Igor Zidane wrote:Ben Patrick wrote:yes 100%
I would just have not employed Roy.
This is the part that i think divides us all most.
Do you think if we hadnt brought in Roy that Rafa should still be here ?
You see the two things are totally seperate decisions.
I am not sure what managers you rate but if we could have tempted one of them instead of Roy would you still want Rafa ahead of this other person as well ?
What i did say ben at the time and you can look back on the threads is this . If we sack rafa there is not a chance in a million years that a world class manager will come anywhere near us with the owners we have . I was right , because it was glareingly obvious. Now if we had employed a hiddink or a mourinho or someone of that calibre we would not be having the flame wars we have now . We would have seen that the board were sacking benitez (as much as we hated it ) for the right reasons. .To get someone better in , to progress to take the next step or whatever . We would be united behind and ambitious manager with top class credentials and even if we were in the position we are in now we still would have backed him and given him time (as we do ).
We could see though that it would be disasterous to sack rafa as no one else wanted the job . Accept a 64year old nobody who thought all his christmas's had come at once . LMA manager of the year and all that . Friggin george burley won that .
right ok, without getting all hot under the collar, it is infact your opinion that nobody else wanted it.
They may have never been asked. The owners and purslow who were obviously not anywhere near qualified enough to make the call chose Roy, he might have been the man they wanted from the start.
Who knows.
But to answer your question, i still would have wanted Rafa to go. Roy will go at some point and we need someone new with fresh ideas etc.
Rafa would have been difficult to get rid of for new owners due to the way the fans are with him, that could have met he stayed another season or two too long.








