bavlondon wrote:Change your font ffs mate.
Im with Metalhead on this one. Yeah yeah so he is lucky enough to wear the red shirt. He has put in enough poor performances to warrant this slagging off. He isnt being slated for no reason. He was being skinned all over the place the other day. No way in hell is he good enough to play for Liverpool. Whether he can step up and improve who knows time will tell but he will get a chance whilst Aurelio is injured.
Owzat wrote:GYBS wrote:Bridge is pretty good - very solid defensively and pretty decent going forward - always rated him and think would be very good for us but can never see chelsea selling him to us .
I have to say Bridge isn't "shit", I rate him higher than cashley who gallops forward with no great effect and looks dodgy at times defensively for such an expensive full-back. For one season and maybe a bit, Arsenal had the better of that 'cash plus player' deal. It looks like Gallas is a bad loser though, not that Chelsea's lack of trophies hasn't coincided with the arrival of cashley...................
But I couldn't see Chelsea selling us Bridge. If Aurelio could tighten up his game defensively then would we be having a discussion on LB?
Suggestions on Lahm I do like as well, one of the players I always look to sign on a footy management game. Also try to get Johnson and Clichy, young enough to improve and have a few years left in them.
Alex G. wrote:It´s official, Insua is FAR better than Dossena. Thank God we have a decent substitute for Aurelio!
Toffeehater wrote:Alex G. wrote:It´s official, Insua is FAR better than Dossena. Thank God we have a decent substitute for Aurelio!
, dossena is still better than him , but he has not done justice to that with his performances . if he does not perform by January it will be a good time to sell him back and get a replacement , ala bridge as aurelio is too injury prone .
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 56 guests
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.