kazza wrote:So now you have finally come out of the closet Mick, does that mean that all we can expect from you is flaming anti Raffa rhetoric?Deary me

kazza wrote:So now you have finally come out of the closet Mick, does that mean that all we can expect from you is flaming anti Raffa rhetoric?Deary me
boodawn wrote:As a paddy I try to follow the Irish players in the premiership. I'm not an out and out Liverpool fan but I love the city and the people of Liv. I've always admired the way the club approached the game of football, on and off the field. In regards to Robbie Keane, I don't understand how you can bench a player, who will run himself and defenders ragged. If you don't have heart you are cheating the fans. I think Torres and Benitez conspired to keep him out. He must be gutted at what has happened.
supersub wrote:heimdall wrote:NANNY RED wrote:heimdall wrote:Did we go backwards when Rafa became manager? answer the question please??
Now your just being a soft lad. Why do you think he has
Nanny, I'm just trying to get GYBS to admit that we wouldn't necessarily have to go on a massive 5 year rebuilding plan if we got a new manager.
And your new manager is???
Judge wrote:supersub wrote:heimdall wrote:NANNY RED wrote:heimdall wrote:Did we go backwards when Rafa became manager? answer the question please??
Now your just being a soft lad. Why do you think he has
Nanny, I'm just trying to get GYBS to admit that we wouldn't necessarily have to go on a massive 5 year rebuilding plan if we got a new manager.
And your new manager is???
Mourinho
![]()
Judge wrote:it was a tongue in cheek quote GYBS, you thick yank
access wrote:Hi as a newbie I had to join the debate about the Keane affair this has caused a huge amount of interest.
During the 2007 season because of my job I occasionally got complimentary tickets for a number of Premier matches and on 3 occasions saw Robbie Keane in action and actually rated him working behind Berbatov ... and when we signed him I actually could see a postive role for Robbie working behind Torres and was fairly excited of the new prospect.
But we could argue all day on this forum about 'what went on' and 'why' he wasnt played and didnt get a good run out.
My two concerns are not really record science 'could' he have made an impact IF he was used correctly in that position behind Torres? thats down to the manager he picks the team no-one else .... was Rafa at fault there?
my second concern and this is being picked up by many a supporter and the press ... what IF god forbid - Torres gets injured again what are are real options?
I am sure we can 'do it' this season, I dare not mention the word only for fear of it not working out.
Thanks
Redman in wales wrote:destro wrote:Why do we keep mentioning this 20 Million figure, there have been numerous articles posted saying we had only paid 9 Million of it, we sold him back for 12 Million so we made 3 Million. If thats true, apart from the fact we are a bit short up front now then thats a good piece of business ?
i dont think it'll work like that somehow.
it was £20.3 million including add-ons based on appearances, goals etc.
The actual fee was more like £18m - of which we've apparently paid £9m... with £9m of the fee yet to be paid.
Spurs bid of £12 (plus add-ons) is more than likely to include (imo) the £9m that we still owe them + £3m cash
So, the £9m is wiped from both payments. We've paid them £9m, they've paid us £3m.
A loss of £6m .... (though there will be more money coming in with add-ons depending on appearances, goals, and that sort of thing)
essentially its cost us £6m to have robbie keane on loan for 6 months
Ciggy wrote:A Spurs fan said yesterday just feckin great Keane & berbatov where like a ham & cheese sandwitch, now we have just the ham and no cheese its a terrible decision from spurs.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 89 guests