devaney » Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:22 am wrote:laza » Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:56 am wrote:There is no denying his talent but if he goes I not going to feel same despair as when Torres or Owen left.
We get a good price for him and continue to build a cohesive team unit rather rely on mercurial star player we probably will better off in long run
I just want it sorted one way or other
Why did you feel despair when we sold Torres? £50m for a player that had become a disruptive influence, as recently confirmed by Jamie Carragher,was excellent business in my opinion. Nando had thrown his dummy out for reasons best known to himself and was never the same player after he returned from injury.His record at Chelsea has been poor to say the least. Chelseaa would be very lucky if they could sell him for between £15m and £20m. Chelsea have also paid him over £25m in wages since he joined. What Chelsea have lost on Torres makes Carroll look like a good deal by comparison.
Michael Owen is a mercenary but so are the majority of top class footballers. Can you actually blame them? Would you behave differently if you were in their position? I very much doubt it. Easy to say that we would behave impeccably but I'm afraid money normally has the loudest voice.Liverpool fkd up financially with Owen and McManamon and it is unrealistic to blame the players.Suarez has signed a contract and if he is sold we will reap the rewards.In his first full season Suarez struggled to hit the proverbial horses ar.se with a banjo.If we keep him will he go back to that or have another brilliant season.It's all a bit of a gamble with no guarantees.The only thing for certain is that Luis will do something fkg stupid again before he hangs up his boots!
I don't think Torres deal was that bad for Chelsea. What did they win after he joined? Only the Cl and the EL with him playing a part in both. A really nice "consolation" I'd say. What did we get?
Caroll who scored what 3-5 goals his only season then to be loaned out the next. I'd say Chelski are way happier.