Liverpool FC Forum

by **Gerrard30391** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:04 am

bavlondon wrote:
Gerrard30391 wrote:
bavlondon wrote:
Gerrard30391 wrote:Is our place in the top four under threat until the yanks leave?

I cannot see any other way we will improve until they have left.

What? You dont agree with me? Sorry but thats just the way i see it.

No, i agree, just makes me angry the way a takeover can happen just like that and we need one and cant get one for months!!!

by **112-1077774096** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:07 am

bavlondon wrote:Anyone seeing SSN? Man City have just been bought by some group from Abu Dhabi. According to the Anil Bhorul (talking now), they have as much money as Cheslea x 10.

DIC need to get a move on quick.

its not saudi mate, its UAE. abu dhabi is the next main city to dubai in UAE.

no real loss to us to be honest, the money comes from a fund and therefore the main aim is to make a profit so dont expect a chelsea situation

by **Ciggy** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:08 am

lakes10 wrote:Shame DIC dont have the same money as ABDUG

The ruler of Dubia is richer than these.

DIC will not be buying us but Shiekh Mo himself.

by **lakes10** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:11 am

Ciggy wrote:
lakes10 wrote:Shame DIC dont have the same money as ABDUG

The ruler of Dubia is richer than these.

DIC will not be buying us but Shiekh Mo himself.

This is a part of the Royal .

by **Gerrard30391** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:34 pm

Seriously, the premierleague better look out, there already splashing cash.

A bid understood to be in excess of 30mil has been tabled for Berbatov less than 12 hours into there ownership:O

by **RUSHIE#9** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:38 pm

It makes you sick that we didn't go with good ol' Thaksin doesn't it? :lookaround

by **Ciggy** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:24 pm

Berbatov is having a medical at City 30 million hes costing them.

by **Gerrard30391** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:25 pm

'cause they can!!!!!!!!

The quicker DIC arrive the better for us!

by **dawson99** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:51 am

this is seriously bad for football in general. Looking at how abu dhabi (sp) do things, this is just gonna stupid. according to sources if they had had time they would have put in bids for torres, villa, ronaldo, fabregas et all spending hundreds of millions.

Apparently when they asked around to see how much had been spent at chelsea and were told 500 million they just said 'is that all'

the fact is that 500 million is absolutely nothing to these people, and that can only be bad for everyone in football around the world!!

by **Ciggy** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:34 am

Oh wonderfull They have just said their top targets in january are Torres 120 million.

Fabregas & ronaldo.

by **account deleted by request** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:50 am

dawson99 wrote:this is seriously bad for football in general. Looking at how abu dhabi (sp) do things, this is just gonna stupid. according to sources if they had had time they would have put in bids for torres, villa, ronaldo, fabregas et all spending hundreds of millions.

Apparently when they asked around to see how much had been spent at chelsea and were told 500 million they just said 'is that all'

the fact is that 500 million is absolutely nothing to these people, and that can only be bad for everyone in football around the world!!

Yeah mate, I guess we were just lucky that we got Hicks and Gillett

by **Gerrard30391** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:19 am

Just reading the papers and this guy looked into buying Liverpool, Arsenal, Newcastle and Man City and chose the latter!!!

by **JamCar05** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:27 am

Gerrard30391 wrote:Just reading the papers and this guy looked into buying Liverpool, Arsenal, Newcastle and Man City and chose the latter!!!

They were probably the cheaper option to play real life footy manager with.

by **shakey** » Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:23 pm

Just think that with the Two old gits from the muppet show being our owners...that come next summer we will be lucky if we are still a top 4 club :no

how can we compete with the investment they are going to get :veryangry

by **laza** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 5:58 am

dawson99 wrote:this is seriously bad for football in general. Looking at how abu dhabi (sp) do things, this is just gonna stupid. according to sources if they had had time they would have put in bids for torres, villa, ronaldo, fabregas et all spending hundreds of millions.

Apparently when they asked around to see how much had been spent at chelsea and were told 500 million they just said 'is that all'

the fact is that 500 million is absolutely nothing to these people, and that can only be bad for everyone in football around the world!!

Couldnt agree more

This sort of silly money thats being pumped into football clubs isnt sustainable in the long run

For average fan who wants to see his or team gaining success in the short term you cant begrudge the excitement of this sort of takeover.

Sometime in the future though it will end in tears

Liverpool FC Forum

Man city bought by saudi investment company - Yanks out

Who is online