Thommo's perm » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:36 pm wrote:Im not slagging FSG off, bashing them or "battering them on the head". I think theyve done well and their record speaks for itself.
However, spare me the bullsh'it about "viable" and "cost". I have been led to believe that the premier league has had billions pumped in by sky, so whats the problem? Because FSG want to make a profit? Are they saying they wont make a profit with increased capacity?
Total bo'llocks!
Thommo you say: "We either need to increase capacity or we dont?
Stop the bullsh'it about cost and supporters moaning about ticket prices! Get your hands in your pockets and do whats best for the club!!"
Well if that isn't bashing the owners then I don't know what is !!! They invest £150m in the most incredible new stand and you tell them to get their hands in their pockets

It is not simply a case of making a profit. It is also about profit margins. What is the point of spending a substantial amount of money on Anfield Road if the end result is to simply reduce FSG's profit levels. As I said before they are not a registered charity. Devaluing the club through poor investment is not in the interest of anybody. H & G took us to the brink of doom with the way they ran the club. Personally I do not want another repeat of that utterly embarrassing saga ever again !!