Liverpool FC Forum

by **lakes10** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:26 am

NANNY RED wrote:
neil wrote:I don't think city or spurs will finish in the top 4, the only reason tottenham are in the champs league(qualifiers) is because WE had our worst campaign in living memory, 19 defeats in total.

God we agree for once ,i dont think theyll finish in the top four either . Spurs and City that is,

I think City have a good chance of getting 2nd this season or even win it.

by **Thommo's perm** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:47 am

supersub wrote:
Ben Patrick wrote:By the way who has said he is a messiah ?

some WUM disguised as thommos perm

Where did I say he was the messiah?

As far as being a wum. Most people on here are wums either intentionally or not. Take he "woy" sh'it for example. I was wound up but now I just leave the daft tw@ts to it.
That is the nature of internet forums, and dare I say football in general. Everyones got an opinion whether theyre qualified to give it or not. Thats the joy of being a supporter and long may it continue.
Some people say its boring, but how boring would it be if we all agreed with each other?
:wwww

by **supersub** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:57 am

Thommo's perm wrote:
supersub wrote:
Ben Patrick wrote:By the way who has said he is a messiah ?

some WUM disguised as thommos perm

Where did I say he was the messiah?

As far as being a wum. Most people on here are wums either intentionally or not. Take he "woy" sh'it for example. I was wound up but now I just leave the daft tw@ts to it.
That is the nature of internet forums, and dare I say football in general. Everyones got an opinion whether theyre qualified to give it or not. Thats the joy of being a supporter and long may it continue.
Some people say its boring, but how boring would it be if we all agreed with each other?

Perhaps this isn't a tongue in cheek , wink of the eye, chuckle in your tea comment

Thommo's perm
LFC Advanced Member

Group: LFC Members
Posts: 273
Joined: June 2010 Posted: July 30 2010,09:25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote (Ciggy @ July 30 2010,07:00)
Before I start hailing him as a tactical genious like some, ill reserve my judgement for our first 5 opening league games.

Oh ye of little faith
Kneel and pray for forgiveness at doubting the new merseyiah

Back to top

by **mart** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:01 am

neil wrote:I don't think city or spurs will finish in the top 4, the only reason tottenham are in the champs league(qualifiers) is because WE had our worst campaign in living memory, 19 defeats in total.

Spurs probably not, but City will. Top 4 will probably be chelsea, city, manure and arsenal. I'm guessing we come in 5th before spurs and villa.

by **Thommo's perm** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:04 am

Supersub

Its a joke
:;):

For all those miserable ba'stards who are saying that Red Roy is not up to the job. Were "being realistic" they say. Funny, thats what I say when I want to be negative.
Maybe people should lighten up a bit? Rafas gone and a new dawn is here.
The king is dead, long live the king!

by **anti-hero** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:44 pm

i had to put this up.

by **NANNY RED** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:09 pm

HA HA practicing his moves ,hes heard about THE Grafton, :laugh:

by **jimmy brighton** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:15 pm

"what the

was he eating last night!"

by **ruskiy playmaker** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:01 am

lakes10 wrote:
NANNY RED wrote:
neil wrote:I don't think city or spurs will finish in the top 4, the only reason tottenham are in the champs league(qualifiers) is because WE had our worst campaign in living memory, 19 defeats in total.

God we agree for once ,i dont think theyll finish in the top four either . Spurs and City that is,

I think City have a good chance of getting 2nd this season or even win it.

They will need a :censored:

miracle to win it. They had a huge overhaul of the sq. They'll probably start off good, but will burn out towards the end of the season.

by **burjennio** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:10 am

Obviously our Roy is paying homage to his favourite WWE wrestler of all time, Booker T

by **Reg** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:58 am

jimmy brighton wrote:"what the was he eating last night!"

by **Owzat** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:21 am

Thommo's perm wrote:As far as being a wum. Most people on here are wums either intentionally or not. Take he "woy" sh'it for example. I was wound up but now I just leave the daft tw@ts to it.

You got "wound up" because someone calls Woy "Woy", and then call other people "daft tw@ts".........................

I R O N Y

Can't call him Roy, we've had a manager Roy (Evans) and Woy suits the new manager. Is it intended as an insult or in some way a p1s stake or slur on him? No, not really or I'd be doing more than just calling him Woy. It may even turn into an affectionate 'nickname', just because you're hurling toys out your pram because you don't like it and aren't as mature as you'd like to think you are so can't ignore it or stop name calling other people who do it, then that's your problem.

A thread was created and so many threw their toys out of their prams, nuff said

by **Owzat** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:41 am

ruskiy playmaker wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
NANNY RED wrote:
neil wrote:I don't think city or spurs will finish in the top 4, the only reason tottenham are in the champs league(qualifiers) is because WE had our worst campaign in living memory, 19 defeats in total.

God we agree for once ,i dont think theyll finish in the top four either . Spurs and City that is,

I think City have a good chance of getting 2nd this season or even win it.

They will need a miracle to win it. They had a huge overhaul of the sq. They'll probably start off good, but will burn out towards the end of the season.

ruskiy doll! ruskiy doll!

Agree re Citeh, a group of better than average players does not constitute a team. It might work on a footy management game, but in reality Chelsea and the scum will have the upper hand as they have some top quality players and a TEAM. Citeh may gain an advantage in depth of squad, but last season they won just EIGHTEEN games and to win the league you need 27+ as I've said before. That's a feck of a big leap, to win 50% more games than you did in the previous season.

re their prospects of finishing fourth, I think they will be there with the usual suspects. We had a "shocking season" and yet won the same number of games as Citeh, says it all.

As for spudz, I think they need to wake up to the fact that they need quality CBs who can stay fit and play 38 games a season. They won't win the league while King, Dawson and Woodgate are their best CBs. They lost 10 league games last season, we had a "shocking season" and lost 11............................................

Difference between the top two and the rest is the top two a) can and have won 27+ games a season, both did last season, and b) don't draw or lose too many games. spudz may have overcome one or two demons last season, but they are still vulnerable against the top sides and some of the not so top sides. They've made that psychological step up into the top four for the first time, doesn't make them title contenders.

The record that no team has finished below 3rd in the Premiership and won the title the following season still stands, Chelsea did manage to make that exact leap from 3rd to Champions but noone since Leeds in 1991/92 has gone from 4th to Champions.

Blackburn : 4th in 92/93, 2nd in 93/94, Champions in 94/95
Chelsea : 4th in 02/03, 2nd in 03/04, Champions in 04/05

Arsenal : 3rd in 96/97, Champions in 97/98
Chelsea : 3rd in 08/09, Champions in 09/10
Man Utd : 3rd in 01/02, Champions in 02/03

Just picked out the three instances of a side going from 3rd to Champions, and Blackburn and Chelsea's first titles in the Premiership, only in the case of Blackburn, in case anyone thought that they "bought" the title and rose meteorically to the top.

by **daveyw** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:25 am

http://www.insideliverpool.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=961:liverpool-fc-manager-roy-hodgson-targets-steven-defour-and-christian-poulson-&catid=77:liverpool-fc&Itemid=54

see who liverpool are trying to buy found this this morning what do you think

any truth in this

by **Thommo's perm** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:12 pm

Owzat wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:As far as being a wum. Most people on here are wums either intentionally or not. Take he "woy" sh'it for example. I was wound up but now I just leave the daft tw@ts to it.

You got "wound up" because someone calls Woy "Woy", and then call other people "daft tw@ts".........................

I R O N Y

Can't call him Roy, we've had a manager Roy (Evans) and Woy suits the new manager. Is it intended as an insult or in some way a p1s stake or slur on him? No, not really or I'd be doing more than just calling him Woy. It may even turn into an affectionate 'nickname', just because you're hurling toys out your pram because you don't like it and aren't as mature as you'd like to think you are so can't ignore it or stop name calling other people who do it, then that's your problem.

A thread was created and so many threw their toys out of their prams, nuff said

Ah I get it now
Its a term of endearment
See where I come from, mocking someone who has a speech impediment is not a sign of affection. And we call people who try to justify it as such, "daft tw@ts"
As far as "hurling toys out of my pram", my pram is full of cuddly, fluffy toys and I wouldnt part with any of them thank you very much.
Oh, and by the way I dont have a "problem"

Liverpool FC Forum

ROY HODGSON - Official Thread

Who is online