ROY HODGSON - Official Thread

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Penguins » Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:50 pm

maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Penguins wrote:Oh my, so not even Cole was his signing.

But Poulsen and Konschesky he is proud to announce he wasted 10 million on....
2 Fulham players that have signed for Liverpool  :no

We won't get back 5 of those 10....

Poulson was from Juventus mate.
Konchesky was the only Fulham signing.

No, I didn't write wrong.

Poulsen is a "Fulham" player....
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

Postby Igor Zidane » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:52 pm

devaney wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:
LFC2007 wrote:When someone posted up an article claiming that Purslow had given Roy a list of players he would get rid of, some people took it to be completely believable (aha! he's been interfering! didn't we tell you), so why is it any less believable that he "initiated" the Cole signing? Pretty much all throughout the summer people on here were telling us that Purslow was conducting our transfer business.  ???

Cole was a purslow signing . Hodgson had no choice in the matter it was sorted before he was manager .

As for hodgson slagging cole in the press , not right atall . By all means tear him to pieces in private but not in the press.

Maybe so but Hodgson milked the signing for all it was worth and certainly gave the impression to the media that he was heavily involved in the transfer, as initially it looked like the sort of signing that contributed towards keeping Gerrard and Torres at Liverpool. Personally I didn't believe that as no acceptable offers had come forward for either player. And now because he is on skid row he is looking for any excuses he can find and that includes the totally unacceptable condemnation of players via the media.

I am at the end of my tether with Hodgson but I make no apologies for not joining in the childish abuse which frankly doesn't make us a lot better than him! THE SOONER HE GOES THE BETTER. Honestly couldn't see Sammy Lee doing a worse job as a temporary replacement. Hodgson if he wasn't before is becoming a very serious embarrassment and that must not be allowed to continue given that he is the public face of LFC.

Agreed and good post .
UP THE PURPS !!!
Image
https://www.colfc.co.uk/
Igor Zidane
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7796
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Thommo's perm » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:52 pm

Penguins wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Penguins wrote:Oh my, so not even Cole was his signing.

But Poulsen and Konschesky he is proud to announce he wasted 10 million on....
2 Fulham players that have signed for Liverpool  :no

We won't get back 5 of those 10....

Poulson was from Juventus mate.
Konchesky was the only Fulham signing.

No, I didn't write wrong.

Poulsen is a "Fulham" player....

Poulsen is the new Lucas...
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

Postby Igor Zidane » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:55 pm

Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.
UP THE PURPS !!!
Image
https://www.colfc.co.uk/
Igor Zidane
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7796
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby Thommo's perm » Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:08 pm

Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

Postby LFC2007 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:15 pm

Can't agree with the anaylsis of the Cole comments. Ideally he would have sent a more inclusive and upbeat message as that we're all in this together, but to say that Roy "slagged him off" or that he "condemned" Cole implies something much stronger than his comments actually suggest.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Thommo's perm » Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:24 pm

LFC2007 wrote:Can't agree with the anaylsis of the Cole comments. Ideally he would have sent a more inclusive and upbeat message as that we're all in this together, but to say that Roy "slagged him off" or that he "condemned" Cole implies something much stronger than his comments actually suggest.

Its interpretation. What matters is how Cole responds
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

Postby kazza » Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:47 pm

Thommo's perm wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along

Lucas was young and was improving. Poulsen is as good as he will ever be.
User avatar
kazza
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6945
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Spread thin

Postby Penguins » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:15 pm

Thommo's perm wrote:
Penguins wrote:
maypaxvobiscum wrote:
Penguins wrote:Oh my, so not even Cole was his signing.

But Poulsen and Konschesky he is proud to announce he wasted 10 million on....
2 Fulham players that have signed for Liverpool  :no

We won't get back 5 of those 10....

Poulson was from Juventus mate.
Konchesky was the only Fulham signing.

No, I didn't write wrong.

Poulsen is a "Fulham" player....

Poulsen is the new Lucas...

No, since there is **** all chance Poulsen will be any better than what we are seeing now.

Which is the reason why Rafa made us profits on players.
We can sell Lucas at a profit while Poulsen is the new Diao who will sit out his contract as noone wants him cause he is ****.
Penguins
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:25 am

Postby Ben Patrick » Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:52 pm

pousen isnt likely to come good.
He is already past 30 and is on the way down.
Lucas struggled for a long time but looks to be getting more confident and better with every game.
I wouldnt think there is even a comparison at the moment. The good thing is Roy appears to think the same if you look at his selections.
Sabre looks like a big lezzer
User avatar
Ben Patrick
 
Posts: 3933
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:47 pm
Location: Liverpool

Postby boodiddy1 » Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:00 pm

Penguins wrote:Which is the reason why Rafa made us profits on players.
We can sell Lucas at a profit while Poulsen is the new Diao who will sit out his contract as noone wants him cause he is ****.

Rafa made us profit on Players?? Morientes 2m loss, Keane, 6m loss. Aquilanni 6m loss, Babel? Unknown. Garcia 3m loss. Riera 4m loss.

Se my point?

Too many looking through rose tinted glasses about Rafa's time here. He made many mistakes in the transfer market, but as rafa always did, always will do, he will blame the owners, tea lady, table manufacturers etc.

Konchesky isnt really that bad, he's just  asteady eddy. 4.5m gets you that these days. Poulsen= a dud. Def money lost. Raul? Well, im delighted to have him here.

So, there you go. Good and bad from both. Cole??? Personally I think he's past his best. A career that looks good on paper, but ultimately, the lad has looked in from the outside. Should of been a world beater with the talent he had.
Image
User avatar
boodiddy1
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: bolton

Postby metalhead » Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:57 am

kazza wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along

Lucas was young and was improving. Poulsen is as good as he will ever be.

Poulsen was a top player at his prime, unfortunately age is catching up with him.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Emerald Red » Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:32 am

metalhead wrote:
kazza wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along

Lucas was young and was improving. Poulsen is as good as he will ever be.

Poulsen was a top player at his prime, unfortunately age is catching up with him.

He's only 30, you know. He's hardly middle-aged and got joint problems.
Image
User avatar
Emerald Red
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7289
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby metalhead » Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:31 am

Emerald Red wrote:
metalhead wrote:
kazza wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along

Lucas was young and was improving. Poulsen is as good as he will ever be.

Poulsen was a top player at his prime, unfortunately age is catching up with him.

He's only 30, you know. He's hardly middle-aged and got joint problems.

Morientes was a top player, but he was garbage with us.

He also joined us when he is 29.

Most top players at that age who have never played in the English league before struggle when they join a top English side.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Thommo's perm » Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:20 pm

kazza wrote:
Thommo's perm wrote:
Igor Zidane wrote:Lucas is the new lucas , poulsen is dogsh1t.

So was Lucas before Poulsen came along

Lucas was young and was improving. Poulsen is as good as he will ever be.

I use the comparison because Poulsen seems to be unable to pass to his team mates or stamp any authority on the game, much like Lucas. Lucas has improved only because he makes less mistakes, but I challenge anybody to tell me, out of his 143 appearances, 5 games where Lucas has been outstanding.
User avatar
Thommo's perm
 
Posts: 6383
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:57 am
Location: liverpool

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 55 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e