bavlondon wrote:That's becasue Keane was previously proven in this country. How can you compare him with Voronin?
There is a reason Voronin was free. He is and shouldn't play here. Sorry if it seems I am not giving him a chance but I don't want any more half baked players here if it can be helped.
Easy, the same way I can compare one striker with another - Keane with Torres, Keane with Bellamy, Torres with Bellamy etc. Torres was not "previously proven in this country", we bought him and he proved his worth. I don't doubt Keane is a better striker than Voronin, but I only account for their time in LIVERPOOL shirts and during that time Voronin did as much as Keane on the pitch where it matters.
I suggest you're not the only one who could be accused of hypocrisy, a lot on here are happy to give some a chance and others no chance. I'm not suggesting Voronin deserves a place in the starting line-up week in, week out, but he certainly did enough to deserve a bit more of a chance than one season - especially as he cost nothing.
People bleat on about Keane not getting fair treatment, especially when he scored three in two games. Keane played three more times for us, Voronin scored in his last competitive appearance for Liverpool and was shipped out on loan. He came back from months out injured as he mentioned, scored twice in his last seven appearances of which four were subs appearances of between six and sixteen minutes.
With Rafa's track record re strikers you wonder if there's any point signing any more, Crouch scored three in his last four appearances for Liverpool and Keane is yet another striker not given enough time to prove himself - Fowler (1.5), Bellamy (1), Keane (0.5), Voronin (1), Morientes (1.5)