Liverpool FC Forum

by **Iamheretoplease** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:42 pm

andy_g wrote:everton wanted fowler and tried to get him off man city. pearce didn't really want to let him go and told everton to stuff it. when liverpool made serious enquiries pearce decided that not allowing fowler to fulfill his dream return would be bad for man city and bad for fowler so he let him go. simple as that.

nice spin.

everton rejected fowler.

by **Lando_Griffin** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:50 pm

Iamheretoplease wrote:
andy_g wrote:everton wanted fowler and tried to get him off man city. pearce didn't really want to let him go and told everton to stuff it. when liverpool made serious enquiries pearce decided that not allowing fowler to fulfill his dream return would be bad for man city and bad for fowler so he let him go. simple as that.

nice spin.

everton rejected fowler.

Just like your Mother rejected you, leaving you to be raised in the wild by a Tribe of Elder Poofters.

That's how you came to support Neverton. :eyebrow

by **stoney** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:50 pm

Why are you lot bothering with this idiot. He was the same guy who was starting threads chatting :censored:

last time

by **dawson99** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:53 pm

Lando_Griffin wrote:
Iamheretoplease wrote:
andy_g wrote:everton wanted fowler and tried to get him off man city. pearce didn't really want to let him go and told everton to stuff it. when liverpool made serious enquiries pearce decided that not allowing fowler to fulfill his dream return would be bad for man city and bad for fowler so he let him go. simple as that.

nice spin.

everton rejected fowler.

Just like your Mother rejected you, leaving you to be raised in the wild by a Tribe of Elder Poofters.

That's how you came to support Neverton.

landos harsh.

harsh, but fair :wwww

by **Ciggy** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:56 pm

Iamheretoplease wrote:
andy_g wrote:everton wanted fowler and tried to get him off man city. pearce didn't really want to let him go and told everton to stuff it. when liverpool made serious enquiries pearce decided that not allowing fowler to fulfill his dream return would be bad for man city and bad for fowler so he let him go. simple as that.

nice spin.

everton rejected fowler.

This is true it was on Sky Sports Pearce turned Moyes down in other words when Pearce said Gollums interested in you, Robbie said stick two forks in my eyes. Plus Robbie said in his book he would never ever play for the BS.

by **JC_81** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:58 pm

Lando_Griffin wrote:
Iamheretoplease wrote:
andy_g wrote:everton wanted fowler and tried to get him off man city. pearce didn't really want to let him go and told everton to stuff it. when liverpool made serious enquiries pearce decided that not allowing fowler to fulfill his dream return would be bad for man city and bad for fowler so he let him go. simple as that.

nice spin.

everton rejected fowler.

Just like your Mother rejected you, leaving you to be raised in the wild by a Tribe of Elder Poofters.

That's how you came to support Neverton.

by **RedWolf35** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:18 pm

Hey

Let's see where Gravesen ends up when he leaves Real

Bet its not back to Gollum's Gudgeons (a gudgeon is a fish that feeds on the bottom of the pond, rather like your league position and transfer policy)

Loser

:grinning:

by **mikopool** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:20 pm

RedWolf35 wrote:Hey

Let's see where Gravesen ends up when he leaves Real

Bet its not back to Gollum's Gudgeons (a gudgeon is a fish that feeds on the bottom of the pond, rather like your league position and transfer policy)

Loser

by **mighty mo** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:38 pm

i bet fowler turned the bitters down and to show face they are claiming they turned fowler down,fowler would never sign for the bitter blue shits

by **zarababe** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:04 pm

Iamheretoplease wrote:The majority of sunday newspapers and radio statoins yesterday were commenting on Evertons rejection of signing Robbie Fowler.

Everton badly need a striker and Moyes said after the chelsea game that they are desperately looking but he wont sign players that look good for three days but in two months are a complete disaster.

So if Fowlers the best as everyone says, why did Moyes reject him when they need a striker?

yoy being clever .. Bitter..

by **The Nancy Boys** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:18 pm

Lando_Griffin wrote:Just like your Mother rejected you, leaving you to be raised in the wild by a Tribe of Elder Poofters.

Another Blatant breach of the forum rules, stating that members should not be abusive to other members.

Moderators, what do you do all day ??

Everything that comes out of this garbage, is abusive.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Orignal poster, I've already stated....Fowler is spent!

He got dropped from man city when Vassell and Cole came, playing a bit part role. And also I've heard that Carra and Stevie persuaded Rafa to sign him.

The move is nothing more than sentiment, as will be shown for the remainder of this season.

by **zarababe** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:21 pm

Goa nd frequent the Man City pages .. 'nancy' don't need your penny's worth here

by **The Nancy Boys** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:24 pm

Shut up. It's just that half of you don't know a decent buy from a bad one.

DOH!

by **zarababe** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:29 pm

you have been asked to leave, in a civilalised way.. now go before I get nasty with ya .. ar.sse ole

by **crazyhorse** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:32 pm

Well, looks like he went!

Fowler would never sign for the Bluenoses. Period.

This story is :censored:

Liverpool FC Forum

Why did everton reject fowler?

Who is online