by bigmick » Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:09 am
In fairness if I was arguing as a pro-rotationer, I would come on and say that many of the changes have been in the Champions League, which have then been reverted back to type for Premiership matches. This probably makes the stat look worse. I would also argue that as many people are imploring Rafa to "go for the league" then surely resting players in Europe is exactly what they want? No doubt somebody will come up with the injuries, the so-called "forced rotations" as well (though I must confess I was quite happy when they were referred to as just injuries but that's probably just me). The old "had Alonso and Agger been fit then we wouldn't have had to make so may changes" chestnut.
Some of it has validity, some it doesn't. In fairness, if you don't accept that changing the team has any discernable effect on how the team plays, it's all pretty irrelevent anyway. Given that premise, we might as well change eight every game rather than six as it makes no odds anyhow.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".