on here in the past (IMHO obviously). In short, I pledged to myself that I'd be pretty honest (save for the odd thrown in to wind Magus up).

So far, I wish we'd press the ball higher up, I'm unsure as of yet about Mereiles, and I cannot believe he is going to persist with the Lucas/anyone else axis.

In short if he plays Lucas against Man Utd when he has options to do other things, I will have no hesitation is saying it is a b0ll0cks decision.

I think Lucas has played against them 4 times and won 3 games out of the 4 . We cant go in against them with Poulsen in the middle - his lack of mobility would just get eaten alive at Old Trafford by Fletcher and Scholes in the middle .

by **bigmick** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:25 pm

Look we don't agree on Poulsen/Lucas, so there's little point in debating it. One things for sure, if you are right and Poulsen is only as good as Lucas, then neither of them are good enough. Lucas is absolutely gash lets be honest (I can't think why I've delayed saying it for so long, we might as well tell it like it is for once).

As far as Poulsen is concerned, you've said you don't like him and I've said I do. We've only seen him a couple of times, why not just give him a dozen matches or so before coming back to it. There's little point in continuously pointing out that you don't rate him, we know. At least the difference between him and Lucas is the fact that he has only played a couple of matches and therefore there could be improvement in him.

by **Benny The Noon** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:34 pm

bigmick wrote:Look we don't agree on Poulsen/Lucas, so there's little point in debating it. One things for sure, if you are right and Poulsen is only as good as Lucas, then neither of them are good enough. Lucas is absolutely gash lets be honest (I can't think why I've delayed saying it for so long, we might as well tell it like it is for once).

As far as Poulsen is concerned, you've said you don't like him and I've said I do. We've only seen him a couple of times, why not just give him a dozen matches or so before coming back to it. There's little point in continuously pointing out that you don't rate him, we know. At least the difference between him and Lucas is the fact that he has only played a couple of matches and therefore there could be improvement in him.

We will agree to disagree and revisit later .

by **Emerald Red** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:54 pm

In and Out wrote:Igor I'm not on a wind up and I don't post on Rawk it's full of Rafapologists not LFC supporters.

Is that so?

by **Roger Red Hat** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:01 pm

Benny The Noon wrote:We will agree to disagree and revisit later .

another of benny's favourite lines. wish i could count up the times you've used that line on here benny, starting to prove a point mate - you go against the grain most of the time just to rub people up

by **NANNY RED** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:52 pm

UN FU.CKING BELIEVABLE WHAT I HAVE BEEN READING THE LAST FEW PAGES .

Liverpool FC Forum

ROY HODGSON - Official Thread

Who is online