Bam wrote:You're right, I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for the colonialists but that doesn't mean that how they went about things was right. I and many others (including your good self) have benefited from their actions but at great human cost. I find it important not to lose sight of that fact. 
Equally, its not always one way traffic and negative impacts that the Colonialist had in History. I'm bored to death of hearing how the Brits, Spanish, Portuguese and a few other European nations caused such inhumane acts in times gone by. I'm not just fed up with you, but the general attitude towards colonialists in general. I wouldnt expect you're good self to be constantly reminded and told how bad you're European ancestors were in those days, as you're not European.
In certain parts of the World Bob people have lost sight of the good the Colonialists brought to certain shores.
I'm sure you would of heard of the 'Stolen Generation' here in Australia. It has been Dispised by many from around the World looking in, and no doubt at the time it was morally wrong for the British to take young Aboriginals away from their families. It was wrong, but I actually know an Aboriginal woman who was one of these 'Stolen persons. She works in a bank, was brought up with Love and Education, she Loves her White parents like they were her own. She visited the site, r the village she was taken from in the outback somewhere and told me ....... " I'm glad I dont live here, I consider myself lucky and I'm glad I was brought up in a family who loved and educated me. I couldnt live here" she said.
Now while there are many Aboriginals who still resent what happened back then (which is fair enough) many also appreciated the missionaries from London Church and things like that, which people often leave out. The image of painting the Colonialists as tyrants and dictators (which they were in many cases) always seems to lose sight of the good they did to.[/quote]
Fair enough, Bam--it wasn't all negative and circumstances very from place to place and across time periods. In Eastern Canada, for instance, native peoples were treated with a certain amount of respect by both French and British administrators and settlers, and the British Crown insisted on signing formal treaties to acquire their lands. In British Columbia (west coast of Canada), on the other hand, the British settlers decided not to engage in a formal treaty process and simply herded natives onto reserves through coercion or threat of force. The result? Largely peaceful relations between natives and whites in Eastern Canada and a series of native protests and lawsuits in BC, which has severely come back to bite them in the a.rse once the Canadian Supreme Court determined that the natives very much had a case. A bit of a ramble but a point to say that things worked out differently in different parts of the empire and that not all exchanges were bad. My beef is only with those who won't acknowledge that any harm was caused by colonialism or who insist that it was all rather unfortunate (it was) but was nonetheless unavoidable (it was not). BTW, I may not be European but I'm of European ancestry (Scottish, Irish and Swiss-German) and that means that, when the native vs. white debate gets revved up in Canada, I'm one of the ones with the bad ancestors, just like you. 