
http://wc2006.telegraph.co.uk/Documen....05F5F9D
Gerrard plays well for his club because of the quality foreign players around him? What a joke that is. He's widely recognised as one of the finest strikers of a ball, passing or shooting, in Europe. In terms of his technique, he's simply one of the best around, surgically precise. He's got great vision, strength which he uses to good effect with those surging runs through the opposition and good positional awareness. He scored over twenty goals last season playing predominantly off the right of midfield, then after almost twelve months of non-stop football went to the World Cup and scored one with his head and one with his left peg. But he's not "world class"?
What more do you want him to do, whistle Dixie and sh#t sixpences?

Other than that, the article isn't too bad in that it at least attempted to offer some sort of explanation (beyond managerial short-comings) as to why England continue to falter.
I also don't quite understand the love-in with Wenger. He gets a generous press IMO. Last year they scraped fourth by the skin of their teeth. And over the years he has bought some terrible players. All managers have a mixed record in the market, but Wenger's mistakes don't seem to be remembered by the journalists.
My final thought on England is that I can't help but think we would have had a great chance to win this World Cup with someone like a Venables preparing the team and tactics. Lennon on the right, Hargreaves holding, Gerrard rampaging, Crouch playing and allowing Rooney to get the ball facing goal.
When will this clowns in the press stop basing their judgements of players on World Cup tournaments? Judging on this World Cup, Ronaldinho would be distinctly average ffs.